The development of Forest Management Cooperatives from Self-Helping Facilities to Professional Service Providers – A Case Study in Bavaria

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Anton Wadenspanner , Anika Gaggermeier , Michael Suda
{"title":"The development of Forest Management Cooperatives from Self-Helping Facilities to Professional Service Providers – A Case Study in Bavaria","authors":"Anton Wadenspanner ,&nbsp;Anika Gaggermeier ,&nbsp;Michael Suda","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thirty years ago, the state of Bavaria initiated a discussion on the reform of private forestry advice, which was influenced by privatization tendencies and the discourse on timber mobilization. This discourse led to the 2005 forestry reform, which established and financially strengthened forestry management cooperatives (FMCs) with the aim of mobilizing timber from private forests and establishing independent and efficient FMCs. Given the paucity of research on the professionalization of FMCs, this study employs qualitative research methods with an exploratory approach. The primary goal of this study is to examine how Bavarian FMCs have developed since the 2005 forestry reform. Data on development and professionalization were collected using a pre-tested and standardized questionnaire sent to all FMCs in Bavaria (<em>N</em> = 136, response rate 63 %). The analysis reveals that the Bavarian approach has led to an economic and technically oriented production focus, as evidenced by the 70 criteria that define a professional FMC and the findings that FMCs have developed into service-oriented organizations that focus heavily on timber sales and traditional forestry tasks while continuously adapting to external circumstances. The findings reveal that external pressures, including funding directives and environmental imperatives, in conjunction with internal forces such as organizational restructuring and technological enhancements, have exerted a substantial influence on this evolution. This has culminated in an enhancement of service quality and operational efficiency, which has significant ramifications for future policy developments and cross-national benchmarking processes. The research's added value lies in the establishment of a comprehensive benchmark of professionalization criteria that not only deepens the understanding of FMC development in Bavaria but also offers practical insights and reference points for policymakers and practitioners in other European regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 103495"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thirty years ago, the state of Bavaria initiated a discussion on the reform of private forestry advice, which was influenced by privatization tendencies and the discourse on timber mobilization. This discourse led to the 2005 forestry reform, which established and financially strengthened forestry management cooperatives (FMCs) with the aim of mobilizing timber from private forests and establishing independent and efficient FMCs. Given the paucity of research on the professionalization of FMCs, this study employs qualitative research methods with an exploratory approach. The primary goal of this study is to examine how Bavarian FMCs have developed since the 2005 forestry reform. Data on development and professionalization were collected using a pre-tested and standardized questionnaire sent to all FMCs in Bavaria (N = 136, response rate 63 %). The analysis reveals that the Bavarian approach has led to an economic and technically oriented production focus, as evidenced by the 70 criteria that define a professional FMC and the findings that FMCs have developed into service-oriented organizations that focus heavily on timber sales and traditional forestry tasks while continuously adapting to external circumstances. The findings reveal that external pressures, including funding directives and environmental imperatives, in conjunction with internal forces such as organizational restructuring and technological enhancements, have exerted a substantial influence on this evolution. This has culminated in an enhancement of service quality and operational efficiency, which has significant ramifications for future policy developments and cross-national benchmarking processes. The research's added value lies in the establishment of a comprehensive benchmark of professionalization criteria that not only deepens the understanding of FMC development in Bavaria but also offers practical insights and reference points for policymakers and practitioners in other European regions.
森林经营合作社从自助设施向专业服务提供者的发展——以巴伐利亚州为例
30年前,受私有化趋势和木材动员话语的影响,巴伐利亚州发起了关于私营林业咨询改革的讨论。这一讨论导致了2005年的林业改革,该改革建立并在财政上加强了林业管理合作社(fmc),旨在从私人森林中动员木材,并建立独立、高效的fmc。鉴于fmc职业化研究的缺乏,本研究采用定性研究方法和探索性研究方法。本研究的主要目的是考察巴伐利亚fmc自2005年林业改革以来的发展情况。通过向巴伐利亚州所有fmc (N = 136,回复率63%)发送预测试和标准化问卷收集有关发展和专业化的数据。分析表明,巴伐利亚方法导致了以经济和技术为导向的生产重点,这一点可以从定义专业FMC的70个标准中得到证明,FMC已经发展成为以服务为导向的组织,主要关注木材销售和传统林业任务,同时不断适应外部环境。调查结果表明,外部压力,包括供资指示和环境要求,加上内部力量,如组织改组和技术改进,对这一演变产生了重大影响。这最终提高了服务质量和业务效率,对今后的政策发展和跨国基准制定进程产生了重大影响。本研究的附加值在于建立了一个全面的专业化标准基准,不仅加深了对巴伐利亚州FMC发展的理解,而且为欧洲其他地区的政策制定者和从业者提供了实践见解和参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信