The effects of generative AI agents and scaffolding on enhancing students’ comprehension of visual learning analytics

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Lixiang Yan , Roberto Martinez-Maldonado , Yueqiao Jin , Vanessa Echeverria , Mikaela Milesi , Jie Fan , Linxuan Zhao , Riordan Alfredo , Xinyu Li , Dragan Gašević
{"title":"The effects of generative AI agents and scaffolding on enhancing students’ comprehension of visual learning analytics","authors":"Lixiang Yan ,&nbsp;Roberto Martinez-Maldonado ,&nbsp;Yueqiao Jin ,&nbsp;Vanessa Echeverria ,&nbsp;Mikaela Milesi ,&nbsp;Jie Fan ,&nbsp;Linxuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Riordan Alfredo ,&nbsp;Xinyu Li ,&nbsp;Dragan Gašević","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Visual learning analytics (VLA) is becoming increasingly adopted in educational technologies and learning analytics dashboards to convey critical insights to students and educators. Yet many students experienced difficulties in comprehending complex VLA due to their limited data visualisation literacy. While conventional scaffolding approaches like data storytelling have shown effectiveness in enhancing students’ comprehension of VLA, these approaches remain difficult to scale and adapt to individual learning needs. Generative AI (GenAI) technologies, especially conversational agents, offer potential solutions by providing personalised and dynamic support to enhance students’ comprehension of VLA. This controlled lab study investigates the effectiveness of GenAI agents, particularly when integrated with scaffolding techniques, in improving students’ comprehension of VLA. A randomised controlled trial was conducted with 117 higher education students to compare the effects of two types of GenAI agents: <em>passive agents</em>, which respond to student queries, and <em>proactive agents</em>, which utilise scaffolding questions, against standalone scaffolding in a VLA comprehension task. The results show that passive agents yield comparable improvements to standalone scaffolding both during and after the intervention. Notably, proactive GenAI agents significantly enhance students’ VLA comprehension compared to both passive agents and standalone scaffolding, with these benefits persisting beyond the intervention. These findings suggest that integrating GenAI agents with scaffolding can have lasting positive effects on students’ comprehension skills and support genuine learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 105322"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000909","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual learning analytics (VLA) is becoming increasingly adopted in educational technologies and learning analytics dashboards to convey critical insights to students and educators. Yet many students experienced difficulties in comprehending complex VLA due to their limited data visualisation literacy. While conventional scaffolding approaches like data storytelling have shown effectiveness in enhancing students’ comprehension of VLA, these approaches remain difficult to scale and adapt to individual learning needs. Generative AI (GenAI) technologies, especially conversational agents, offer potential solutions by providing personalised and dynamic support to enhance students’ comprehension of VLA. This controlled lab study investigates the effectiveness of GenAI agents, particularly when integrated with scaffolding techniques, in improving students’ comprehension of VLA. A randomised controlled trial was conducted with 117 higher education students to compare the effects of two types of GenAI agents: passive agents, which respond to student queries, and proactive agents, which utilise scaffolding questions, against standalone scaffolding in a VLA comprehension task. The results show that passive agents yield comparable improvements to standalone scaffolding both during and after the intervention. Notably, proactive GenAI agents significantly enhance students’ VLA comprehension compared to both passive agents and standalone scaffolding, with these benefits persisting beyond the intervention. These findings suggest that integrating GenAI agents with scaffolding can have lasting positive effects on students’ comprehension skills and support genuine learning.
生成式人工智能代理和脚手架对提高学生对视觉学习分析的理解的影响
视觉学习分析(VLA)在教育技术和学习分析仪表板中被越来越多地采用,以向学生和教育工作者传达重要的见解。然而,由于他们有限的数据可视化素养,许多学生在理解复杂的VLA方面遇到了困难。虽然像数据讲故事这样的传统脚手架方法在提高学生对VLA的理解方面已经显示出有效性,但这些方法仍然难以扩展和适应个人学习需求。生成式人工智能(GenAI)技术,特别是会话代理,通过提供个性化和动态支持来提高学生对VLA的理解,提供了潜在的解决方案。本受控实验室研究调查了GenAI试剂的有效性,特别是当与脚手架技术相结合时,在提高学生对VLA的理解方面。对117名高等教育学生进行了一项随机对照试验,以比较两种类型的GenAI代理的效果:被动代理,响应学生的询问,主动代理,利用脚手架问题,与VLA理解任务中的独立脚手架。结果表明,在干预期间和之后,被动药物产生了与独立支架相当的改善。值得注意的是,与被动试剂和独立支架相比,主动GenAI试剂显著提高了学生对VLA的理解,这些益处持续存在于干预之后。这些发现表明,将GenAI代理与脚手架结合可以对学生的理解技能产生持久的积极影响,并支持真正的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信