Prediction of rock-breaking forces of tunnel boring machine (TBM) disc cutter based on machine learning methods

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Qi Geng , Yufeng Huang , Jianxun Chen , Xuebin Wang , Weiwei Liu , Yanbin Luo , Zeyu Zhang , Min Ye
{"title":"Prediction of rock-breaking forces of tunnel boring machine (TBM) disc cutter based on machine learning methods","authors":"Qi Geng ,&nbsp;Yufeng Huang ,&nbsp;Jianxun Chen ,&nbsp;Xuebin Wang ,&nbsp;Weiwei Liu ,&nbsp;Yanbin Luo ,&nbsp;Zeyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Min Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rock-breaking forces are crucial indicators in evaluating the performance of tunnel boring machine (TBM) disc cutters, impacting cutter selection, cutterhead design, and penetration parameters. To develop an accurate and reliable prediction model for the rock-breaking forces of TBM disc cutters, a model database containing 414 typical samples was constructed based on the widely approved full-scale linear rock-breaking tests. The model takes the following inputs: uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), cutter diameter (<em>D</em>), cutter ring tip width (<em>T</em>), penetration depth (<em>P</em>), and cutter spacing (<em>S</em>). The outputs are the normal and rolling rock-breaking forces. Four machine learning methods, i.e., back-propagation neural network (BP), support vector regression (SVR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forest (RF) were applied for the prediction model establishment and evaluation. Comparative analyses were performed against three well-known theoretical, semi-empirical, and empirical prediction formulas respectively. The results demonstrated that, despite the relatively small dataset, the predicted normal forces from BP, SVR, KNN and RF models achieved R-Square (R<sup>2</sup>) values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.77 and 0.89, respectively, significantly outperforming the other three prediction formulas. This confirmed the generalization and accuracy of machine learning algorithms. Among these models, the RF model showed the most stable predictive performance and was less sensitive to outliers. Further evaluations were performed using field penetration test data obtained from four TBM projects. Results showed that the machine learning models consistently achieved high prediction accuracy, whereas the three theoretical or empirical formulas were more affected by rock strength variations, and exhibited relatively poorer performance. The successful application and evaluation offered a valuable tool to assist TBM cutterhead/cutter design and operational parameters selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106682"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825003207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rock-breaking forces are crucial indicators in evaluating the performance of tunnel boring machine (TBM) disc cutters, impacting cutter selection, cutterhead design, and penetration parameters. To develop an accurate and reliable prediction model for the rock-breaking forces of TBM disc cutters, a model database containing 414 typical samples was constructed based on the widely approved full-scale linear rock-breaking tests. The model takes the following inputs: uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), cutter diameter (D), cutter ring tip width (T), penetration depth (P), and cutter spacing (S). The outputs are the normal and rolling rock-breaking forces. Four machine learning methods, i.e., back-propagation neural network (BP), support vector regression (SVR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forest (RF) were applied for the prediction model establishment and evaluation. Comparative analyses were performed against three well-known theoretical, semi-empirical, and empirical prediction formulas respectively. The results demonstrated that, despite the relatively small dataset, the predicted normal forces from BP, SVR, KNN and RF models achieved R-Square (R2) values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.77 and 0.89, respectively, significantly outperforming the other three prediction formulas. This confirmed the generalization and accuracy of machine learning algorithms. Among these models, the RF model showed the most stable predictive performance and was less sensitive to outliers. Further evaluations were performed using field penetration test data obtained from four TBM projects. Results showed that the machine learning models consistently achieved high prediction accuracy, whereas the three theoretical or empirical formulas were more affected by rock strength variations, and exhibited relatively poorer performance. The successful application and evaluation offered a valuable tool to assist TBM cutterhead/cutter design and operational parameters selection.
基于机器学习方法的隧道掘进机盘式切割机破岩力预测
破岩力是评价隧道掘进机盘式刀具性能的重要指标,影响着刀具的选择、刀盘的设计和掘进参数。为了建立准确可靠的TBM盘式切割机破岩力预测模型,基于国内外广泛认可的全尺寸线性破岩试验,建立了包含414个典型样品的模型数据库。该模型采用以下输入:单轴抗压强度(UCS)、巴西抗拉强度(BTS)、刀具直径(D)、刀具环尖宽度(T)、侵彻深度(P)和刀具间距(S),输出为法向和滚动破岩力。采用反向传播神经网络(BP)、支持向量回归(SVR)、k近邻(KNN)和随机森林(RF)四种机器学习方法建立预测模型并进行评价。分别对三个著名的理论、半经验和经验预测公式进行了比较分析。结果表明,尽管数据集相对较小,但BP、SVR、KNN和RF模型预测的正态力的r平方(R2)值分别为0.82、0.81、0.77和0.89,显著优于其他3种预测公式。这证实了机器学习算法的泛化和准确性。在这些模型中,RF模型表现出最稳定的预测性能,对异常值的敏感性较低。进一步的评估使用了从四个TBM项目中获得的现场穿透测试数据。结果表明,机器学习模型具有较高的预测精度,而三种理论或经验公式受岩石强度变化的影响较大,表现相对较差。成功的应用和评估为TBM刀盘/刀具的设计和操作参数的选择提供了有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信