Understanding the formation and dissolution of interdisciplinary teamwork networks: A comprehensive framework study of network structure, subject characteristics, and link attributes

IF 3.4 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Junwan Liu, Zhuoran Tang, Xiaoyun Gong, Xiaofei Guo, Luyao Zhang
{"title":"Understanding the formation and dissolution of interdisciplinary teamwork networks: A comprehensive framework study of network structure, subject characteristics, and link attributes","authors":"Junwan Liu,&nbsp;Zhuoran Tang,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Gong,&nbsp;Xiaofei Guo,&nbsp;Luyao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interdisciplinary research teams play a crucial role in addressing multifaceted problems that transcend the boundaries of disciplines. Despite the growing interest in these teams, previous studies have not simultaneously examined the factors affecting their formation and dissolution. In this paper, medical informatics is selected as the research field, and based on the team collaboration network in this interdisciplinary field, the comprehensive effects of its intrinsic structure, subject characteristics and link attributes on the formation and dissolution of collaborative relationships are empirically investigated using the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) and the Separable Temporal Sequential Exponential Random Graph Model (STERGM). Results indicate that within network structural attributes, the presence or increase of closed triangular formations will significantly promote the occurrence or increase of the establishment of new collaborative ties, whereas open triangles impede formation and encourage dissolution. In subject characteristics, interdisciplinary of members positively influences collaboration formation, the enhancement of academic influence will increase the possibility of formation and decrease the possibility of dissolution, and academic productivity uniformly promotes both formation and dissolution. Additionally, scholars of varying academic ages exhibit distinct collaboration patterns. Within multidimensional link attributes, organizational proximity, disciplinary proximity, and collaboration history enhance formation and deter dissolution of collaborative ties, whereas topic similarity exerts an opposing effect. While previous studies have examined team formation or dissolution from one single dimension, this study proposes a comprehensive framework that integrates network structure, subject characteristics, and link attributes to elucidate the mechanisms of interdisciplinary team formation and dissolution. Also, by using a combination of ERGM and STERGM models, we can reveal how the aforementioned factors enhance team stability and reduce the risk of dissolution from both static and dynamic perspectives. Based on our findings, we propose targeted management strategies for different stages of team development, focusing on disciplinary balance, talent recruitment, and cross-disciplinary communication to ensure the team's sustainable and effective operation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 2","pages":"Article 101668"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175115772500032X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research teams play a crucial role in addressing multifaceted problems that transcend the boundaries of disciplines. Despite the growing interest in these teams, previous studies have not simultaneously examined the factors affecting their formation and dissolution. In this paper, medical informatics is selected as the research field, and based on the team collaboration network in this interdisciplinary field, the comprehensive effects of its intrinsic structure, subject characteristics and link attributes on the formation and dissolution of collaborative relationships are empirically investigated using the Exponential Random Graph Model (ERGM) and the Separable Temporal Sequential Exponential Random Graph Model (STERGM). Results indicate that within network structural attributes, the presence or increase of closed triangular formations will significantly promote the occurrence or increase of the establishment of new collaborative ties, whereas open triangles impede formation and encourage dissolution. In subject characteristics, interdisciplinary of members positively influences collaboration formation, the enhancement of academic influence will increase the possibility of formation and decrease the possibility of dissolution, and academic productivity uniformly promotes both formation and dissolution. Additionally, scholars of varying academic ages exhibit distinct collaboration patterns. Within multidimensional link attributes, organizational proximity, disciplinary proximity, and collaboration history enhance formation and deter dissolution of collaborative ties, whereas topic similarity exerts an opposing effect. While previous studies have examined team formation or dissolution from one single dimension, this study proposes a comprehensive framework that integrates network structure, subject characteristics, and link attributes to elucidate the mechanisms of interdisciplinary team formation and dissolution. Also, by using a combination of ERGM and STERGM models, we can reveal how the aforementioned factors enhance team stability and reduce the risk of dissolution from both static and dynamic perspectives. Based on our findings, we propose targeted management strategies for different stages of team development, focusing on disciplinary balance, talent recruitment, and cross-disciplinary communication to ensure the team's sustainable and effective operation.
理解跨学科团队合作网络的形成和瓦解:网络结构、主体特征和链接属性的综合框架研究
跨学科研究团队在解决超越学科界限的多方面问题方面发挥着至关重要的作用。尽管对这些团队的兴趣越来越大,但以前的研究并没有同时调查影响它们形成和解散的因素。本文以医学信息学为研究领域,基于这一跨学科领域的团队协作网络,运用指数随机图模型(ERGM)和可分时间序列指数随机图模型(STERGM)实证研究了其内在结构、学科特征和环节属性对协作关系形成和消解的综合影响。结果表明,在网络结构属性中,封闭三角形结构的存在或增加会显著促进新的协作关系的发生或增加,而开放三角形结构则会阻碍新的协作关系的形成并促进其解散。在学科特征上,成员的跨学科正向影响协作的形成,学术影响力的增强会增加形成的可能性,降低解散的可能性,学术生产力统一地促进形成和解散。此外,不同学术年龄的学者表现出不同的合作模式。在多维链接属性中,组织接近性、学科接近性和协作历史促进了协作关系的形成并阻止了协作关系的瓦解,而主题相似度则起到相反的作用。以往的研究仅从单一维度考察团队的形成或解散,而本研究提出了一个整合网络结构、主体特征和联系属性的综合框架来阐明跨学科团队的形成和解散机制。此外,通过使用ERGM和STERGM模型的组合,我们可以从静态和动态的角度揭示上述因素如何增强团队稳定性并降低解散的风险。基于研究结果,我们针对团队发展的不同阶段提出了针对性的管理策略,重点关注学科平衡、人才招聘和跨学科沟通,以确保团队的持续有效运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Informetrics
Journal of Informetrics Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信