Spatial-temporal trends and driving mechanisms of land degradation sensitivity in the southern region of China

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Abiot Molla , Yin Ren , Yilkal Gebeyehu Mekonnen , Shudi Zuo , Pengfei Zhu
{"title":"Spatial-temporal trends and driving mechanisms of land degradation sensitivity in the southern region of China","authors":"Abiot Molla ,&nbsp;Yin Ren ,&nbsp;Yilkal Gebeyehu Mekonnen ,&nbsp;Shudi Zuo ,&nbsp;Pengfei Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating land sensitivity to degradation and its driving factors is crucial due to both environmental and human influences. This helps to identify vulnerable regions and develop effective land management strategies.<!--> <!-->This study examines land degradation trends and driving factors in southern China from 2000 to 2020 using Mediterranean Desertification And Land Use (MEDALUS) and Geographical Detector models.<!--> <!-->Eighteen factors are grouped into four indices: Vegetation Quality Index (VQI), Climate Quality Index (CQI), Management Quality Index (MQI), and Soil Quality Index (SQI) to formulate the Land Degradation Sensitivity Index (LDSI).<!--> <!-->The results indicated that fragile and critical land degradation sensitivity is primarily distributed in the Yangtze River, Dongting Lake, Xinjiang, and Taihu basins of the study regions. Quantitatively, the critical sensitivity class of LDSI comprised 13.35 %, 16.95 %, and 17.95 % of the total areas in 2000, 2010, and 2020, respectively. Over the last 20 years, 23.2 % and 16.4 % of ’Potential’ lands became ’Fragile’ and ’Critical’, respectively. These trends indicate the ongoing shift from less degraded to more degraded states.<!--> <!-->The interaction detector results showed that the combinations of VQI ∩ CQI, and VQI ∩ SQI had the most significant effects on LDSI. Erosion protection (EPs), drought resistance (DRs), fire resistance (FRs), wind speed (WindSpe), precipitation (PRE), land use intensity (LUI), and soil group (SoilGr) are the main drivers. To effectively combat land degradation, it is essential to address the key factors that contribute to it. The study provided a scientific foundation for understanding land degradation sensitivity in the study regions and a global reference for quantifying its causes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113532"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating land sensitivity to degradation and its driving factors is crucial due to both environmental and human influences. This helps to identify vulnerable regions and develop effective land management strategies. This study examines land degradation trends and driving factors in southern China from 2000 to 2020 using Mediterranean Desertification And Land Use (MEDALUS) and Geographical Detector models. Eighteen factors are grouped into four indices: Vegetation Quality Index (VQI), Climate Quality Index (CQI), Management Quality Index (MQI), and Soil Quality Index (SQI) to formulate the Land Degradation Sensitivity Index (LDSI). The results indicated that fragile and critical land degradation sensitivity is primarily distributed in the Yangtze River, Dongting Lake, Xinjiang, and Taihu basins of the study regions. Quantitatively, the critical sensitivity class of LDSI comprised 13.35 %, 16.95 %, and 17.95 % of the total areas in 2000, 2010, and 2020, respectively. Over the last 20 years, 23.2 % and 16.4 % of ’Potential’ lands became ’Fragile’ and ’Critical’, respectively. These trends indicate the ongoing shift from less degraded to more degraded states. The interaction detector results showed that the combinations of VQI ∩ CQI, and VQI ∩ SQI had the most significant effects on LDSI. Erosion protection (EPs), drought resistance (DRs), fire resistance (FRs), wind speed (WindSpe), precipitation (PRE), land use intensity (LUI), and soil group (SoilGr) are the main drivers. To effectively combat land degradation, it is essential to address the key factors that contribute to it. The study provided a scientific foundation for understanding land degradation sensitivity in the study regions and a global reference for quantifying its causes.
中国南方土地退化敏感性时空变化趋势及驱动机制
由于环境和人类的影响,评估土地对退化的敏感性及其驱动因素至关重要。这有助于确定脆弱地区并制定有效的土地管理战略。利用地中海沙漠化与土地利用(MEDALUS)模型和地理探测器模型,研究了2000 - 2020年中国南方土地退化趋势及其驱动因素。将18个因子分为植被质量指数(VQI)、气候质量指数(CQI)、管理质量指数(MQI)和土壤质量指数(SQI) 4个指数,形成土地退化敏感性指数(LDSI)。结果表明:土地退化脆弱和临界敏感性主要分布在长江流域、洞庭湖流域、新疆流域和太湖流域;2000年、2010年和2020年,LDSI的临界敏感等级分别占总面积的13.35%、16.95%和17.95%。在过去的20年里,23.2%和16.4%的“潜在”土地分别变成了“脆弱”和“危急”。这些趋势表明正在从退化程度较低的状态向退化程度较高的状态转变。交互探测结果表明,VQI∩CQI和VQI∩SQI组合对LDSI的影响最为显著。侵蚀防护(EPs)、抗旱性(DRs)、耐火性(FRs)、风速(WindSpe)、降水(PRE)、土地利用强度(LUI)和土壤类型(SoilGr)是主要驱动因素。为了有效地防治土地退化,必须解决造成土地退化的关键因素。该研究为了解研究区域土地退化敏感性提供了科学依据,并为量化其原因提供了全球参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信