Amara Santiesteban-Serrano , Ana Rincón , Cristina Aponte
{"title":"Does wildfire severity reduce soil multifunctionality in the short-term? A matter of depth","authors":"Amara Santiesteban-Serrano , Ana Rincón , Cristina Aponte","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-severity wildfires can alter soil properties through direct heat transfer and post-fire processes, yet soil has a high capacity to buffer these changes with depth. In this study, we assessed the short-term (three months post-fire) effects of a severe wildfire on soil functions in a <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. forest in Spain. Soil samples were collected at two depths (0–5 cm, 5–10 cm) from unburnt areas, areas burnt at low severity (intact canopies), and areas burnt at high severity (completely scorched canopies). High-severity plots were further categorized by slope (moderate/steep) to determine the potential synergistic effects of fire severity and slope. By measuring 24 soil indicators, we assessed key soil functions (e.g., carbon sequestration, soil fertility, nutrient cycling) and calculated the Effective Multifunctionality index (EMi) to capture the overall soil performance. Our results revealed that: (i) most soil functions drastically declined in the topsoil of burnt plots, but not so in the subsoil; (ii) fire reshaped the vertical stratification of soil indicators; (iii) no significant synergistic interactions were observed between high fire severity and steep slopes; (iv) the EMi, primarily driven by carbon sequestration, was significantly reduced by fire severity in the topsoil; (v) subsoil remained largely unaffected by fire. These findings underscore the short-term resilience of subsoil processes to high-severity wildfires, and highlight the importance of distinguishing aboveground fire severity from soil impacts. They also emphasize the need for targeted post-fire management strategies to support soil recovery and sustain ecosystem functionality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113500"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High-severity wildfires can alter soil properties through direct heat transfer and post-fire processes, yet soil has a high capacity to buffer these changes with depth. In this study, we assessed the short-term (three months post-fire) effects of a severe wildfire on soil functions in a Pinus sylvestris L. forest in Spain. Soil samples were collected at two depths (0–5 cm, 5–10 cm) from unburnt areas, areas burnt at low severity (intact canopies), and areas burnt at high severity (completely scorched canopies). High-severity plots were further categorized by slope (moderate/steep) to determine the potential synergistic effects of fire severity and slope. By measuring 24 soil indicators, we assessed key soil functions (e.g., carbon sequestration, soil fertility, nutrient cycling) and calculated the Effective Multifunctionality index (EMi) to capture the overall soil performance. Our results revealed that: (i) most soil functions drastically declined in the topsoil of burnt plots, but not so in the subsoil; (ii) fire reshaped the vertical stratification of soil indicators; (iii) no significant synergistic interactions were observed between high fire severity and steep slopes; (iv) the EMi, primarily driven by carbon sequestration, was significantly reduced by fire severity in the topsoil; (v) subsoil remained largely unaffected by fire. These findings underscore the short-term resilience of subsoil processes to high-severity wildfires, and highlight the importance of distinguishing aboveground fire severity from soil impacts. They also emphasize the need for targeted post-fire management strategies to support soil recovery and sustain ecosystem functionality.
高度严重的野火可以通过直接传热和火灾后的过程改变土壤性质,但土壤具有很高的缓冲这些变化的能力。在这项研究中,我们评估了严重野火对西班牙西尔维斯松林土壤功能的短期(火灾后3个月)影响。土壤样品采集于两个深度(0-5 cm, 5-10 cm),分别来自未烧焦区、低严重程度烧伤区(完整冠层)和高严重程度烧伤区(完全烧焦冠层)。根据坡度(中度/陡峭)进一步对高烈度地块进行分类,以确定烈度和坡度的潜在协同效应。通过测量24项土壤指标,我们评估了土壤的关键功能(如碳固存、土壤肥力、养分循环),并计算了有效多功能指数(EMi),以捕捉土壤的整体性能。结果表明:(1)焚烧样地表层土壤的大部分功能急剧下降,而底土则没有明显下降;(ii)火灾重塑了土壤指标的垂直分层;(iii)在高火灾严重程度和陡峭斜坡之间没有观察到显著的协同作用;(4)表层土壤的火灾严重程度显著降低了主要由碳固存驱动的电磁干扰;(v)底土基本上未受火灾影响。这些发现强调了地下过程对高强度野火的短期恢复能力,并强调了区分地上火灾严重程度和土壤影响的重要性。他们还强调需要有针对性的火灾后管理战略,以支持土壤恢复和维持生态系统功能。
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.