Parental paternalism as an equity issue: A case study of parental influence on adolescents’ reproductive health in Medellín, Colombia

Q3 Medicine
J. Brisson
{"title":"Parental paternalism as an equity issue: A case study of parental influence on adolescents’ reproductive health in Medellín, Colombia","authors":"J. Brisson","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In bioethics, parental paternalism in adolescent healthcare is typically analyzed through the lens of autonomy and consent, emphasizing parents’ role and adolescents’ capacity to make independent decisions. However, this approach may overlook the role of parental self-interest in shaping healthcare decisions, particularly in the context of reproductive health, and may contribute to inequitable outcomes for adolescents. This exploratory empirical bioethics study examines these dynamics through an equity lens, offering a broader perspective on how relational and social factors can differentially constrain adolescents’ reproductive choices, such as the use of contraceptives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 2024, semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of adolescents aged 10–19 in Medellín, Colombia. Participants were recruited through a sexual and reproductive health clinic and community networks. Transcripts were analyzed using the public health ethics principle of equity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 28 participants, 79% were mothers, and together they had 35 adolescents with a mean age of 14. While parental paternalism is typically framed as solely altruistic, some participants described influencing adolescents’ contraceptive decisions to avoid assuming caregiving roles as young grandparents. In a context like Colombia, where adolescent pregnancy is prevalent and grandparents often provide care, such motivations raise equity concerns about how parental self-interest may unequally constrain adolescents’ reproductive choices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight an underexplored equity concern: when parental self-interest shapes adolescents’ healthcare decisions, it can create unjust disparities in their ability to make reproductive health choices. Equity-oriented approaches must address how family dynamics can reinforce structural barriers to adolescent health and well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In bioethics, parental paternalism in adolescent healthcare is typically analyzed through the lens of autonomy and consent, emphasizing parents’ role and adolescents’ capacity to make independent decisions. However, this approach may overlook the role of parental self-interest in shaping healthcare decisions, particularly in the context of reproductive health, and may contribute to inequitable outcomes for adolescents. This exploratory empirical bioethics study examines these dynamics through an equity lens, offering a broader perspective on how relational and social factors can differentially constrain adolescents’ reproductive choices, such as the use of contraceptives.

Methods

In 2024, semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of adolescents aged 10–19 in Medellín, Colombia. Participants were recruited through a sexual and reproductive health clinic and community networks. Transcripts were analyzed using the public health ethics principle of equity.

Results

Of the 28 participants, 79% were mothers, and together they had 35 adolescents with a mean age of 14. While parental paternalism is typically framed as solely altruistic, some participants described influencing adolescents’ contraceptive decisions to avoid assuming caregiving roles as young grandparents. In a context like Colombia, where adolescent pregnancy is prevalent and grandparents often provide care, such motivations raise equity concerns about how parental self-interest may unequally constrain adolescents’ reproductive choices.

Conclusions

These findings highlight an underexplored equity concern: when parental self-interest shapes adolescents’ healthcare decisions, it can create unjust disparities in their ability to make reproductive health choices. Equity-oriented approaches must address how family dynamics can reinforce structural barriers to adolescent health and well-being.
父母家长式作风作为一个公平问题:父母对哥伦比亚Medellín青少年生殖健康影响的个案研究
在生物伦理学中,通常通过自主和同意的视角来分析青少年医疗保健中的父母家长式作风,强调父母的角色和青少年独立决策的能力。然而,这种做法可能忽视了父母自身利益在形成保健决定方面的作用,特别是在生殖健康方面,并可能导致青少年的不公平结果。这项探索性实证生物伦理学研究通过公平的视角考察了这些动态,为关系和社会因素如何以不同的方式限制青少年的生育选择(如避孕药具的使用)提供了更广阔的视角。方法于2024年对哥伦比亚Medellín地区10-19岁青少年家长进行半结构化访谈。参与者是通过性健康和生殖健康诊所和社区网络招募的。使用公平的公共卫生伦理原则对记录进行分析。结果在28名参与者中,79%是母亲,她们共有35名平均年龄为14岁的青少年。虽然父母的家长式行为通常被认为是完全利他的,但一些参与者描述了影响青少年避孕决定的原因,以避免承担年轻祖父母的照顾角色。在哥伦比亚这样的国家,青少年怀孕很普遍,祖父母通常提供护理,这种动机引起了人们对父母自身利益如何不公地限制青少年生育选择的公平关注。这些发现突出了一个未被充分探讨的公平问题:当父母的自身利益影响青少年的医疗保健决定时,可能会在他们做出生殖健康选择的能力方面造成不公正的差异。面向公平的办法必须解决家庭动态如何加剧青少年健康和福祉的结构性障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信