Riasad Bin Mahbub , Michele L. Reba , Benjamin R.K. Runkle
{"title":"Magnitude, drivers, and patterns of gross primary productivity of rice in Arkansas using a calibrated vegetation photosynthesis model","authors":"Riasad Bin Mahbub , Michele L. Reba , Benjamin R.K. Runkle","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An estimate of the gross primary productivity (GPP) of rice fields is instrumental for understanding both their harvest yield and landscape greenhouse gas dynamics. Rice contributes $1.7 billion annually to Arkansas’s economy, however, there is a lack of understanding of the spatial variation of rice’s GPP and its predictors. We employ the satellite-based vegetation photosynthesis model (VPM) to estimate GPP for Arkansas rice cropland and evaluate our model findings against 16 site-seasons in-situ data (eddy covariance; EC). At the site scale (individual ∼10–30 ha rice fields), the results evaluated against 16 site-seasons revealed that the VPM with site-measured meteorological information (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.6, mean absolute error (MAE) = 3.68 g C <em>m</em><sup>−2</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>, and bias = -0.33 g C <em>m</em><sup>−2</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>) only slightly outperforms the VPM based on gridded meteorological information (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.57, MAE = 3.75 g C <em>m</em><sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>, and bias = -0.22 g C <em>m</em><sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>). Across the state’s rice fields (2008–2020), the mean photosynthetic carbon uptake of Arkansas rice fields was modeled as 1801 ± 288 g C <em>m</em><sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. Across rice production ecological zones, significant differences in the enhanced vegetation index and land surface water index between the Grand Prairie and Middle Delta regions, despite similar temperature and photosynthetic active radiation, suggest that regional agronomic and soil differences are more influential on GPP variation than climatic factors. The modeled annual cumulative GPP was positively correlated (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.16) with the county-scale yield. Our results demonstrated the potential importance of agronomic practices in the Grand Prairie region and enhanced vegetation index for understanding the spatial variation of GPP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"369 ","pages":"Article 110583"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325002035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An estimate of the gross primary productivity (GPP) of rice fields is instrumental for understanding both their harvest yield and landscape greenhouse gas dynamics. Rice contributes $1.7 billion annually to Arkansas’s economy, however, there is a lack of understanding of the spatial variation of rice’s GPP and its predictors. We employ the satellite-based vegetation photosynthesis model (VPM) to estimate GPP for Arkansas rice cropland and evaluate our model findings against 16 site-seasons in-situ data (eddy covariance; EC). At the site scale (individual ∼10–30 ha rice fields), the results evaluated against 16 site-seasons revealed that the VPM with site-measured meteorological information (R2 = 0.6, mean absolute error (MAE) = 3.68 g C m−2 day-1, and bias = -0.33 g C m−2 day-1) only slightly outperforms the VPM based on gridded meteorological information (R2 = 0.57, MAE = 3.75 g C m−2 day−1, and bias = -0.22 g C m−2 day−1). Across the state’s rice fields (2008–2020), the mean photosynthetic carbon uptake of Arkansas rice fields was modeled as 1801 ± 288 g C m−2 year−1. Across rice production ecological zones, significant differences in the enhanced vegetation index and land surface water index between the Grand Prairie and Middle Delta regions, despite similar temperature and photosynthetic active radiation, suggest that regional agronomic and soil differences are more influential on GPP variation than climatic factors. The modeled annual cumulative GPP was positively correlated (R2 = 0.16) with the county-scale yield. Our results demonstrated the potential importance of agronomic practices in the Grand Prairie region and enhanced vegetation index for understanding the spatial variation of GPP.
稻田总初级生产力(GPP)的估算有助于了解稻田的收成和景观温室气体动态。水稻每年为阿肯色州的经济贡献17亿美元,然而,人们对水稻GPP的空间变化及其预测因素缺乏了解。我们采用基于卫星的植被光合作用模型(VPM)估算阿肯色州稻田的GPP,并根据16个站点季节的原位数据(涡动相关;EC)。在站点尺度(单个~ 10-30公顷稻田)上,对16个站点季节的评估结果表明,基于站点实测气象信息的VPM (R2 = 0.6,平均绝对误差(MAE) = 3.68 g C m−2 day-1,偏差= -0.33 g C m−2 day-1)仅略优于基于网格化气象信息的VPM (R2 = 0.57, MAE = 3.75 g C m−2 day-1,偏差= -0.22 g C m−2 day-1)。在整个州的稻田(2008-2020),阿肯色州稻田的平均光合碳吸收量被建模为1801±288 g C m−2年−1。在不同的水稻生产生态区,尽管温度和光合有效辐射相似,但大草原和中三角洲地区的植被指数和陆地地表水指数的增强差异显著,表明区域农学和土壤差异对GPP变化的影响大于气候因素。模型的年累积GPP与县域产量呈正相关(R2 = 0.16)。我们的研究结果表明,在大草原地区,农业实践和增强的植被指数对于理解GPP的空间变化具有潜在的重要性。
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.