Check dams: Distribution, purposes and effectiveness

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Saeed Najafi , Mahboobeh Kiani-Harchegani , Deirdre Dragovich
{"title":"Check dams: Distribution, purposes and effectiveness","authors":"Saeed Najafi ,&nbsp;Mahboobeh Kiani-Harchegani ,&nbsp;Deirdre Dragovich","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years the installation of check dams has increased markedly in many environments worldwide. Construction materials, dam size and main purpose/s vary greatly between locations within and between countries, but all dams modify the flows and stores of water, sediment and nutrients. For this reason, check dams are often intended primarily as a component of soil erosion control within watershed management more broadly. This leads to check dams being installed in locations characterized by widely disparate biophysical environments, catchment area, land use/land cover and human requirements. Although the positive impacts of check dams are frequently reported, debate around the effectiveness of check dams become intensified following instances of dam failure. A review of recent literature is needed to examine the reported outcomes of check dam installation and to identify future directions. This broad overview classified 130 (out of 202 reviewed) papers into three main functional groups of soil erosion control: geomorphological, hydrological and ecological, comprising 40 %, 27 % and 8 % respectively of the reviewed papers. The remaining 25 % of contributions either included all functions or did not identify a main purpose for the dams. Results indicated that there is no clear conception of the geomorphological, hydrological and ecological outcomes of the check dam installations, that cost-benefit analysis was rarely undertaken, and that consideration of economic effectiveness was generally restricted to biophysical elements with social costs and benefits being absent. In future studies, evaluations of effectiveness would be assisted by published documentation of planning which detailed outcomes and maintenance over the expected lifetime of individual check dams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"980 ","pages":"Article 179468"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725011052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years the installation of check dams has increased markedly in many environments worldwide. Construction materials, dam size and main purpose/s vary greatly between locations within and between countries, but all dams modify the flows and stores of water, sediment and nutrients. For this reason, check dams are often intended primarily as a component of soil erosion control within watershed management more broadly. This leads to check dams being installed in locations characterized by widely disparate biophysical environments, catchment area, land use/land cover and human requirements. Although the positive impacts of check dams are frequently reported, debate around the effectiveness of check dams become intensified following instances of dam failure. A review of recent literature is needed to examine the reported outcomes of check dam installation and to identify future directions. This broad overview classified 130 (out of 202 reviewed) papers into three main functional groups of soil erosion control: geomorphological, hydrological and ecological, comprising 40 %, 27 % and 8 % respectively of the reviewed papers. The remaining 25 % of contributions either included all functions or did not identify a main purpose for the dams. Results indicated that there is no clear conception of the geomorphological, hydrological and ecological outcomes of the check dam installations, that cost-benefit analysis was rarely undertaken, and that consideration of economic effectiveness was generally restricted to biophysical elements with social costs and benefits being absent. In future studies, evaluations of effectiveness would be assisted by published documentation of planning which detailed outcomes and maintenance over the expected lifetime of individual check dams.

Abstract Image

拦河坝:分布、用途和效果
近年来,在世界各地的许多环境中,拦河坝的安装显著增加。建筑材料、水坝规模和主要用途在国家内部和国家之间的不同地点差别很大,但所有水坝都会改变水、沉积物和营养物质的流动和储存。因此,拦河坝通常主要是作为更广泛的流域管理中控制土壤侵蚀的一个组成部分。这导致在生物物理环境、集水区、土地利用/土地覆盖和人类需求大不相同的地点安装拦河坝。虽然止回坝的积极影响经常被报道,但围绕止回坝有效性的争论在大坝溃坝事件后变得更加激烈。需要对最近的文献进行回顾,以检查报告的止回坝安装结果并确定未来的方向。这一综述将130篇(202篇)论文分为地貌学、水文学和生态学三个主要的土壤侵蚀控制功能组,分别占审评论文的40%、27%和8%。其余25%的捐款要么包括所有功能,要么没有确定大坝的主要用途。结果表明,对拦河坝的地貌、水文和生态结果没有明确的概念,很少进行成本效益分析,对经济效益的考虑一般局限于生物物理因素,而缺乏社会成本和效益。在今后的研究中,效能评价将由公布的规划文件协助进行,这些文件详细说明了个别止回坝在预期寿命内的结果和维护情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信