Personalized adherence interventions using medication adherence technologies in polypharmacy management in epilepsy: An interprofessional case report

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Micheline C. Sarbach , Stephan Rüegg , Samuel S. Allemann , Isabelle Arnet
{"title":"Personalized adherence interventions using medication adherence technologies in polypharmacy management in epilepsy: An interprofessional case report","authors":"Micheline C. Sarbach ,&nbsp;Stephan Rüegg ,&nbsp;Samuel S. Allemann ,&nbsp;Isabelle Arnet","doi":"10.1016/j.ebr.2025.100767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We describe a male patient with symptomatic multifocal epilepsy struggling with medication adherence. He accepted escalating adherence interventions with conventional dosing aids such as pillboxes and medication adherence technologies (MATech) including a smart medication dispensing and adherence device (SMAD). Adherence metrics and drug levels were continuously monitored by electronic monitoring (EM) and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Initially, adherence metrics with pre-filled punch cards supplied by a community pharmacy showed 64% taking adherence, 63% timing adherence, and 47% correctly dosed days, including a five-day medication holiday. Adherence improved with a pharmacy-filled SMAD, reaching 93% taking adherence, 90% timing adherence, 86% correctly dosed days, and no medication holiday. No epileptic seizures were noticed during periods with EM. The patient was satisfied with the SMAD while struggling with other adherence tools. Adherence tended to decrease once adherence reminders were removed. In conclusion, we emphasize the importance of personalized adherence strategies and shared decision-making. This case highlights the positive impact of an interprofessional adherence improvement program, integrating efforts from researchers, neurologists, and community pharmacists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36558,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100767"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589986425000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We describe a male patient with symptomatic multifocal epilepsy struggling with medication adherence. He accepted escalating adherence interventions with conventional dosing aids such as pillboxes and medication adherence technologies (MATech) including a smart medication dispensing and adherence device (SMAD). Adherence metrics and drug levels were continuously monitored by electronic monitoring (EM) and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Initially, adherence metrics with pre-filled punch cards supplied by a community pharmacy showed 64% taking adherence, 63% timing adherence, and 47% correctly dosed days, including a five-day medication holiday. Adherence improved with a pharmacy-filled SMAD, reaching 93% taking adherence, 90% timing adherence, 86% correctly dosed days, and no medication holiday. No epileptic seizures were noticed during periods with EM. The patient was satisfied with the SMAD while struggling with other adherence tools. Adherence tended to decrease once adherence reminders were removed. In conclusion, we emphasize the importance of personalized adherence strategies and shared decision-making. This case highlights the positive impact of an interprofessional adherence improvement program, integrating efforts from researchers, neurologists, and community pharmacists.
在癫痫综合药房管理中使用药物依从性技术的个性化依从性干预:一份跨专业病例报告
我们描述了一个男性患者的症状多局灶性癫痫与药物依从性斗争。他接受了不断升级的依从性干预措施,包括传统的给药辅助工具,如药盒和药物依从性技术(MATech),包括智能药物分配和依从性设备(SMAD)。通过电子监测(EM)和治疗药物监测(TDM)连续监测依从性指标和药物水平。最初,使用社区药房提供的预填打孔卡的依从性指标显示,64%的人坚持服药,63%的人按时服药,47%的人正确服药,包括五天的用药假期。药物填充的SMAD改善了依从性,达到93%的服药依从性,90%的定时依从性,86%的正确给药天数,没有药物假期。在EM期间未发现癫痫发作。患者对SMAD感到满意,同时挣扎于其他依从性工具。依从性倾向于减少一旦依从性提醒被删除。总之,我们强调个性化依从性策略和共同决策的重要性。这个案例强调了一个跨专业的依从性改善项目的积极影响,整合了研究人员、神经学家和社区药剂师的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy and Behavior Reports
Epilepsy and Behavior Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信