{"title":"The holistic process sustainability index framework","authors":"Mitchell Huffman, Qingsheng Wang, Faisal Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The world population now exceeds 8 billion people, and the demand for goods, energy, services, and food continues to grow. As large-scale processes meet these demands, sustainability becomes ever more vital for the long-term health of humans and the environment. To promote the most sustainable solutions in decision-making, there must be a means of comparing the sustainability of different processes. A quantitative measure of sustainability would allow for internal benchmarking, design assessment, and regulatory guidance. Therefore, the Holistic Process Sustainability Index (HPSI) framework is proposed, which provides a basis for translating the qualitative nature of sustainability into a quantitative form. This framework seeks to address the lack of process safety considerations in sustainability assessment and the lack of quantified connections between triple bottom line pillars. The foundation of this framework is established using an expanded triple bottom line: economics, environment, society, and safety are the key pillars. Indicators were then established to reflect the driving forces, pressures, states, exposures, and effects toward process sustainability. These indicators were analyzed using interpretive structural modeling to understand how indicators within one pillar of sustainability affect those from other pillars. The application of the framework was demonstrated through the development of the HPSI. Therefore, the proposed framework provides the basis for a dynamic sustainability metric that considers sustainability's economic, environmental, societal, and safety aspects while properly accounting for the interrelations between these different aspects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 105652"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095042302500110X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The world population now exceeds 8 billion people, and the demand for goods, energy, services, and food continues to grow. As large-scale processes meet these demands, sustainability becomes ever more vital for the long-term health of humans and the environment. To promote the most sustainable solutions in decision-making, there must be a means of comparing the sustainability of different processes. A quantitative measure of sustainability would allow for internal benchmarking, design assessment, and regulatory guidance. Therefore, the Holistic Process Sustainability Index (HPSI) framework is proposed, which provides a basis for translating the qualitative nature of sustainability into a quantitative form. This framework seeks to address the lack of process safety considerations in sustainability assessment and the lack of quantified connections between triple bottom line pillars. The foundation of this framework is established using an expanded triple bottom line: economics, environment, society, and safety are the key pillars. Indicators were then established to reflect the driving forces, pressures, states, exposures, and effects toward process sustainability. These indicators were analyzed using interpretive structural modeling to understand how indicators within one pillar of sustainability affect those from other pillars. The application of the framework was demonstrated through the development of the HPSI. Therefore, the proposed framework provides the basis for a dynamic sustainability metric that considers sustainability's economic, environmental, societal, and safety aspects while properly accounting for the interrelations between these different aspects.
期刊介绍:
The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.