About twenty-five naughty entropies in belief function theory: Do they measure informativeness?

IF 3.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Radim Jiroušek , Václav Kratochvíl
{"title":"About twenty-five naughty entropies in belief function theory: Do they measure informativeness?","authors":"Radim Jiroušek ,&nbsp;Václav Kratochvíl","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper addresses the long-standing challenge of identifying belief function entropies that can effectively guide model learning within the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Building on the analogy with classical probabilistic approaches, we examine 25 entropy functions documented in the literature and evaluate their potential to define mutual information in the belief function framework. As conceptualized in probability theory, mutual information requires strictly subadditive entropies, which are inversely related to the informativeness of belief functions. After extensive analysis, we have found that none of the studied entropy functions fully satisfy these criteria. Nevertheless, certain entropy functions exhibit properties that may make them useful for heuristic model learning algorithms. This paper provides a detailed comparative study of these functions, explores alternative approaches using divergence-based measures, and offers insights into the design of information-theoretic tools for belief function models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 109454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X25000957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the long-standing challenge of identifying belief function entropies that can effectively guide model learning within the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Building on the analogy with classical probabilistic approaches, we examine 25 entropy functions documented in the literature and evaluate their potential to define mutual information in the belief function framework. As conceptualized in probability theory, mutual information requires strictly subadditive entropies, which are inversely related to the informativeness of belief functions. After extensive analysis, we have found that none of the studied entropy functions fully satisfy these criteria. Nevertheless, certain entropy functions exhibit properties that may make them useful for heuristic model learning algorithms. This paper provides a detailed comparative study of these functions, explores alternative approaches using divergence-based measures, and offers insights into the design of information-theoretic tools for belief function models.
信念函数理论中的25个顽皮熵:它们能衡量信息性吗?
本文解决了识别信念函数熵的长期挑战,该熵可以有效地指导Dempster-Shafer证据理论中的模型学习。基于与经典概率方法的类比,我们研究了文献中记录的25个熵函数,并评估了它们在信念函数框架中定义互信息的潜力。作为概率论的概念,互信息需要严格的次加性熵,这与信念函数的信息量成反比。经过广泛的分析,我们发现所研究的熵函数没有一个完全满足这些标准。然而,某些熵函数表现出的特性可能使它们对启发式模型学习算法有用。本文对这些函数进行了详细的比较研究,探索了使用基于散度的度量方法的替代方法,并为信念函数模型的信息理论工具的设计提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信