Experimental study on the leakage characteristics and flow prediction of freely propagating random fractures in CO2 transportation pipelines

IF 5.5 0 ENERGY & FUELS
Yanwei Hu , Lei Chen , Zhangao Cao , Shuai Yu , Fanfan Qiao , Zhenxi Liu , Xingqing Yan , Jianliang Yu
{"title":"Experimental study on the leakage characteristics and flow prediction of freely propagating random fractures in CO2 transportation pipelines","authors":"Yanwei Hu ,&nbsp;Lei Chen ,&nbsp;Zhangao Cao ,&nbsp;Shuai Yu ,&nbsp;Fanfan Qiao ,&nbsp;Zhenxi Liu ,&nbsp;Xingqing Yan ,&nbsp;Jianliang Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the risk of pipeline leakage is crucial in the carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) process. Attention should be paid to the characteristics of fracture leakage resulting from external force-induced defects in transportation pipelines. Existing experimental and numerical simulation studies generally simplify leak orifices into circular or rectangular shapes, and no research has yet addressed the behavior of freely expanding fractures. A novel experimental setup was developed to investigate the leakage behavior of fractures under CO<sub>2</sub> flow and record the pressure and temperature variations during the leakage process. This paper analyzes the leakage characteristics of three different scales of random fractures and provides a detailed calculation of leakage rates. Results show that the maximum leakage rate through the slit was 11.34 kg/s. Despite the extended leakage duration, the internal fluid temperature within the pipeline remained nearly constant, and the lowest recorded temperature in the leakage zone was only −18.025 °C, indicating minimal leakage risk. The medium-scale fracture posed the greatest low-temperature risk, with an observed leakage zone temperature of −61.834 °C. The full-scale fracture exhibited the greatest high-pressure impact risk based on visible cloud analysis. The lowest internal pipeline temperature was −46.96 °C, which significantly affected the internal temperature of the pipeline. The rapid cooling rate also presented the highest potential risk for low-temperature embrittlement. Comparing experimental leakage volumes to the predictive model, the slit's experimental value was 101.14 kg, the mid-scale fracture was 122.908 kg, and the full-scale fracture was 109.004 kg. The corresponding predicted values were 104.248 kg, with an error of 3.07 %, 126.09 kg with an error of 2.59 %, and 111.542 kg with an error of 2.33 %. Leakage flow rates can compensate for the lack of experimental CO<sub>2</sub> leakage data in classical flow calculation models. In the analysis of the leakage process, the leakage coefficient C<sub>d</sub> was derived to be 1.9. The relative errors between experimental and predicted flow rates were found to be 3.07 %, 2.59 %, and 2.33 %, respectively. These small error values provide a basis for calculating leakage flow rates and controlling risk time in CO<sub>2</sub> transportation pipelines where fracture formations occur. The lack of fundamental data on leakage rates from fracture-like orifices has been addressed, contributing to improvements in predictive models. This provides a method to enhance the accuracy of leakage rate predictions in real-world scenarios involving non-circular orifices and offers a scientific basis for understanding the risk characteristics of pipeline fractures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100568,"journal":{"name":"Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 205640"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949908925001049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the risk of pipeline leakage is crucial in the carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) process. Attention should be paid to the characteristics of fracture leakage resulting from external force-induced defects in transportation pipelines. Existing experimental and numerical simulation studies generally simplify leak orifices into circular or rectangular shapes, and no research has yet addressed the behavior of freely expanding fractures. A novel experimental setup was developed to investigate the leakage behavior of fractures under CO2 flow and record the pressure and temperature variations during the leakage process. This paper analyzes the leakage characteristics of three different scales of random fractures and provides a detailed calculation of leakage rates. Results show that the maximum leakage rate through the slit was 11.34 kg/s. Despite the extended leakage duration, the internal fluid temperature within the pipeline remained nearly constant, and the lowest recorded temperature in the leakage zone was only −18.025 °C, indicating minimal leakage risk. The medium-scale fracture posed the greatest low-temperature risk, with an observed leakage zone temperature of −61.834 °C. The full-scale fracture exhibited the greatest high-pressure impact risk based on visible cloud analysis. The lowest internal pipeline temperature was −46.96 °C, which significantly affected the internal temperature of the pipeline. The rapid cooling rate also presented the highest potential risk for low-temperature embrittlement. Comparing experimental leakage volumes to the predictive model, the slit's experimental value was 101.14 kg, the mid-scale fracture was 122.908 kg, and the full-scale fracture was 109.004 kg. The corresponding predicted values were 104.248 kg, with an error of 3.07 %, 126.09 kg with an error of 2.59 %, and 111.542 kg with an error of 2.33 %. Leakage flow rates can compensate for the lack of experimental CO2 leakage data in classical flow calculation models. In the analysis of the leakage process, the leakage coefficient Cd was derived to be 1.9. The relative errors between experimental and predicted flow rates were found to be 3.07 %, 2.59 %, and 2.33 %, respectively. These small error values provide a basis for calculating leakage flow rates and controlling risk time in CO2 transportation pipelines where fracture formations occur. The lack of fundamental data on leakage rates from fracture-like orifices has been addressed, contributing to improvements in predictive models. This provides a method to enhance the accuracy of leakage rate predictions in real-world scenarios involving non-circular orifices and offers a scientific basis for understanding the risk characteristics of pipeline fractures.

Abstract Image

CO2输送管道自由扩展随机裂缝泄漏特性及流量预测试验研究
了解管道泄漏的风险在碳捕集、利用和封存(CCUS)过程中至关重要。应注意运输管道因外力缺陷引起的断裂泄漏的特点。现有的实验和数值模拟研究通常将泄漏孔简化为圆形或矩形,尚未有研究解决自由扩展裂缝的行为。为了研究裂缝在CO2流动下的泄漏行为,并记录泄漏过程中的压力和温度变化,建立了一种新的实验装置。本文分析了三种不同尺度随机裂缝的泄漏特征,并给出了泄漏率的详细计算。结果表明,通过狭缝的最大泄漏速率为11.34 kg/s。尽管泄漏持续时间延长,但管道内部流体温度基本保持不变,泄漏区记录的最低温度仅为- 18.025℃,泄漏风险最小。中等规模裂缝的低温风险最大,渗漏区温度为- 61.834℃。基于可见云分析,全尺寸裂缝表现出最大的高压冲击风险。管道内部温度最低为- 46.96℃,对管道内部温度影响较大。快速的冷却速度也是低温脆化的最大潜在风险。将实验泄漏体积与预测模型进行比较,狭缝实验值为101.14 kg,中型裂缝为122.908 kg,全尺寸裂缝为109.004 kg。相应的预测值分别为104.248 kg,误差3.07%,126.09 kg,误差2.59%,111.542 kg,误差2.33%。泄漏流量可以弥补经典流量计算模型中CO2泄漏实验数据的不足。在泄漏过程分析中,导出泄漏系数Cd为1.9。实验流量与预测流量的相对误差分别为3.07%、2.59%和2.33%。这些小误差值为裂缝形成的CO2输送管道的泄漏流量计算和风险时间控制提供了依据。关于类裂缝孔口泄漏率的基础数据的缺乏已经得到解决,有助于改进预测模型。这为提高非圆孔实际情况下泄漏率预测的准确性提供了一种方法,并为理解管道裂缝的风险特征提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信