Hyperspectral leaf reflectance of grasses varies with evolutionary lineage more than with site

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70257
Stephanie Pau, Ryan Slapikas, Che-Ling Ho, Shannon L. J. Bayliss, Ryan C. Donnelly, Adam Abdullahi, Brent R. Helliker, Jesse B. Nippert, William J. Riley, Christopher J. Still, Emily R. Wedel, Daniel M. Griffith
{"title":"Hyperspectral leaf reflectance of grasses varies with evolutionary lineage more than with site","authors":"Stephanie Pau,&nbsp;Ryan Slapikas,&nbsp;Che-Ling Ho,&nbsp;Shannon L. J. Bayliss,&nbsp;Ryan C. Donnelly,&nbsp;Adam Abdullahi,&nbsp;Brent R. Helliker,&nbsp;Jesse B. Nippert,&nbsp;William J. Riley,&nbsp;Christopher J. Still,&nbsp;Emily R. Wedel,&nbsp;Daniel M. Griffith","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To predict ecological responses at broad environmental scales, grass species are commonly grouped into two broad functional types based on photosynthetic pathway. However, closely related species may have distinctive anatomical and physiological attributes that influence ecological responses, beyond those related to photosynthetic pathway alone. Hyperspectral leaf reflectance can provide an integrated measure of covarying leaf traits that may result from phylogenetic trait conservatism and/or environmental conditions. Understanding whether spectra-trait relationships are lineage specific or reflect environmental variation across sites is necessary for using hyperspectral reflectance to predict plant responses to environmental changes across spatial scales. We measured hyperspectral leaf reflectance (400–2400 nm) and 12 structural, biochemical, and physiological leaf traits from five grass-dominated sites spanning the Great Plains of North America. We assessed if variation in leaf reflectance spectra among grass species is explained more by evolutionary lineage (as captured by tribes or subfamilies), photosynthetic pathway (C<sub>3</sub> or C<sub>4</sub>), or site differences. We then determined whether leaf spectra can be used to predict leaf traits within and across lineages. Our results using redundancy analysis ordination (RDA) show that grass tribe identity explained more variation in leaf spectra (adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.12) than photosynthetic pathway, which explained little variation in leaf spectra (adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.00). Furthermore, leaf reflectance from the same tribe across multiple sites was more similar than leaf reflectance from the same site across tribes (adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.12 and 0.08, respectively). Across all sites and species, trait predictions based on spectra ranged considerably in predictive accuracies (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.65 to &lt;0.01), but <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> was &gt;0.80 for certain lineages and sites. The relationship between Vc<sub>max</sub>, a measure of photosynthetic capacity, and spectra was particularly promising. Chloridoideae, a lineage more common at drier sites, appears to have distinct spectra-trait relationships compared with other lineages. Overall, our results show that evolutionary relatedness explains more variation in grass leaf spectra than photosynthetic pathway or site, but consideration of lineage- and site-specific trait relationships is needed to interpret spectral variation across large environmental gradients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70257","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To predict ecological responses at broad environmental scales, grass species are commonly grouped into two broad functional types based on photosynthetic pathway. However, closely related species may have distinctive anatomical and physiological attributes that influence ecological responses, beyond those related to photosynthetic pathway alone. Hyperspectral leaf reflectance can provide an integrated measure of covarying leaf traits that may result from phylogenetic trait conservatism and/or environmental conditions. Understanding whether spectra-trait relationships are lineage specific or reflect environmental variation across sites is necessary for using hyperspectral reflectance to predict plant responses to environmental changes across spatial scales. We measured hyperspectral leaf reflectance (400–2400 nm) and 12 structural, biochemical, and physiological leaf traits from five grass-dominated sites spanning the Great Plains of North America. We assessed if variation in leaf reflectance spectra among grass species is explained more by evolutionary lineage (as captured by tribes or subfamilies), photosynthetic pathway (C3 or C4), or site differences. We then determined whether leaf spectra can be used to predict leaf traits within and across lineages. Our results using redundancy analysis ordination (RDA) show that grass tribe identity explained more variation in leaf spectra (adjusted R2 = 0.12) than photosynthetic pathway, which explained little variation in leaf spectra (adjusted R2 = 0.00). Furthermore, leaf reflectance from the same tribe across multiple sites was more similar than leaf reflectance from the same site across tribes (adjusted R2 = 0.12 and 0.08, respectively). Across all sites and species, trait predictions based on spectra ranged considerably in predictive accuracies (R2 = 0.65 to <0.01), but R2 was >0.80 for certain lineages and sites. The relationship between Vcmax, a measure of photosynthetic capacity, and spectra was particularly promising. Chloridoideae, a lineage more common at drier sites, appears to have distinct spectra-trait relationships compared with other lineages. Overall, our results show that evolutionary relatedness explains more variation in grass leaf spectra than photosynthetic pathway or site, but consideration of lineage- and site-specific trait relationships is needed to interpret spectral variation across large environmental gradients.

Abstract Image

禾草叶片的高光谱反射率随进化谱系的变化大于随地点的变化
为了预测广阔环境尺度下的生态响应,禾本科植物通常根据光合途径分为两大类功能类型。然而,密切相关的物种可能具有独特的解剖和生理属性,影响生态反应,而不仅仅是与光合途径有关。高光谱叶片反射率可以提供一种综合的叶片共变性状的测量方法,这种共变性状可能是由系统发育性状保守性和/或环境条件造成的。了解光谱性状关系是谱系特异性的,还是反映了不同地点的环境变化,对于利用高光谱反射率预测植物对不同空间尺度环境变化的响应是必要的。我们测量了北美大平原上5个草为主的地点的叶片高光谱反射率(400-2400 nm)和12个结构、生化和生理性状。我们评估了不同草种之间叶片反射光谱的变化是否更多地由进化谱系(由部落或亚科捕获)、光合途径(C3或C4)或地点差异来解释。然后,我们确定叶片光谱是否可以用于预测株系内和跨株系的叶片性状。利用冗余分析排序(RDA)分析结果表明,草族身份对叶片光谱的解释(调整R2 = 0.12)大于光合途径,而光合途径对叶片光谱的解释较小(调整R2 = 0.00)。此外,同一部落不同地点的叶片反射率比同一部落不同地点的叶片反射率更相似(调整后的R2分别为0.12和0.08)。在所有的地点和物种中,基于光谱的性状预测的预测精度相差很大(R2 = 0.65至<;0.01),但对于某些谱系和地点,R2为>;0.80。测量光合能力的Vcmax和光谱之间的关系特别有希望。Chloridoideae,一个在干旱地区更常见的谱系,与其他谱系相比似乎有明显的光谱性状关系。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,与光合途径或位点相比,进化亲缘关系解释了更多的草叶光谱变化,但需要考虑谱系和位点特异性性状关系来解释大环境梯度下的光谱变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信