A comparative analysis of dune toe extraction methodologies and implications for assessment of foredune dynamics

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alex Smith , Jacob Lehner , Charlotte Wills , Grace Johnson , Chris Houser
{"title":"A comparative analysis of dune toe extraction methodologies and implications for assessment of foredune dynamics","authors":"Alex Smith ,&nbsp;Jacob Lehner ,&nbsp;Charlotte Wills ,&nbsp;Grace Johnson ,&nbsp;Chris Houser","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An acceleration in Sea Level Rise (SLR) and change in storm activity is likely to increase erosion and flood hazards over the coming decades, representing a significant economic burden and threat to coastal environments globally. Foredune systems may mitigate hazards by providing a natural flood protection to back barrier resources, but only if they can maintain their volume and elevation in pace with SLR and changing storm climates. The beach–dune interface, or dune toe (dt), is an important process boundary that has been used to classify and assess the resiliency of coastal landscapes, however, concerns with inconsistent methodologies have been raised in several recent works. This study provides the first comparative analysis of dt extraction methodologies, discusses the potential impacts on coastal research, and presents the Minimum Averaged Relative Relief (MARR) machine learning model aimed at improving the consistency of dt classifications. Results indicate that interannual horizontal (±29 m) and vertical positions (±1.5 m) of dt predictions are significantly different and the consistency in classifications range widely between approaches and study sites. Overall, MARR was the most consistent displaying its potential to provide an improved methodology for comparisons between sites. Over a period of decades, a disparity in the rates of change in the horizontal (±1 m/y) and vertical (±14 mm/y) dt position were also significantly different among methodologies, which can lead to a divergence in vulnerability of predicted dt elevations (−1 to +1.5 m) relative to a 1–100-year extreme sea level event by 2100. These findings suggest that studies focused on the dt may not be directly comparable, and there is a further need to improve the repeatability and transferability of all coastal landscape classifications and metrics to better inform coastal management and address uncertainties of foredune response to changing sea levels and storm climates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"979 ","pages":"Article 179277"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725009131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An acceleration in Sea Level Rise (SLR) and change in storm activity is likely to increase erosion and flood hazards over the coming decades, representing a significant economic burden and threat to coastal environments globally. Foredune systems may mitigate hazards by providing a natural flood protection to back barrier resources, but only if they can maintain their volume and elevation in pace with SLR and changing storm climates. The beach–dune interface, or dune toe (dt), is an important process boundary that has been used to classify and assess the resiliency of coastal landscapes, however, concerns with inconsistent methodologies have been raised in several recent works. This study provides the first comparative analysis of dt extraction methodologies, discusses the potential impacts on coastal research, and presents the Minimum Averaged Relative Relief (MARR) machine learning model aimed at improving the consistency of dt classifications. Results indicate that interannual horizontal (±29 m) and vertical positions (±1.5 m) of dt predictions are significantly different and the consistency in classifications range widely between approaches and study sites. Overall, MARR was the most consistent displaying its potential to provide an improved methodology for comparisons between sites. Over a period of decades, a disparity in the rates of change in the horizontal (±1 m/y) and vertical (±14 mm/y) dt position were also significantly different among methodologies, which can lead to a divergence in vulnerability of predicted dt elevations (−1 to +1.5 m) relative to a 1–100-year extreme sea level event by 2100. These findings suggest that studies focused on the dt may not be directly comparable, and there is a further need to improve the repeatability and transferability of all coastal landscape classifications and metrics to better inform coastal management and address uncertainties of foredune response to changing sea levels and storm climates.

Abstract Image

沙丘脚趾提取方法的比较分析及其对前丘动力学评价的意义
海平面上升的加速和风暴活动的变化可能会增加未来几十年的侵蚀和洪水灾害,对全球沿海环境构成重大的经济负担和威胁。前丘系统可以通过为后屏障资源提供自然防洪来减轻灾害,但前提是它们能够保持体积和高度与单反和不断变化的风暴气候同步。海滩-沙丘界面或沙丘脚趾(dt)是一个重要的过程边界,已被用于分类和评估沿海景观的弹性,然而,在最近的几项工作中提出了对不一致方法的关注。本研究首次对dt提取方法进行了比较分析,讨论了对沿海研究的潜在影响,并提出了旨在提高dt分类一致性的最小平均相对起伏(MARR)机器学习模型。结果表明,不同方法和研究地点的dt预测年际水平位置(±29 m)和垂直位置(±1.5 m)差异显著,分类一致性差异较大。总的来说,MARR是最一致的,显示出它有潜力提供一种改进的地点间比较方法。在几十年的时间里,不同的方法在水平(±1 m/y)和垂直(±14 mm/y) dt位置的变化率上也存在显著差异,这可能导致相对于2100年1 - 100年极端海平面事件的预测dt高度(−1至+1.5 m)的脆弱性存在差异。这些发现表明,专注于dt的研究可能无法直接进行比较,还需要进一步提高所有沿海景观分类和指标的可重复性和可转移性,以更好地为沿海管理提供信息,并解决沙丘对海平面变化和风暴气候响应的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信