Byeonghyeon Park , Sangmin Lee , Eunjee Lee , Myeongji Kim , Hee Seo
{"title":"Method for determining primary radiation shielding thickness of industrial X-ray-generating devices","authors":"Byeonghyeon Park , Sangmin Lee , Eunjee Lee , Myeongji Kim , Hee Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The United States National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/Health Physics Society (HPS) reports typically are used as references during shielding evaluations of industrial X-ray-generating devices (XGDs). Considering the early date of publication of these reports, the types of some of the x-ray generators used in their experiments (i.e., generators for diagnosis, not industrial applications), the lack of available voltage types, and the non-intuitive application of the formulae, it is necessary to validate and improve the existing evaluation methods and data in consideration of the characteristics of industrial devices that are widely used today. To this end, we selected a representative industrial X-ray generator and measured its dose rate using a dose-rate meter with varying lead shielding thicknesses and tube voltages. By statistically analyzing the relationship between these variables, new formulae for shield-thickness evaluation according to fine tube-voltage increments, along with all of the related data, were derived. By using the information obtained in this study, the required lead thicknesses for industrial XGDs can be determined at different tube voltages in order to satisfy users’ dose-rate requirements and ensure the radiation safety of workers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8096,"journal":{"name":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 111862"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804325002076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The United States National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/Health Physics Society (HPS) reports typically are used as references during shielding evaluations of industrial X-ray-generating devices (XGDs). Considering the early date of publication of these reports, the types of some of the x-ray generators used in their experiments (i.e., generators for diagnosis, not industrial applications), the lack of available voltage types, and the non-intuitive application of the formulae, it is necessary to validate and improve the existing evaluation methods and data in consideration of the characteristics of industrial devices that are widely used today. To this end, we selected a representative industrial X-ray generator and measured its dose rate using a dose-rate meter with varying lead shielding thicknesses and tube voltages. By statistically analyzing the relationship between these variables, new formulae for shield-thickness evaluation according to fine tube-voltage increments, along with all of the related data, were derived. By using the information obtained in this study, the required lead thicknesses for industrial XGDs can be determined at different tube voltages in order to satisfy users’ dose-rate requirements and ensure the radiation safety of workers.
期刊介绍:
Applied Radiation and Isotopes provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and peaceful application of nuclear, radiation and radionuclide techniques in chemistry, physics, biochemistry, biology, medicine, security, engineering and in the earth, planetary and environmental sciences, all including dosimetry. Nuclear techniques are defined in the broadest sense and both experimental and theoretical papers are welcome. They include the development and use of α- and β-particles, X-rays and γ-rays, neutrons and other nuclear particles and radiations from all sources, including radionuclides, synchrotron sources, cyclotrons and reactors and from the natural environment.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria.
Papers dealing with radiation processing, i.e., where radiation is used to bring about a biological, chemical or physical change in a material, should be directed to our sister journal Radiation Physics and Chemistry.