Structuring Electronic Brainstorming Tasks to Improve Group Creativity: How Structuring Serially Can Benefit Idea Elaboration

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Baptiste Van Eeckhout, Nicolas Michinov, Karine Le Rudulier
{"title":"Structuring Electronic Brainstorming Tasks to Improve Group Creativity: How Structuring Serially Can Benefit Idea Elaboration","authors":"Baptiste Van Eeckhout,&nbsp;Nicolas Michinov,&nbsp;Karine Le Rudulier","doi":"10.1002/jocb.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>For several decades, brainstorming in groups and its variants have been widely examined in research as a technique to produce ideas. The way to stimulate elaboration by linking ideas to those previously given by others during a brainstorming session is a challenge for researchers and practitioners aiming to go beyond idea generation. Despite Osborn's (1953, 1963) rules inviting participants to build on ideas of their group members to produce their own, until recently very few studies have explicitly examined idea elaboration and its determinants. The present study aimed to investigate how structuring an electronic brainstorming task using a digital environment to produce ideas freely or serially might influence the elaboration of ideas in groups. A multilevel modeling analysis revealed that, independently of the groups, the quantity and quality of ideas produced, serial brainstorming led to a greater elaboration of ideas than free brainstorming. These findings provide the initial empirical evidence about the efficacy of structuring electronic brainstorming in a serial mode to stimulate idea elaboration in groups.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For several decades, brainstorming in groups and its variants have been widely examined in research as a technique to produce ideas. The way to stimulate elaboration by linking ideas to those previously given by others during a brainstorming session is a challenge for researchers and practitioners aiming to go beyond idea generation. Despite Osborn's (1953, 1963) rules inviting participants to build on ideas of their group members to produce their own, until recently very few studies have explicitly examined idea elaboration and its determinants. The present study aimed to investigate how structuring an electronic brainstorming task using a digital environment to produce ideas freely or serially might influence the elaboration of ideas in groups. A multilevel modeling analysis revealed that, independently of the groups, the quantity and quality of ideas produced, serial brainstorming led to a greater elaboration of ideas than free brainstorming. These findings provide the initial empirical evidence about the efficacy of structuring electronic brainstorming in a serial mode to stimulate idea elaboration in groups.

构建电子头脑风暴任务以提高团队创造力:如何连续构建有利于想法的细化
几十年来,团队头脑风暴及其变体作为一种产生想法的技术在研究中得到了广泛的检验。在头脑风暴会议中,通过将想法与他人先前给出的想法联系起来,来激发详细阐述的方式,对那些想要超越想法产生的研究人员和实践者来说是一个挑战。尽管奥斯本(1953,1963)的规则邀请参与者根据小组成员的想法来产生自己的想法,但直到最近,很少有研究明确地考察了想法的阐述及其决定因素。本研究旨在探讨如何利用数字环境构建一个电子头脑风暴任务,以自由或连续地产生想法,可能会影响群体中想法的阐述。一个多层次的模型分析显示,独立于小组,产生的想法的数量和质量,连续的头脑风暴比自由的头脑风暴更能细化想法。这些发现提供了初步的经验证据,证明以串行模式构建电子头脑风暴以刺激群体中想法的阐述的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信