{"title":"Spatial-temporal trends and driving mechanisms of land degradation sensitivity in the southern region of China","authors":"Abiot Molla , Yin Ren , Yilkal Gebeyehu Mekonnen , Shudi Zuo , Pengfei Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating land sensitivity to degradation and its driving factors is crucial due to both environmental and human influences. This helps to identify vulnerable regions and develop effective land management strategies.<!--> <!-->This study examines land degradation trends and driving factors in southern China from 2000 to 2020 using Mediterranean Desertification And Land Use (MEDALUS) and Geographical Detector models.<!--> <!-->Eighteen factors are grouped into four indices: Vegetation Quality Index (VQI), Climate Quality Index (CQI), Management Quality Index (MQI), and Soil Quality Index (SQI) to formulate the Land Degradation Sensitivity Index (LDSI).<!--> <!-->The results indicated that fragile and critical land degradation sensitivity is primarily distributed in the Yangtze River, Dongting Lake, Xinjiang, and Taihu basins of the study regions. Quantitatively, the critical sensitivity class of LDSI comprised 13.35 %, 16.95 %, and 17.95 % of the total areas in 2000, 2010, and 2020, respectively. Over the last 20 years, 23.2 % and 16.4 % of ’Potential’ lands became ’Fragile’ and ’Critical’, respectively. These trends indicate the ongoing shift from less degraded to more degraded states.<!--> <!-->The interaction detector results showed that the combinations of VQI ∩ CQI, and VQI ∩ SQI had the most significant effects on LDSI. Erosion protection (EPs), drought resistance (DRs), fire resistance (FRs), wind speed (WindSpe), precipitation (PRE), land use intensity (LUI), and soil group (SoilGr) are the main drivers. To effectively combat land degradation, it is essential to address the key factors that contribute to it. The study provided a scientific foundation for understanding land degradation sensitivity in the study regions and a global reference for quantifying its causes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113532"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluating land sensitivity to degradation and its driving factors is crucial due to both environmental and human influences. This helps to identify vulnerable regions and develop effective land management strategies. This study examines land degradation trends and driving factors in southern China from 2000 to 2020 using Mediterranean Desertification And Land Use (MEDALUS) and Geographical Detector models. Eighteen factors are grouped into four indices: Vegetation Quality Index (VQI), Climate Quality Index (CQI), Management Quality Index (MQI), and Soil Quality Index (SQI) to formulate the Land Degradation Sensitivity Index (LDSI). The results indicated that fragile and critical land degradation sensitivity is primarily distributed in the Yangtze River, Dongting Lake, Xinjiang, and Taihu basins of the study regions. Quantitatively, the critical sensitivity class of LDSI comprised 13.35 %, 16.95 %, and 17.95 % of the total areas in 2000, 2010, and 2020, respectively. Over the last 20 years, 23.2 % and 16.4 % of ’Potential’ lands became ’Fragile’ and ’Critical’, respectively. These trends indicate the ongoing shift from less degraded to more degraded states. The interaction detector results showed that the combinations of VQI ∩ CQI, and VQI ∩ SQI had the most significant effects on LDSI. Erosion protection (EPs), drought resistance (DRs), fire resistance (FRs), wind speed (WindSpe), precipitation (PRE), land use intensity (LUI), and soil group (SoilGr) are the main drivers. To effectively combat land degradation, it is essential to address the key factors that contribute to it. The study provided a scientific foundation for understanding land degradation sensitivity in the study regions and a global reference for quantifying its causes.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.