{"title":"Is green credit policy financially green for polluting firms’ investment efficiency?","authors":"Huaibing Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The green credit policy was promulgated with the aim of curbing industrial pollution and promoting environmental protection. However, as a direct impact, the policy not only curtails polluting firms' investment scale, but more importantly lowers those firms' Q-sensitivity-based investment efficiency. The results hold firmly after performing a battery of follow-up tests, including pre-treatment trends analysis, placebo tests, matched sample tests, and tests for robustness and addressing endogeneity. Further analysis indicates that the negative impact is more pronounced among polluting firms that are more dependent on external finance, not owned by state, and financially constrained respectively. The decomposition of Tobin's Q provides additional insights, which suggest that the policy simultaneously hurts polluting firms' real growth and forces financial institutions to be more selective toward industry winners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 125547"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725015233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The green credit policy was promulgated with the aim of curbing industrial pollution and promoting environmental protection. However, as a direct impact, the policy not only curtails polluting firms' investment scale, but more importantly lowers those firms' Q-sensitivity-based investment efficiency. The results hold firmly after performing a battery of follow-up tests, including pre-treatment trends analysis, placebo tests, matched sample tests, and tests for robustness and addressing endogeneity. Further analysis indicates that the negative impact is more pronounced among polluting firms that are more dependent on external finance, not owned by state, and financially constrained respectively. The decomposition of Tobin's Q provides additional insights, which suggest that the policy simultaneously hurts polluting firms' real growth and forces financial institutions to be more selective toward industry winners.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.