Crushing energy-based indicators of dry soil aggregate stability from contrastive land management practices in a semi-arid agroecosystem

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Huawei Pi , Chuanzhou Wang , Sifeng Li , Sisi Li , Nicholas P. Webb
{"title":"Crushing energy-based indicators of dry soil aggregate stability from contrastive land management practices in a semi-arid agroecosystem","authors":"Huawei Pi ,&nbsp;Chuanzhou Wang ,&nbsp;Sifeng Li ,&nbsp;Sisi Li ,&nbsp;Nicholas P. Webb","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dry soil aggregate stability (DAS) is a critical indicator of soil quality and a significant factor influencing soil wind erosion in arid and semi-arid agroecosystems. Previous research primarily used aggregate size distribution, determined through “dry sieving,” to describe DAS. However, the standardization of “dry sieving” has faced criticism, and the resultant DAS based on particle size distribution (DAS<sub>%</sub>) does not effectively reflect the aggregate's resistance to abrasion. To address this issue, we aimed to develop a novel quantitative analysis method and indicator based on aggregate crushing energy (DAS<sub>Jkg</sub><sup>−1</sup>) and validate this procedure by comparing it with DAS<sub>%</sub> and aggregate Geometric Mean Diameter (GMD). We selected 58 research sites with varying land management practices (e.g., crop rotation, tillage, and irrigation) in the lower FloodPlain of the Yellow River (FPYR) to quantitatively evaluate the wind stability of farmland aggregates. Our findings show a significant exponential increase in DAS<sub>Jkg</sub><sup>−1</sup> (0.2121<span><math><msup><mi>e</mi><mrow><mn>0.0451</mn><mi>x</mi></mrow></msup></math></span>) corresponding to increasing DAS<sub>%</sub> (x) for aggregates that remained relatively stable (&gt; 61 %). Conversely, a weak correlation was observed between the GMD of aggregates (x) and DAS<sub>Jkg</sub><sup>−1</sup>. Our results suggest that DAS<sub>%</sub> can be used to assess the abrasion flux of aggregates under certain conditions by converting it to DAS<sub>Jkg</sub><sup>−1</sup>. Additionally, crop rotation and irrigation had a substantial impact on DAS<sub>Jkg</sub><sup>−1</sup>, with flood-affected plots exhibiting a significantly higher DAS<sub>Jkg</sub><sup>−1</sup> (86 %) than that exhibited by non-flooded plots. These findings provide valuable insights into improving soil management practices to mitigate wind erosion and for the restoration ecology of degraded farmland.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 107663"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500151X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dry soil aggregate stability (DAS) is a critical indicator of soil quality and a significant factor influencing soil wind erosion in arid and semi-arid agroecosystems. Previous research primarily used aggregate size distribution, determined through “dry sieving,” to describe DAS. However, the standardization of “dry sieving” has faced criticism, and the resultant DAS based on particle size distribution (DAS%) does not effectively reflect the aggregate's resistance to abrasion. To address this issue, we aimed to develop a novel quantitative analysis method and indicator based on aggregate crushing energy (DASJkg−1) and validate this procedure by comparing it with DAS% and aggregate Geometric Mean Diameter (GMD). We selected 58 research sites with varying land management practices (e.g., crop rotation, tillage, and irrigation) in the lower FloodPlain of the Yellow River (FPYR) to quantitatively evaluate the wind stability of farmland aggregates. Our findings show a significant exponential increase in DASJkg−1 (0.2121e0.0451x) corresponding to increasing DAS% (x) for aggregates that remained relatively stable (> 61 %). Conversely, a weak correlation was observed between the GMD of aggregates (x) and DASJkg−1. Our results suggest that DAS% can be used to assess the abrasion flux of aggregates under certain conditions by converting it to DASJkg−1. Additionally, crop rotation and irrigation had a substantial impact on DASJkg−1, with flood-affected plots exhibiting a significantly higher DASJkg−1 (86 %) than that exhibited by non-flooded plots. These findings provide valuable insights into improving soil management practices to mitigate wind erosion and for the restoration ecology of degraded farmland.
半干旱农业生态系统中基于能量的干土团聚体稳定性指标对比土地管理实践
干土团聚体稳定性是干旱半干旱农业生态系统土壤质量的重要指标,也是影响土壤风蚀的重要因素。以前的研究主要使用通过“干筛”确定的骨料粒度分布来描述DAS。然而,“干筛”的标准化受到了批评,基于粒度分布的DAS (DAS%)不能有效反映骨料的耐磨性。为了解决这一问题,我们旨在开发一种基于骨料破碎能(DASJkg - 1)的新型定量分析方法和指标,并通过将其与DAS%和骨料几何平均直径(GMD)进行比较来验证这一过程。我们选择了黄河下游河漫滩58个不同土地管理方式(如轮作、耕作和灌溉)的研究点,定量评价了农田团聚体的风稳定性。我们的研究结果表明,DASJkg - 1 (0.2121e0.0451x)显著呈指数增长,对应于保持相对稳定(>;61%)。相反,在聚集体的GMD (x)和DASJkg−1之间观察到弱相关性。我们的研究结果表明,通过将DAS%转化为DASJkg - 1,可以用来评估在一定条件下骨料的磨损通量。此外,轮作和灌溉对DASJkg - 1有重大影响,受洪水影响的地块的DASJkg - 1显著高于未受洪水影响的地块(86%)。这些发现为改善土壤管理实践以减轻风蚀和恢复退化农田的生态提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信