Digital Long Covid Communities—Shaping Diagnoses, Treatment Strategies and Modes of Expertise

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Petter Almqvist-Ingersoll
{"title":"Digital Long Covid Communities—Shaping Diagnoses, Treatment Strategies and Modes of Expertise","authors":"Petter Almqvist-Ingersoll","doi":"10.1111/hex.70279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Despite having been created on social media, research into the effects of online engagement on long Covid (LC) as a diagnosis is scarce. Studies on other health-related communities and patient participation argue that social media and other digital technologies have been instrumental in creating new ways for activism, advocacy and sharing of experiences. With its status as patient-made, LC constitutes an example of how diagnoses are (re)constructed through social interactions in addition to Western biomedical science and clinical practice. The aim of the study is to investigate the ways in which lived experiences and larger narratives of LC are communicated and form understandings of the condition as a heterogeneous diagnosis/phenomenon.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study uses netnography, mainly focused on hidden observations of patient support and advocacy forums in which users' posts are individually sourced and thematically analysed. These themes are further discussed to illustrate overarching discourse that contributes to the sense-making and creation of knowledge surrounding LC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights three major themes, namely: users seeking commonalities in experienced symptoms, interpatient tinkering as a form of biohacking conceptualised as an epistemological process, and negotiating expertise.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The study finds that narratives shared in online spaces regarding LC act as critical factors that serve not just the affected individuals' sense-making and understanding of their lived experience, but also in the construction of the diagnosis itself. Through sharing experiences, symptoms, scientific information and treatment options, forum users contribute to knowledge production processes that change the definition of LC as a diagnosis. Building on the sociology of diagnosis, I argue that LC serves as a significant example of how diagnoses are products of the entanglement between biomedicine, clinical practice, the social and the digital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>The project operates under the premise that patients from different social, cultural and professional backgrounds participate in online discussions about long Covid and that these individuals work towards individual as well as collective well-being. As such, highlighting their engagement has the potential to inform and strengthen research and clinical practice in various ways.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70279","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite having been created on social media, research into the effects of online engagement on long Covid (LC) as a diagnosis is scarce. Studies on other health-related communities and patient participation argue that social media and other digital technologies have been instrumental in creating new ways for activism, advocacy and sharing of experiences. With its status as patient-made, LC constitutes an example of how diagnoses are (re)constructed through social interactions in addition to Western biomedical science and clinical practice. The aim of the study is to investigate the ways in which lived experiences and larger narratives of LC are communicated and form understandings of the condition as a heterogeneous diagnosis/phenomenon.

Methods

This study uses netnography, mainly focused on hidden observations of patient support and advocacy forums in which users' posts are individually sourced and thematically analysed. These themes are further discussed to illustrate overarching discourse that contributes to the sense-making and creation of knowledge surrounding LC.

Results

The study highlights three major themes, namely: users seeking commonalities in experienced symptoms, interpatient tinkering as a form of biohacking conceptualised as an epistemological process, and negotiating expertise.

Discussion

The study finds that narratives shared in online spaces regarding LC act as critical factors that serve not just the affected individuals' sense-making and understanding of their lived experience, but also in the construction of the diagnosis itself. Through sharing experiences, symptoms, scientific information and treatment options, forum users contribute to knowledge production processes that change the definition of LC as a diagnosis. Building on the sociology of diagnosis, I argue that LC serves as a significant example of how diagnoses are products of the entanglement between biomedicine, clinical practice, the social and the digital.

Patient or Public Contribution

The project operates under the premise that patients from different social, cultural and professional backgrounds participate in online discussions about long Covid and that these individuals work towards individual as well as collective well-being. As such, highlighting their engagement has the potential to inform and strengthen research and clinical practice in various ways.

数字长冠社区——塑造诊断、治疗策略和专业模式
尽管在线参与是在社交媒体上创建的,但关于在线参与对长冠状病毒(LC)诊断的影响的研究很少。关于其他健康相关社区和患者参与的研究认为,社交媒体和其他数字技术在为行动主义、倡导和分享经验创造新途径方面发挥了重要作用。由于LC是由患者自行制作的,除了西方生物医学科学和临床实践之外,LC还构成了如何通过社会互动(重新)构建诊断的一个例子。本研究的目的是调查生活经历和LC的更大叙述的沟通方式,并形成对这种情况作为异质诊断/现象的理解。方法本研究使用网络图,主要集中于对患者支持和倡导论坛的隐藏观察,其中用户的帖子被单独来源并进行主题分析。这些主题将进一步讨论,以说明有助于围绕LC的意义构建和知识创造的总体话语。结果:该研究突出了三个主要主题,即:用户在经历的症状中寻求共同点,作为认识论过程概念化的生物黑客形式的患者间修补,以及协商专业知识。研究发现,在线空间中分享的关于LC的叙述作为关键因素,不仅服务于受影响个体对其生活经验的意义和理解,而且还服务于诊断本身的构建。通过分享经验、症状、科学信息和治疗方案,论坛用户为知识生产过程做出了贡献,改变了LC作为一种诊断的定义。在诊断社会学的基础上,我认为LC是一个重要的例子,说明诊断是生物医学、临床实践、社会和数字之间纠缠的产物。项目开展的前提是,来自不同社会、文化和专业背景的患者参与关于Covid - 19的在线讨论,并为个人和集体福祉而努力。因此,强调他们的参与有可能以各种方式为研究和临床实践提供信息和加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信