Quantifying voluntary knee strength deficits and muscular contribution to torque in an anterior cruciate ligament-injured adolescent population using a musculoskeletal model

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Teresa E. Flaxman , Mohammad S. Shourijeh , Sasha Carsen , Zachary A. Flahaut , Nicholas Romanchuk , Michael J. Del Bel , Daniel L. Benoit
{"title":"Quantifying voluntary knee strength deficits and muscular contribution to torque in an anterior cruciate ligament-injured adolescent population using a musculoskeletal model","authors":"Teresa E. Flaxman ,&nbsp;Mohammad S. Shourijeh ,&nbsp;Sasha Carsen ,&nbsp;Zachary A. Flahaut ,&nbsp;Nicholas Romanchuk ,&nbsp;Michael J. Del Bel ,&nbsp;Daniel L. Benoit","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surface electromyography is commonly used to elucidate the effect of anterior cruciate ligament injury on neuromuscular function. For comparisons, electromyography is normalized to a known value, such as peak activation during maximum voluntary isometric contractions. However, a knee injury may compromise one's ability to achieve a true maximal effort. A simple musculoskeletal model may provide insight into injury related strength deficits.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-nine anterior cruciate ligament injured adolescents (14-16 years; 25 females) and 39 matched controls (25 females) completed maximum voluntary isometric knee extension and flexion contractions on an isokinetic dynamometer. A participant-specific musculoskeletal model used normalized electromyography of knee joint muscles to determine a theoretically ideal torque for each contraction type, assuming agonist muscles were fully activated. Strength deficit ratios expressed peak experimental torque relative to theoretically ideal torque. Individual muscle contribution to experimental torque were also computed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Injured participants demonstrated significantly lower experimental torque than controls, with percent group mean difference of 17.8 % for knee extension (Injured:2.33 ± 0.89 vs Controls:2.88 ± 0.56 Nm/kg) and 16.7 % for flexion (Injured:1.22 ± 0.44 vs Controls:1.49 ± 0.27 Nm/kg). Group mean differences in strength ratios reduced to 6.3 % for extension (Injured:0.69 ± 0.11 vs Controls:0.74 ± 0.08) and 10.0 % for flexion (Injured:0.56 ± 0.15 vs Controls:0.63 ± 0.12). No between-group differences in muscular contribution to peak experimental extension torque were observed. Injured participants had lower medial gastrocnemius percent contribution to peak experimental flexion torque.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Isometric strength tests may not adequately identify strength deficits in adolescent anterior cruciate injured populations. Simplified modelling frameworks may be more appropriate for evaluating the relationship between neuromuscular control and functional outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 106521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surface electromyography is commonly used to elucidate the effect of anterior cruciate ligament injury on neuromuscular function. For comparisons, electromyography is normalized to a known value, such as peak activation during maximum voluntary isometric contractions. However, a knee injury may compromise one's ability to achieve a true maximal effort. A simple musculoskeletal model may provide insight into injury related strength deficits.

Methods

Thirty-nine anterior cruciate ligament injured adolescents (14-16 years; 25 females) and 39 matched controls (25 females) completed maximum voluntary isometric knee extension and flexion contractions on an isokinetic dynamometer. A participant-specific musculoskeletal model used normalized electromyography of knee joint muscles to determine a theoretically ideal torque for each contraction type, assuming agonist muscles were fully activated. Strength deficit ratios expressed peak experimental torque relative to theoretically ideal torque. Individual muscle contribution to experimental torque were also computed.

Findings

Injured participants demonstrated significantly lower experimental torque than controls, with percent group mean difference of 17.8 % for knee extension (Injured:2.33 ± 0.89 vs Controls:2.88 ± 0.56 Nm/kg) and 16.7 % for flexion (Injured:1.22 ± 0.44 vs Controls:1.49 ± 0.27 Nm/kg). Group mean differences in strength ratios reduced to 6.3 % for extension (Injured:0.69 ± 0.11 vs Controls:0.74 ± 0.08) and 10.0 % for flexion (Injured:0.56 ± 0.15 vs Controls:0.63 ± 0.12). No between-group differences in muscular contribution to peak experimental extension torque were observed. Injured participants had lower medial gastrocnemius percent contribution to peak experimental flexion torque.

Interpretation

Isometric strength tests may not adequately identify strength deficits in adolescent anterior cruciate injured populations. Simplified modelling frameworks may be more appropriate for evaluating the relationship between neuromuscular control and functional outcomes.
使用肌肉骨骼模型量化前交叉韧带损伤青少年人群的自愿膝关节力量缺陷和肌肉对扭矩的贡献
背景表面肌电图常用于研究前交叉韧带损伤对神经肌肉功能的影响。为了比较,肌电图被归一化为一个已知值,例如在最大自主等长收缩期间的峰值激活。然而,膝盖受伤可能会影响一个人达到真正最大努力的能力。一个简单的肌肉骨骼模型可以提供有关损伤相关的力量缺陷的见解。方法39例14 ~ 16岁青少年前交叉韧带损伤;25名女性)和39名匹配的对照组(25名女性)在等速测功机上完成了最大自主等速膝关节伸展和屈曲收缩。参与者特有的肌肉骨骼模型使用膝关节肌肉的标准化肌电图来确定每种收缩类型的理论上理想扭矩,假设激动剂肌肉完全激活。强度亏缺比表示相对于理论理想扭矩的峰值实验扭矩。还计算了个体肌肉对实验扭矩的贡献。研究发现,受伤的参与者表现出明显低于对照组的实验扭矩,膝关节伸展(受伤:2.33±0.89 vs对照组:2.88±0.56 Nm/kg)和屈曲(受伤:1.22±0.44 vs对照组:1.49±0.27 Nm/kg)的百分比组平均差异为17.8%。组平均强度比差异在伸直组降低至6.3%(受伤组:0.69±0.11 vs对照组:0.74±0.08),屈曲组降低至10.0%(受伤组:0.56±0.15 vs对照组:0.63±0.12)。肌肉对实验拉伸扭矩峰值的贡献没有组间差异。受伤的参与者有较低的腓肠肌内侧贡献峰值实验屈曲扭矩的百分比。解释:等长强度测试可能不能充分识别青少年前十字韧带损伤人群的力量缺陷。简化的建模框架可能更适合评估神经肌肉控制和功能结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信