Reduced neural activation during positive social approach is associated with better response to approach avoidance training for social anxiety disorder

Christopher Hunt , Morgan M. Caudle , Martin P. Paulus , Murray B. Stein , Charles T. Taylor , Jessica Bomyea
{"title":"Reduced neural activation during positive social approach is associated with better response to approach avoidance training for social anxiety disorder","authors":"Christopher Hunt ,&nbsp;Morgan M. Caudle ,&nbsp;Martin P. Paulus ,&nbsp;Murray B. Stein ,&nbsp;Charles T. Taylor ,&nbsp;Jessica Bomyea","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accumulating evidence suggests that social anxiety disorder (SAD) is characterized by diminished approach of positive social stimuli. Approach-positive approach-avoidance training (AP-AAT) may reduce this bias, but its results have been mixed. AP-AAT might be more effective for patients with deficits in the neural approach processes AP-AAT targets. Here, we attempted to identify neural areas underlying reduced approach of positive social stimuli in SAD and explore whether activity in such areas predicted response to AP-AAT.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This was a secondary analysis of an AP-AAT clinical trial involving 40 SAD participants and 22 healthy controls (HCs). A social approach-avoidance task was completed during fMRI to identify neural activation differences between SAD and HC subjects when approaching positive social cues. SAD participants were then randomized to AP-AAT (<em>n</em> = 18) or sham training (<em>n</em> = 22). Treatment response was assessed by changes in positive affect and social connection from pre-to-post treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to HCs, SAD patients exhibited significantly less activation in the left paracentral lobule (PCL), right superior parietal lobule (SPL), and left lingual gyrus (LG) when approaching relative to avoiding positive social cues. Lower activation in the right SPL (b=-7.15, p = .022) and left LG (b=-6.93, p = .007) during social approach versus avoidance predicted greater improvement in positive affect (but not social connection) in the AP-AAT group relative to sham.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Lower neural activation during positive social approach at baseline predicted better AP-AAT response. AP-AAT may be particularly well-suited to SAD patients exhibiting the neural approach deficits that the treatment putatively targets.</div></div><div><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier</h3><div>NCT02136212</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accumulating evidence suggests that social anxiety disorder (SAD) is characterized by diminished approach of positive social stimuli. Approach-positive approach-avoidance training (AP-AAT) may reduce this bias, but its results have been mixed. AP-AAT might be more effective for patients with deficits in the neural approach processes AP-AAT targets. Here, we attempted to identify neural areas underlying reduced approach of positive social stimuli in SAD and explore whether activity in such areas predicted response to AP-AAT.

Method

This was a secondary analysis of an AP-AAT clinical trial involving 40 SAD participants and 22 healthy controls (HCs). A social approach-avoidance task was completed during fMRI to identify neural activation differences between SAD and HC subjects when approaching positive social cues. SAD participants were then randomized to AP-AAT (n = 18) or sham training (n = 22). Treatment response was assessed by changes in positive affect and social connection from pre-to-post treatment.

Results

Compared to HCs, SAD patients exhibited significantly less activation in the left paracentral lobule (PCL), right superior parietal lobule (SPL), and left lingual gyrus (LG) when approaching relative to avoiding positive social cues. Lower activation in the right SPL (b=-7.15, p = .022) and left LG (b=-6.93, p = .007) during social approach versus avoidance predicted greater improvement in positive affect (but not social connection) in the AP-AAT group relative to sham.

Conclusions

Lower neural activation during positive social approach at baseline predicted better AP-AAT response. AP-AAT may be particularly well-suited to SAD patients exhibiting the neural approach deficits that the treatment putatively targets.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT02136212
积极社交接近过程中神经活动的减少与社交焦虑障碍回避训练的良好反应有关
越来越多的证据表明,社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的特征是积极的社会刺激途径减少。接近-积极接近-回避训练(AP-AAT)可能会减少这种偏见,但其结果好坏参半。AP-AAT可能对AP-AAT靶点神经通路缺陷的患者更有效。在这里,我们试图确定SAD患者积极社会刺激减少的神经区域,并探索这些区域的活动是否预测AP-AAT的反应。方法本研究是对一项AP-AAT临床试验的二次分析,该试验涉及40名SAD参与者和22名健康对照(hc)。在fMRI期间完成了一项社会方法回避任务,以确定SAD和HC受试者在接近积极的社会线索时的神经激活差异。SAD参与者随后被随机分配到AP-AAT组(n = 18)或假训练组(n = 22)。从治疗前到治疗后的积极情绪和社会联系的变化来评估治疗反应。结果与正常人相比,SAD患者在接近和回避积极社交线索时,左侧中央旁小叶(PCL)、右侧顶叶上小叶(SPL)和左侧舌回(LG)的激活明显减少。在社交接近和回避过程中,AP-AAT组的右侧SPL (b=-7.15, p = .022)和左侧LG (b=-6.93, p = .007)的激活较低,预示着与假手术相比,AP-AAT组的积极情绪(但不包括社会联系)有更大的改善。结论基线积极社会接近时神经激活较慢预示AP-AAT反应较好。AP-AAT可能特别适合于表现出神经通路缺陷的SAD患者,这是该治疗的目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信