Freya Bull, Sharareh Tavaddod, Nick Bommer, Meghan Perry, Chris A. Brackley, Rosalind J. Allen
{"title":"Different factors control long-term versus short-term outcomes for bacterial colonisation of a urinary catheter","authors":"Freya Bull, Sharareh Tavaddod, Nick Bommer, Meghan Perry, Chris A. Brackley, Rosalind J. Allen","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-59161-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urinary catheters are used extensively in hospitals and long-term care and they are highly prone to infection. Understanding the pathways by which bacteria colonise a urinary catheter could guide strategies to mitigate infection, but quantitative models for this colonisation process are lacking. Here we present a mathematical model for bacterial colonisation of a urinary catheter that integrates population dynamics and fluid dynamics. The model describes bacteria migrating up the outside surface of the catheter, spreading into the bladder and being swept through the catheter lumen. Computer simulations of the model reveal that clinical outcomes for long-term versus short-term catheterisation are controlled by different factors: the rate of urine production by the kidneys as opposed to urethral length, catheter surface properties and bacterial motility. Our work may help explain variable susceptibility to catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) among individuals and the mixed success of antimicrobial surface coatings. Our model suggests that for long-term catheterised patients, increasing fluid intake or reducing residual urine volume in the bladder may help prevent infection, while antimicrobial surface coatings are predicted to be effective only for short-term catheterised patients. Therefore, different catheter management strategies could be rationally targeted to long-term vs short-term catheterised patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59161-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urinary catheters are used extensively in hospitals and long-term care and they are highly prone to infection. Understanding the pathways by which bacteria colonise a urinary catheter could guide strategies to mitigate infection, but quantitative models for this colonisation process are lacking. Here we present a mathematical model for bacterial colonisation of a urinary catheter that integrates population dynamics and fluid dynamics. The model describes bacteria migrating up the outside surface of the catheter, spreading into the bladder and being swept through the catheter lumen. Computer simulations of the model reveal that clinical outcomes for long-term versus short-term catheterisation are controlled by different factors: the rate of urine production by the kidneys as opposed to urethral length, catheter surface properties and bacterial motility. Our work may help explain variable susceptibility to catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) among individuals and the mixed success of antimicrobial surface coatings. Our model suggests that for long-term catheterised patients, increasing fluid intake or reducing residual urine volume in the bladder may help prevent infection, while antimicrobial surface coatings are predicted to be effective only for short-term catheterised patients. Therefore, different catheter management strategies could be rationally targeted to long-term vs short-term catheterised patients.
期刊介绍:
Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.