From Li2CO3 to Li2C2O4: Understanding Discharge Product Decomposition in Li–CO2 Batteries

IF 4.7 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR
Lixin Xiong,  and , Neil Qiang Su*, 
{"title":"From Li2CO3 to Li2C2O4: Understanding Discharge Product Decomposition in Li–CO2 Batteries","authors":"Lixin Xiong,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Neil Qiang Su*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c0083210.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c00832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Rechargeable lithium–carbon dioxide (Li–CO<sub>2</sub>) batteries are promising for CO<sub>2</sub> capture and energy storage. However, the high decomposition potential and sluggish kinetics of the discharge product Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> limit their practical development. Recent studies have identified Li<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> as an alternative with superior electrochemical decomposition properties. While the nucleation mechanism of Li<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> has been well-studied, its decomposition mechanism remains unclear. This work comprehensively examines the physical and chemical differences between Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> and Li<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>. Both compounds exhibit insulating electronic structures, with rapid lithium diffusion occurring in the presence of lithium vacancies. Bonding analysis reveals that the C–C covalent bonds within the C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> groups are key to differentiating the two compounds. The weakly bonded C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> group lowers the decomposition potential of Li<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, allowing its chemical release as CO<sub>2</sub> without an energy barrier after delithiation. Climbing image nudged elastic band calculations show that the sluggish decomposition of Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> results from the cooperative dissociation of two CO<sub>3</sub> groups. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations indicate that CO<sub>3</sub> dissociates slowly after delithiation, while C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> dissociates simultaneously with delithiation, leading to fast and continuous decomposition of Li<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>. This study offers mechanistic insights into the decomposition of Li–CO<sub>2</sub> discharge products and guides strategies to enhance Li–CO<sub>2</sub> battery performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":40,"journal":{"name":"Inorganic Chemistry","volume":"64 16","pages":"8376–8385 8376–8385"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inorganic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c00832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rechargeable lithium–carbon dioxide (Li–CO2) batteries are promising for CO2 capture and energy storage. However, the high decomposition potential and sluggish kinetics of the discharge product Li2CO3 limit their practical development. Recent studies have identified Li2C2O4 as an alternative with superior electrochemical decomposition properties. While the nucleation mechanism of Li2C2O4 has been well-studied, its decomposition mechanism remains unclear. This work comprehensively examines the physical and chemical differences between Li2CO3 and Li2C2O4. Both compounds exhibit insulating electronic structures, with rapid lithium diffusion occurring in the presence of lithium vacancies. Bonding analysis reveals that the C–C covalent bonds within the C2O4 groups are key to differentiating the two compounds. The weakly bonded C2O4 group lowers the decomposition potential of Li2C2O4, allowing its chemical release as CO2 without an energy barrier after delithiation. Climbing image nudged elastic band calculations show that the sluggish decomposition of Li2CO3 results from the cooperative dissociation of two CO3 groups. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations indicate that CO3 dissociates slowly after delithiation, while C2O4 dissociates simultaneously with delithiation, leading to fast and continuous decomposition of Li2C2O4. This study offers mechanistic insights into the decomposition of Li–CO2 discharge products and guides strategies to enhance Li–CO2 battery performance.

Abstract Image

从Li2CO3到Li2C2O4:了解锂-二氧化碳电池放电产物分解
可充电锂-二氧化碳(Li-CO2)电池在二氧化碳捕获和能量储存方面很有前景。然而,放电产物Li2CO3的高分解电位和缓慢动力学限制了其实际发展。最近的研究发现,Li2C2O4是一种具有优异电化学分解性能的替代品。虽然Li2C2O4的成核机理已经得到了很好的研究,但其分解机理仍不清楚。这项工作全面考察了Li2CO3和Li2C2O4的物理和化学差异。这两种化合物都表现出绝缘的电子结构,在锂空位存在的情况下,锂的快速扩散发生。化学键分析表明,C2O4基团内的C-C共价键是区分两种化合物的关键。弱键的C2O4基团降低了Li2C2O4的分解电位,使其在分解后以CO2的形式释放,没有能垒。爬升图像轻推弹性带计算表明,Li2CO3的缓慢分解是由两个CO3基团的协同解离引起的。从头算分子动力学模拟表明,CO3在分解后解离缓慢,而C2O4与分解同时解离,导致Li2C2O4快速连续分解。该研究为锂-二氧化碳放电产物的分解提供了机理见解,并指导了提高锂-二氧化碳电池性能的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inorganic Chemistry
Inorganic Chemistry 化学-无机化学与核化学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1960
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Inorganic Chemistry publishes fundamental studies in all phases of inorganic chemistry. Coverage includes experimental and theoretical reports on quantitative studies of structure and thermodynamics, kinetics, mechanisms of inorganic reactions, bioinorganic chemistry, and relevant aspects of organometallic chemistry, solid-state phenomena, and chemical bonding theory. Emphasis is placed on the synthesis, structure, thermodynamics, reactivity, spectroscopy, and bonding properties of significant new and known compounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信