A network analysis of statistics anxiety symptoms and their antecedents in UK higher education students

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Joshua J. March, David Hamilton, Dawn McCormack, Ross Brisco, Amy Grech
{"title":"A network analysis of statistics anxiety symptoms and their antecedents in UK higher education students","authors":"Joshua J. March, David Hamilton, Dawn McCormack, Ross Brisco, Amy Grech","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistics anxiety is a widespread, multifaceted phenomenon affecting many students in higher education. Feelings of excessive worry when exposed to statistical content impact student performance and heighten negative perceptions of statistics. While many factors have been identified as relevant antecedents of statistics anxiety, it is unclear how they relate to different components of this phenomenon, and which factors are most influential. Additionally, no research has investigated the impact of peer attitudes toward statistics anxiety. The current study describes a preregistered network analysis of statistics anxiety, peer attitudes, and related variables with a sample of 279 UK higher education students. After performing reliability checks, results support the distinction made in previous literature between attitudes toward statistics and statistics anxiety per se. The former were influenced by feelings of statistics self-efficacy, age, and peer attitudes toward statistics, and the latter was influenced by negative problem orientation and intolerance of uncertainty. The most influential nodes were the negative problem orientation variables, inhibitory anxiety, and interpretation anxiety. The findings are discussed in relation to addressing statistics anxiety from multiple angles.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statistics anxiety is a widespread, multifaceted phenomenon affecting many students in higher education. Feelings of excessive worry when exposed to statistical content impact student performance and heighten negative perceptions of statistics. While many factors have been identified as relevant antecedents of statistics anxiety, it is unclear how they relate to different components of this phenomenon, and which factors are most influential. Additionally, no research has investigated the impact of peer attitudes toward statistics anxiety. The current study describes a preregistered network analysis of statistics anxiety, peer attitudes, and related variables with a sample of 279 UK higher education students. After performing reliability checks, results support the distinction made in previous literature between attitudes toward statistics and statistics anxiety per se. The former were influenced by feelings of statistics self-efficacy, age, and peer attitudes toward statistics, and the latter was influenced by negative problem orientation and intolerance of uncertainty. The most influential nodes were the negative problem orientation variables, inhibitory anxiety, and interpretation anxiety. The findings are discussed in relation to addressing statistics anxiety from multiple angles.

Abstract Image

英国高等教育学生焦虑症状及其前因的统计网络分析
统计焦虑是一种广泛的、多方面的现象,影响着许多高等教育学生。当接触到统计内容时,过度担心的感觉会影响学生的表现,并加剧对统计的负面看法。虽然许多因素已被确定为统计焦虑的相关前因,但尚不清楚它们与这一现象的不同组成部分之间的关系,以及哪些因素最具影响力。此外,没有研究调查同伴对统计焦虑的态度的影响。目前的研究对279名英国高等教育学生的统计焦虑、同伴态度和相关变量进行了预先注册的网络分析。在执行信度检验后,结果支持先前文献中对统计态度和统计焦虑本身的区别。前者受统计自我效能感、年龄和同伴统计态度的影响,后者受消极问题取向和不确定性不容性的影响。负性问题导向变量、抑制性焦虑和解释焦虑是影响最大的节点。从多个角度讨论了与解决统计焦虑相关的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信