Assessing energy transition using exponential production technology under different convexity assumptions

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Wenzhuo Zhou , Zhiyang Shen , Michael Vardanyan , Malin Song
{"title":"Assessing energy transition using exponential production technology under different convexity assumptions","authors":"Wenzhuo Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhiyang Shen ,&nbsp;Michael Vardanyan ,&nbsp;Malin Song","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmentally sustainable development necessitates striking a balance between reducing carbon emissions and fostering economic growth. Despite their role in shaping both environmental and economic performance outcomes, energy consumption patterns and their impact on sustainable growth have not received the attention they deserve in the performance assessment literature. Approaches used to model production technologies using a network of separate processes often overlook the constraints that must be imposed on energy structure when energy use is treated as a pollution-generating input, potentially leading to biased policy recommendations. This study addresses this gap by extending the so-called by-production technology model (Murty et al., 2012). We define the exponential model of by-production with respect to both convex and non-convex technology and assume identical energy consumption and structure across different processes comprising the by-production model. Our analysis of the performance across a sample of countries between 2000 and 2019 demonstrates that omitting these constraints overestimates inefficiency, or the performance improvement potential. Results suggest that environmental inefficiency generally exceeds economic inefficiency. Moreover, most nations show progressively heavier reliance on carbon-emitting energy sources, suggesting a significant potential for transitioning to cleaner alternatives in the future. Finally, we find that performance trajectories are similar under different convexity assumptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 108434"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmentally sustainable development necessitates striking a balance between reducing carbon emissions and fostering economic growth. Despite their role in shaping both environmental and economic performance outcomes, energy consumption patterns and their impact on sustainable growth have not received the attention they deserve in the performance assessment literature. Approaches used to model production technologies using a network of separate processes often overlook the constraints that must be imposed on energy structure when energy use is treated as a pollution-generating input, potentially leading to biased policy recommendations. This study addresses this gap by extending the so-called by-production technology model (Murty et al., 2012). We define the exponential model of by-production with respect to both convex and non-convex technology and assume identical energy consumption and structure across different processes comprising the by-production model. Our analysis of the performance across a sample of countries between 2000 and 2019 demonstrates that omitting these constraints overestimates inefficiency, or the performance improvement potential. Results suggest that environmental inefficiency generally exceeds economic inefficiency. Moreover, most nations show progressively heavier reliance on carbon-emitting energy sources, suggesting a significant potential for transitioning to cleaner alternatives in the future. Finally, we find that performance trajectories are similar under different convexity assumptions.
在不同凸性假设条件下利用指数生产技术评估能源转型
环境可持续发展需要在减少碳排放和促进经济增长之间取得平衡。尽管能源消费模式在形成环境和经济绩效结果方面发挥作用,但它们对可持续增长的影响在绩效评估文献中没有得到应有的重视。使用独立过程网络对生产技术进行建模的方法往往忽略了当能源使用被视为产生污染的投入时必须对能源结构施加的限制,从而可能导致有偏见的政策建议。本研究通过扩展所谓的副产品技术模型来解决这一差距(Murty et al., 2012)。我们定义了关于凸和非凸技术的副产指数模型,并假设包含副产模型的不同过程的能耗和结构相同。我们对2000年至2019年国家样本的绩效分析表明,忽略这些约束高估了效率低下或绩效改进潜力。结果表明,环境效率低下通常超过经济效率低下。此外,大多数国家对碳排放能源的依赖日益加重,这表明未来向更清洁的替代能源过渡的巨大潜力。最后,我们发现在不同的凸性假设下,绩效轨迹是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信