Indian rural livelihoods and renewable energy interventions – A critical analysis for a bottom-up approach for sustainability from an energy-water-food nexus context

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Sanju John Thomas , Sudhansu S. Sahoo , Sheffy Thomas , Ajith Kumar G , Mohamed M. Awad
{"title":"Indian rural livelihoods and renewable energy interventions – A critical analysis for a bottom-up approach for sustainability from an energy-water-food nexus context","authors":"Sanju John Thomas ,&nbsp;Sudhansu S. Sahoo ,&nbsp;Sheffy Thomas ,&nbsp;Ajith Kumar G ,&nbsp;Mohamed M. Awad","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indian rural livelihoods are complex, considering the vast geographical regions, climatic changes and socioeconomic divergence. While there is an inherent nexus between energy, water and food in every livelihood they are sometimes intricate, complex and often not accounted. Renewable energy interventions have pitched in livelihoods under a top-down approach in line with favorable policies, regulatory and statutory to meet climate control initiatives. The success of such interventions on the livelihood outcomes are often unmeasured, while possibility of ‘last mile’ interventions very specific to livelihood benefits with focus on energy-water-food nexus remain unexplored. This work focus on the energy consumption pattern of the rural India, financial comparison of decentralized systems over the grid extensions, identify the possibilities of renewable energy interventions in rural livelihoods and indicate the role of livelihood assets and possibilities of the energy-water-food nexus interventions. It is found that around 25 % of the rural population consume 30–50 kWh, while another 25 % consume 50–100 kWh per month. While the lighting load is the maximum and have reached the rural community at large, there is disparity in the reach for clean cooking. While there is a huge potential of renewable energy through the value chain in the agriculture and dairy sector, interventions of biogas and solar lantern have lacked momentum in time with lack of R&amp;D. Mini grids lacked business models and participation of key stake holders in a PPP model. An in-depth analysis of various RE interventions find that a bottom-up approach with a livelihood having robust social, financial and human asset is key for success. It is found that the solar pumps is a best example as an intervention in energy-water-food nexus perspective. A divergence of INR 5/kWh as a subsidy for rural electrification scheme and success of solar pump with a benefit in energy-water-food nexus having a capex of INR 45,000 shows that there is still a potential in decentralized systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100421"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125000622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indian rural livelihoods are complex, considering the vast geographical regions, climatic changes and socioeconomic divergence. While there is an inherent nexus between energy, water and food in every livelihood they are sometimes intricate, complex and often not accounted. Renewable energy interventions have pitched in livelihoods under a top-down approach in line with favorable policies, regulatory and statutory to meet climate control initiatives. The success of such interventions on the livelihood outcomes are often unmeasured, while possibility of ‘last mile’ interventions very specific to livelihood benefits with focus on energy-water-food nexus remain unexplored. This work focus on the energy consumption pattern of the rural India, financial comparison of decentralized systems over the grid extensions, identify the possibilities of renewable energy interventions in rural livelihoods and indicate the role of livelihood assets and possibilities of the energy-water-food nexus interventions. It is found that around 25 % of the rural population consume 30–50 kWh, while another 25 % consume 50–100 kWh per month. While the lighting load is the maximum and have reached the rural community at large, there is disparity in the reach for clean cooking. While there is a huge potential of renewable energy through the value chain in the agriculture and dairy sector, interventions of biogas and solar lantern have lacked momentum in time with lack of R&D. Mini grids lacked business models and participation of key stake holders in a PPP model. An in-depth analysis of various RE interventions find that a bottom-up approach with a livelihood having robust social, financial and human asset is key for success. It is found that the solar pumps is a best example as an intervention in energy-water-food nexus perspective. A divergence of INR 5/kWh as a subsidy for rural electrification scheme and success of solar pump with a benefit in energy-water-food nexus having a capex of INR 45,000 shows that there is still a potential in decentralized systems.
印度农村生计和可再生能源干预——从能源-水-粮食关系的背景下对自下而上的可持续性方法的批判性分析
考虑到广阔的地理区域、气候变化和社会经济差异,印度农村的生计是复杂的。虽然在每一种生计中,能源、水和食物之间都存在着内在的联系,但它们有时错综复杂,往往不被考虑在内。可再生能源干预措施以自上而下的方式投入生计,符合有利的政策、监管和法律,以满足气候控制倡议。此类干预措施对生计结果的影响往往无法衡量,而“最后一英里”干预措施的可能性仍未得到探索,这些干预措施非常具体地针对生计效益,重点关注能源-水-粮食关系。这项工作的重点是印度农村地区的能源消费模式,对电网扩展的分散系统进行财务比较,确定可再生能源干预农村生计的可能性,并指出生计资产的作用和能源-水-粮食关系干预的可能性。研究发现,约25%的农村人口每月消费30-50千瓦时,另有25%的农村人口每月消费50-100千瓦时。虽然照明负荷是最大的,并且已经覆盖了整个农村社区,但在清洁烹饪方面存在差距。虽然可再生能源在农业和乳制品行业的价值链中具有巨大的潜力,但由于缺乏研发,沼气和太阳能灯的干预措施缺乏及时的动力。迷你电网缺乏商业模式和PPP模式中关键利益相关者的参与。对各种可再生能源干预措施的深入分析发现,自下而上的方法以及拥有强大的社会、财政和人力资产的生计是成功的关键。研究发现,从能源-水-粮食关系的角度来看,太阳能泵是一个最好的干预例子。农村电气化计划的补贴为5卢比/千瓦时,太阳能泵的成功使能源-水-粮食关系受益,资本支出为45000卢比,这表明分散式系统仍有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信