Separating DP1 and DP2 Current Pattern Contributions to Substorm-Like Intensifications in SML

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
C. J. Lao, C. Forsyth, M. P. Freeman, J. W. Gjerloev
{"title":"Separating DP1 and DP2 Current Pattern Contributions to Substorm-Like Intensifications in SML","authors":"C. J. Lao,&nbsp;C. Forsyth,&nbsp;M. P. Freeman,&nbsp;J. W. Gjerloev","doi":"10.1029/2024JA033592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Substorms have been identified from negative bays in the AL/SML index, which traces the minimum northward ground magnetic deflection at auroral latitudes, produced by enhancements of the westward electrojet. For substorms, negative bays are caused by the closure of the Substorm Current Wedge through the ionosphere, typically localized to the nightside and centered around 23-00 magnetic local time (MLT). In this case, the equivalent current pattern that causes the magnetic deflections is given the name Disturbance Polar (DP) 1. However, negative bays may also form when the westward electrojet is enhanced by increased convection, driving Pedersen and Hall currents in the auroral zone. Convection enhancements also strengthen the eastward electrojet, monitored by AU/SMU index. In this case, the equivalent current pattern that produces the magnetic deflections is called DP2. Unlike other substorm identification methods, the Substorm Onsets and PHases from Indices of the Electrojets technique by Forsyth et al. (2015), https://doi.org/10.1002/2015ja021343 attempts to distinguish between the DP1 and DP2 enhancements that cause substorm-like SML bays. Despite this, we find evidence that between 1997 and 2019 up to 59% of the 30,329 events originally identified as substorms come from enhancements of DP2 on top of the 2,627 convection enhancement events already identified. We explore ways to improve substorm identification using auroral indices to fully separate the DP1 and DP2 bays but conclude that there is insufficient information in the auroral indices to achieve this. In reality, any “substorm” list is a list of magnetic enhancements, auroral enhancements, etc., which may or may not correspond to substorm activity and should be treated that way.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033592","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substorms have been identified from negative bays in the AL/SML index, which traces the minimum northward ground magnetic deflection at auroral latitudes, produced by enhancements of the westward electrojet. For substorms, negative bays are caused by the closure of the Substorm Current Wedge through the ionosphere, typically localized to the nightside and centered around 23-00 magnetic local time (MLT). In this case, the equivalent current pattern that causes the magnetic deflections is given the name Disturbance Polar (DP) 1. However, negative bays may also form when the westward electrojet is enhanced by increased convection, driving Pedersen and Hall currents in the auroral zone. Convection enhancements also strengthen the eastward electrojet, monitored by AU/SMU index. In this case, the equivalent current pattern that produces the magnetic deflections is called DP2. Unlike other substorm identification methods, the Substorm Onsets and PHases from Indices of the Electrojets technique by Forsyth et al. (2015), https://doi.org/10.1002/2015ja021343 attempts to distinguish between the DP1 and DP2 enhancements that cause substorm-like SML bays. Despite this, we find evidence that between 1997 and 2019 up to 59% of the 30,329 events originally identified as substorms come from enhancements of DP2 on top of the 2,627 convection enhancement events already identified. We explore ways to improve substorm identification using auroral indices to fully separate the DP1 and DP2 bays but conclude that there is insufficient information in the auroral indices to achieve this. In reality, any “substorm” list is a list of magnetic enhancements, auroral enhancements, etc., which may or may not correspond to substorm activity and should be treated that way.

Abstract Image

分离DP1和DP2电流型对SML亚暴样增强的贡献
亚暴已经从AL/SML指数的负海湾中被识别出来,该指数追踪了极光纬度上最小的北地磁偏转,这是由西向电急流增强产生的。对于亚暴来说,负湾是由亚暴电流楔穿过电离层的闭合引起的,通常定位于夜侧,并以磁地方时(MLT) 23-00为中心。在这种情况下,引起磁偏转的等效电流模式被命名为扰动极(DP) 1。然而,当向西的电喷流因对流增加而增强,驱动极光区Pedersen和Hall电流时,也可能形成负海湾。对流增强也增强了东向电急流,由AU/SMU指数监测。在这种情况下,产生磁偏转的等效电流模式称为DP2。与其他亚暴识别方法不同的是,Forsyth等人(2015)https://doi.org/10.1002/2015ja021343利用电射流指数的亚暴开始和阶段技术,试图区分导致类似亚暴的SML海湾的DP1和DP2增强。尽管如此,我们发现有证据表明,在1997年至2019年期间,在最初确定为亚暴的30,329个事件中,高达59%的事件来自于已经确定的2,627个对流增强事件之上的DP2增强。我们探索了利用极光指数来改善亚暴识别的方法,以完全分离DP1和DP2海湾,但得出结论,极光指数中没有足够的信息来实现这一目标。实际上,任何“亚暴”列表都是磁场增强、极光增强等的列表,这些可能与亚暴活动相对应,也可能不对应,应该以这种方式对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信