Ximena Ferrara Muñiz , Micaela Encinas , Wanderson Marques da Silva , Sergio Gabriel Garbaccio , Carlos Javier Garro , Romina Ayelén Sammarruco , Hugo Adrián Carignano , María Verónica Bianco , Ángel Adrián Cataldi , Martín José Zumárraga , María Emilia Eirin
{"title":"Humoral and cell-mediated immune response against the Mce2B (Rv0590/Mb0605) cell-wall protein of Mycobacterium bovis","authors":"Ximena Ferrara Muñiz , Micaela Encinas , Wanderson Marques da Silva , Sergio Gabriel Garbaccio , Carlos Javier Garro , Romina Ayelén Sammarruco , Hugo Adrián Carignano , María Verónica Bianco , Ángel Adrián Cataldi , Martín José Zumárraga , María Emilia Eirin","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2025.110938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bovine tuberculosis is a zoonotic disease with global distribution. Improved diagnosis is essential thus, research into new diagnostic reagents is valuable. The Mce2B recombinant protein was evaluated as an inducer of immune response The research involved naturally infected cattle with different immunological profiles. Moderate homology (≥ 40 %) between Mce2B of <em>M. bovis</em> and homologous proteins in non-tuberculous mycobacteria was corroborated, as well as the presence of epitopes restricted by the bovine leucocyte antigen class II. Despite this prediction, cell-mediated responses to Mce2B were undetectable in caudal fold tuberculin skin test (CF-TST) positive and non-infected animals. In CF-TST false-negative cattle, a minimal cell-mediated response was observed (5 %; IC 95 %: 0.13–24.9), lower than that elicited by PPDB (35 %; IC 95 %: 15,4–59,2) (<em>p</em> = 0.046) but identical to the recombinant Fusion Protein including ESAT-6, CFP-10, EspC antigens (5 %; IC 95 %: 34.9–96.8). Marginal humoral response (33.3 %; IC 95 %: 4.3–77.7) was observed in the non-infected group. These findings demonstrate that the Mce2B protein is not a suitable antigen for bovine tuberculosis diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 110938"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242725000583","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis is a zoonotic disease with global distribution. Improved diagnosis is essential thus, research into new diagnostic reagents is valuable. The Mce2B recombinant protein was evaluated as an inducer of immune response The research involved naturally infected cattle with different immunological profiles. Moderate homology (≥ 40 %) between Mce2B of M. bovis and homologous proteins in non-tuberculous mycobacteria was corroborated, as well as the presence of epitopes restricted by the bovine leucocyte antigen class II. Despite this prediction, cell-mediated responses to Mce2B were undetectable in caudal fold tuberculin skin test (CF-TST) positive and non-infected animals. In CF-TST false-negative cattle, a minimal cell-mediated response was observed (5 %; IC 95 %: 0.13–24.9), lower than that elicited by PPDB (35 %; IC 95 %: 15,4–59,2) (p = 0.046) but identical to the recombinant Fusion Protein including ESAT-6, CFP-10, EspC antigens (5 %; IC 95 %: 34.9–96.8). Marginal humoral response (33.3 %; IC 95 %: 4.3–77.7) was observed in the non-infected group. These findings demonstrate that the Mce2B protein is not a suitable antigen for bovine tuberculosis diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease.
Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above.
The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.