Hybridizing evolutionary algorithms and multiple non-linear regression technique for stream temperature modeling

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学
Mahdi Sedighkia, Zahra Moradian, Bithin Datta
{"title":"Hybridizing evolutionary algorithms and multiple non-linear regression technique for stream temperature modeling","authors":"Mahdi Sedighkia,&nbsp;Zahra Moradian,&nbsp;Bithin Datta","doi":"10.1007/s11600-024-01526-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study hybridizes the new-generation evolutionary algorithms and the nonlinear regression technique for stream temperature modeling and compares this approach with conventional gray and black box approaches under natural flow conditions, providing a comprehensive assessment. The nonlinear equation for water temperature modeling was optimized using biogeography-based optimization (BBO) and invasive weed optimization (IWO), simulated annealing algorithm (SA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). Two black box approaches, a feedforward neural network (FNN) and a long short-term memory (LSTM) network, were also employed for comparison. Additionally, an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) served as a gray box model for river thermal regimes. The models were evaluated based on accuracy, complexity, generality and interpretability. Performance metrics, such as the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), showed that the LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy (NSE = 0.96) but required significant computational resources. In contrast, evolutionary algorithm-based models offered acceptable performance while reducing the computational complexities of LSTM, with all models achieving NSE values above 0.5. Considering interpretability, accuracy and complexity, evolutionary-based nonlinear models are recommended for general applications, such as assessing thermal river habitats. For tasks requiring very high accuracy, the LSTM model is preferred, while ANFIS provides a balanced trade-off between accuracy and interpretability, making it suitable for engineers and ecologists. While all models demonstrate similar generality, this model is developed for a specific location. For other locations, independent models with a similar architecture would need to be developed. Ultimately, the choice of model depends on specific objectives and available resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"73 3","pages":"2863 - 2878"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11600-024-01526-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-024-01526-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study hybridizes the new-generation evolutionary algorithms and the nonlinear regression technique for stream temperature modeling and compares this approach with conventional gray and black box approaches under natural flow conditions, providing a comprehensive assessment. The nonlinear equation for water temperature modeling was optimized using biogeography-based optimization (BBO) and invasive weed optimization (IWO), simulated annealing algorithm (SA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). Two black box approaches, a feedforward neural network (FNN) and a long short-term memory (LSTM) network, were also employed for comparison. Additionally, an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) served as a gray box model for river thermal regimes. The models were evaluated based on accuracy, complexity, generality and interpretability. Performance metrics, such as the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), showed that the LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy (NSE = 0.96) but required significant computational resources. In contrast, evolutionary algorithm-based models offered acceptable performance while reducing the computational complexities of LSTM, with all models achieving NSE values above 0.5. Considering interpretability, accuracy and complexity, evolutionary-based nonlinear models are recommended for general applications, such as assessing thermal river habitats. For tasks requiring very high accuracy, the LSTM model is preferred, while ANFIS provides a balanced trade-off between accuracy and interpretability, making it suitable for engineers and ecologists. While all models demonstrate similar generality, this model is developed for a specific location. For other locations, independent models with a similar architecture would need to be developed. Ultimately, the choice of model depends on specific objectives and available resources.

混合进化算法与多元非线性回归技术在河流温度模拟中的应用
本研究将新一代进化算法与非线性回归技术相结合用于河流温度建模,并将该方法与传统的自然流动条件下的灰盒和黑盒方法进行了比较,提供了一个全面的评估。采用生物地理优化(BBO)、入侵杂草优化(IWO)、模拟退火算法(SA)和粒子群优化(PSO)对水温模型的非线性方程进行了优化。两种黑盒方法,前馈神经网络(FNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)网络,也被用于比较。此外,自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)作为河流热状态的灰盒模型。对模型进行了准确性、复杂性、通用性和可解释性评价。Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)等性能指标表明,LSTM模型达到了最高的精度(NSE = 0.96),但需要大量的计算资源。相比之下,基于进化算法的模型提供了可接受的性能,同时降低了LSTM的计算复杂性,所有模型的NSE值都在0.5以上。考虑到可解释性、准确性和复杂性,基于进化的非线性模型被推荐用于一般应用,例如评估热河生境。对于需要非常高精度的任务,LSTM模型是首选,而ANFIS在准确性和可解释性之间提供了一个平衡的权衡,使其适合工程师和生态学家。虽然所有模型都显示出类似的通用性,但该模型是为特定位置开发的。对于其他位置,需要开发具有类似体系结构的独立模型。最终,模型的选择取决于特定的目标和可用的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信