Irene Bayiyana , Anton Bua , Annet Namuddu , Alfred Ozimati , Tom Omara , Sam Wamani , Sam Morris Opio , Sarah Apio , Richard Kabaalu , Daisy Kemigisha , John Colvin , Christopher Abu Omongo
{"title":"Farmer uptake of cassava-whitefly management technologies and implications for future breeding and promotional efforts","authors":"Irene Bayiyana , Anton Bua , Annet Namuddu , Alfred Ozimati , Tom Omara , Sam Wamani , Sam Morris Opio , Sarah Apio , Richard Kabaalu , Daisy Kemigisha , John Colvin , Christopher Abu Omongo","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cassava stands as Uganda's second most vital staple food after bananas, playing a crucial economic role for smallholder farmers. However, whiteflies significantly reduce cassava yields, jeopardizing farmers' incomes and food security. Aside from direct damage, the cassava whitefly transmits cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) and cassava mosaic disease (CMD), leading to potential yield losses ranging from 70 % to 100 %. The control of whiteflies in cassava cultivation is complicated by the prevalence of varieties susceptible to these pests and the farmers' limited knowledge of effective insecticide use. A study employing both quantitative and qualitative survey methods was conducted to assess smallholder farmers' awareness and adoption of the whitefly-tolerant cassava variety, Mkumba, and the systemic insecticide imidacloprid. Findings reveal that 35.2 % of farmers grew Mkumba, while 31.9 % utilized chemical control. Furthermore, 34.7 % identified whiteflies on cassava, with 45.4 % associating sooty moulds on leaves with whitefly feeding. Awareness of these control technologies was evident among farmers. However, factors such as the farmer's age and sex influenced the adoption of Mkumba, with barriers including the limited availability and high costs of insecticides and certain undesirable traits of Mkumba hindering broader uptake. Addressing these challenges may enhance the adoption and demand for these technologies in cassava farming.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 107252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cassava stands as Uganda's second most vital staple food after bananas, playing a crucial economic role for smallholder farmers. However, whiteflies significantly reduce cassava yields, jeopardizing farmers' incomes and food security. Aside from direct damage, the cassava whitefly transmits cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) and cassava mosaic disease (CMD), leading to potential yield losses ranging from 70 % to 100 %. The control of whiteflies in cassava cultivation is complicated by the prevalence of varieties susceptible to these pests and the farmers' limited knowledge of effective insecticide use. A study employing both quantitative and qualitative survey methods was conducted to assess smallholder farmers' awareness and adoption of the whitefly-tolerant cassava variety, Mkumba, and the systemic insecticide imidacloprid. Findings reveal that 35.2 % of farmers grew Mkumba, while 31.9 % utilized chemical control. Furthermore, 34.7 % identified whiteflies on cassava, with 45.4 % associating sooty moulds on leaves with whitefly feeding. Awareness of these control technologies was evident among farmers. However, factors such as the farmer's age and sex influenced the adoption of Mkumba, with barriers including the limited availability and high costs of insecticides and certain undesirable traits of Mkumba hindering broader uptake. Addressing these challenges may enhance the adoption and demand for these technologies in cassava farming.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.