Thermo-economic performance assessment of a liquid CO2 energy storage system with different sensible heat storage materials

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Tianyu Deng , Chuang Wu , Weiguo Zhang , Kui Luo
{"title":"Thermo-economic performance assessment of a liquid CO2 energy storage system with different sensible heat storage materials","authors":"Tianyu Deng ,&nbsp;Chuang Wu ,&nbsp;Weiguo Zhang ,&nbsp;Kui Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.136214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Liquid CO<sub>2</sub> energy storage systems offer a promising solution for large-scale energy storage, where the selection of heat storage materials plays a critical role in system performance. This paper investigates the effects of various heat storage materials on the thermo-economic performance of a liquid CO<sub>2</sub> energy storage system, including L-QB300, HITEC molten salt, HITEC XL molten salt, solar salt, Therminol 66, Therminol VP-1, and rapeseed oil. A thermo-economic model is developed, and multi-objective optimization is employed to analyze how these materials affect system performance. The findings indicate optimal configurations for high-pressure tank pressure, low-pressure tank pressure, booster pump pressure rise, and heat storage material split ratio, all of which enhance round-trip efficiency. Specifically, increasing high-pressure tank pressure and throttle valve pressure drop improves energy storage density, while elevated low-pressure tank pressure has a reducing effect. An optimal heat storage material split ratio also maximizes energy storage density. Additionally, configurations that minimize the levelized cost of electricity are identified for high-pressure tank pressure, low-pressure tank pressure, and split ratio, although a higher throttle valve pressure drop results in increased costs. When compared to a pressurized water system, the round-trip efficiency, energy storage density, and levelized cost of electricity improve by 1.00–1.59 %, 4.42–7.47 %, and 0.45–3.05 %, respectively. Among the heat storage materials evaluated, HITEC molten salt demonstrates the best overall performance, achieving a round-trip efficiency of 60.38 %, an energy storage density of 17.7 kW·h/m<sup>3</sup>, and a levelized cost of 0.1554 $/kW·h.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 136214"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225018560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liquid CO2 energy storage systems offer a promising solution for large-scale energy storage, where the selection of heat storage materials plays a critical role in system performance. This paper investigates the effects of various heat storage materials on the thermo-economic performance of a liquid CO2 energy storage system, including L-QB300, HITEC molten salt, HITEC XL molten salt, solar salt, Therminol 66, Therminol VP-1, and rapeseed oil. A thermo-economic model is developed, and multi-objective optimization is employed to analyze how these materials affect system performance. The findings indicate optimal configurations for high-pressure tank pressure, low-pressure tank pressure, booster pump pressure rise, and heat storage material split ratio, all of which enhance round-trip efficiency. Specifically, increasing high-pressure tank pressure and throttle valve pressure drop improves energy storage density, while elevated low-pressure tank pressure has a reducing effect. An optimal heat storage material split ratio also maximizes energy storage density. Additionally, configurations that minimize the levelized cost of electricity are identified for high-pressure tank pressure, low-pressure tank pressure, and split ratio, although a higher throttle valve pressure drop results in increased costs. When compared to a pressurized water system, the round-trip efficiency, energy storage density, and levelized cost of electricity improve by 1.00–1.59 %, 4.42–7.47 %, and 0.45–3.05 %, respectively. Among the heat storage materials evaluated, HITEC molten salt demonstrates the best overall performance, achieving a round-trip efficiency of 60.38 %, an energy storage density of 17.7 kW·h/m3, and a levelized cost of 0.1554 $/kW·h.
不同显热材料的液态CO2储能系统热经济性能评价
液态二氧化碳储能系统为大规模储能提供了一个很有前途的解决方案,其中储热材料的选择对系统性能起着至关重要的作用。本文研究了L-QB300、HITEC熔盐、HITEC XL熔盐、太阳能盐、Therminol 66、Therminol VP-1和菜籽油等多种储热材料对液态CO2储能系统热经济性能的影响。建立了热经济模型,并采用多目标优化方法分析了这些材料对系统性能的影响。研究结果表明,高压罐压、低压罐压、增压泵升压、储热材料分流比等优化配置均能提高往返效率。具体而言,增加高压罐压力和节流阀压降可以提高储能密度,而提高低压罐压力则有降低作用。最佳的储热材料分割比也最大限度地提高了能量储存密度。此外,尽管较高的节流阀压降会导致成本增加,但在高压罐压、低压罐压和分流比方面,仍可以确定将电力成本降至最低的配置。与压水系统相比,往返效率、储能密度和平准化电费分别提高1.00 ~ 1.59%、4.42 ~ 7.47%和0.45 ~ 3.05%。在评估的储热材料中,HITEC熔盐的综合性能最好,往返效率为60.38%,储能密度为17.7 kW·h/m3,平准化成本为0.1554美元/kW·h。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信