UAV LiDAR expands the understanding of forest tree diversity

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jianyang Liu , Ying Quan , Guoqiang Zhao , Baozhong Yuan , Bin Wang , Mingze Li
{"title":"UAV LiDAR expands the understanding of forest tree diversity","authors":"Jianyang Liu ,&nbsp;Ying Quan ,&nbsp;Guoqiang Zhao ,&nbsp;Baozhong Yuan ,&nbsp;Bin Wang ,&nbsp;Mingze Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Timely and accurate monitoring of forest tree diversity is essential to support ecological evaluation and sustainable forest management. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) features in explaining tree diversity. However, how LiDAR-drived features, particularly height heterogeneity, relate to plot-level tree species diversity across spatial scales has not been systematically evaluated. To address this, we conducted a field survey in natural secondary forests and collected unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR data. Traditional diversity indices were calculated using relative density and importance value, and their correlations with LiDAR features were analyzed. These analyses incorporated assessments of different spatial resolutions and heterogeneity metrics for estimating tree diversity. The results revealed that (1) the diversity indices calculated with importance value correlate better with LiDAR features than with relative density; (2) among heterogeneity metrics, Rao’s Q outperformed the coefficient of variation (CV), and heterogeneity metrics overall performed better than structural features in estimating tree diversity; (3) the LiDAR data provided fine-scale structural information, with the highest accuracy for estimating tree diversity achieved at a 1 m spatial resolution; and (4) features from the cover category, including canopy cover (CC), cover of the herbaceous layer (CH), and cover of the tree layer (CT), demonstrated greater robustness and stronger correlations with tree diversity across different spatial resolutions. Our study suggests that using high-resolution UAV LiDAR data, combined with diversity indices based on importance values, can enhance biodiversity assessment and inform forest management strategies aimed at promoting structural complexity and supporting tree diversity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113534"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Timely and accurate monitoring of forest tree diversity is essential to support ecological evaluation and sustainable forest management. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) features in explaining tree diversity. However, how LiDAR-drived features, particularly height heterogeneity, relate to plot-level tree species diversity across spatial scales has not been systematically evaluated. To address this, we conducted a field survey in natural secondary forests and collected unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) LiDAR data. Traditional diversity indices were calculated using relative density and importance value, and their correlations with LiDAR features were analyzed. These analyses incorporated assessments of different spatial resolutions and heterogeneity metrics for estimating tree diversity. The results revealed that (1) the diversity indices calculated with importance value correlate better with LiDAR features than with relative density; (2) among heterogeneity metrics, Rao’s Q outperformed the coefficient of variation (CV), and heterogeneity metrics overall performed better than structural features in estimating tree diversity; (3) the LiDAR data provided fine-scale structural information, with the highest accuracy for estimating tree diversity achieved at a 1 m spatial resolution; and (4) features from the cover category, including canopy cover (CC), cover of the herbaceous layer (CH), and cover of the tree layer (CT), demonstrated greater robustness and stronger correlations with tree diversity across different spatial resolutions. Our study suggests that using high-resolution UAV LiDAR data, combined with diversity indices based on importance values, can enhance biodiversity assessment and inform forest management strategies aimed at promoting structural complexity and supporting tree diversity.
无人机激光雷达扩展了对森林树木多样性的认识
及时、准确地监测林木多样性对支持生态评价和可持续森林管理至关重要。最近的研究强调了光探测和测距(LiDAR)特征在解释树木多样性方面的重要性。然而,激光雷达驱动的特征,特别是高度异质性,如何在空间尺度上与样地水平的树种多样性相关,尚未得到系统的评估。为了解决这一问题,我们对天然次生林进行了实地调查,并收集了无人机(UAV)激光雷达数据。利用相对密度和重要值计算传统多样性指数,并分析其与激光雷达特征的相关性。这些分析结合了不同空间分辨率和异质性指标的评估来估计树木多样性。结果表明:(1)重要性值计算的多样性指数与LiDAR特征的相关性优于与相对密度的相关性;(2)异质性指标中,Rao’s Q优于变异系数(CV),异质性指标总体上优于结构特征;(3)激光雷达数据提供了精细尺度的结构信息,在1 m空间分辨率下的树木多样性估算精度最高;(4)不同空间分辨率下,冠层、草本层和乔木层覆盖度特征与树木多样性的相关性和鲁棒性均较强。本研究表明,利用高分辨率无人机激光雷达数据,结合基于重要值的多样性指数,可以增强生物多样性评估,并为旨在提高结构复杂性和支持树木多样性的森林管理策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信