A simple climate-driven semi-mechanistic vegetation model can explain the pan-Asian extent of the glacial mammoth steppe

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Lisa Merkens , Tim Anders , Wolfgang Traylor , Hervé Bocherens , Thomas Hickler
{"title":"A simple climate-driven semi-mechanistic vegetation model can explain the pan-Asian extent of the glacial mammoth steppe","authors":"Lisa Merkens ,&nbsp;Tim Anders ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Traylor ,&nbsp;Hervé Bocherens ,&nbsp;Thomas Hickler","doi":"10.1016/j.palaeo.2025.112962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Graminoid and forb tundra vegetation has been hypothesized to have covered a vast area in northern Eurasia during the Late Pleistocene cold phases, providing habitat for many now-extinct megaherbivores. The formation and persistence of this now nearly-lost vegetation have been either attributed to the cold and arid climate of the glacials (climate hypothesis) or the action of its large herbivores (keystone herbivore hypothesis). Here, we test whether the extent of this plant community can be modelled mechanistically using a few bioclimatic variables with clear physiological effects on plants. We fitted the bioclimatic limits based on the distribution of the closest modern analogues of the graminoid-forb-tundra. Next, we applied this parameterization to conditions of the Last Glacial Maximum, given by the gridded climate-model-based CHELSA-TraCE21k paleoclimate dataset. The projected glacial distribution of the graminoid and forb tundra mainly expands in central Siberia. The model failed to reproduce fossil-inferred occurrences of graminoid and forb tundra in glacial Europe and northern Eurasia, however, possibly because of inaccuracies in CHELSA-TraCE21k, with temperatures being too high in Europe and too low in northern Siberia. This initial study suggests that climate might have played a substantial role in forming the glacial graminoid and forb tundra, but analyses with more climate models will be necessary to corroborate this finding. Our parsimonious, transparent, and process-based model holds the potential for testing the climate hypothesis more rigorously with additional and improved palaeoclimate data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19928,"journal":{"name":"Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology","volume":"670 ","pages":"Article 112962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018225002470","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graminoid and forb tundra vegetation has been hypothesized to have covered a vast area in northern Eurasia during the Late Pleistocene cold phases, providing habitat for many now-extinct megaherbivores. The formation and persistence of this now nearly-lost vegetation have been either attributed to the cold and arid climate of the glacials (climate hypothesis) or the action of its large herbivores (keystone herbivore hypothesis). Here, we test whether the extent of this plant community can be modelled mechanistically using a few bioclimatic variables with clear physiological effects on plants. We fitted the bioclimatic limits based on the distribution of the closest modern analogues of the graminoid-forb-tundra. Next, we applied this parameterization to conditions of the Last Glacial Maximum, given by the gridded climate-model-based CHELSA-TraCE21k paleoclimate dataset. The projected glacial distribution of the graminoid and forb tundra mainly expands in central Siberia. The model failed to reproduce fossil-inferred occurrences of graminoid and forb tundra in glacial Europe and northern Eurasia, however, possibly because of inaccuracies in CHELSA-TraCE21k, with temperatures being too high in Europe and too low in northern Siberia. This initial study suggests that climate might have played a substantial role in forming the glacial graminoid and forb tundra, but analyses with more climate models will be necessary to corroborate this finding. Our parsimonious, transparent, and process-based model holds the potential for testing the climate hypothesis more rigorously with additional and improved palaeoclimate data.

Abstract Image

一个简单的气候驱动的半机械植被模型可以解释冰河猛犸象草原的泛亚洲范围
据推测,在晚更新世的寒冷时期,禾本科植物和草本苔原植被覆盖了欧亚大陆北部的大片地区,为许多现已灭绝的大型食草动物提供了栖息地。这些现在几乎消失的植被的形成和持续存在要么归因于冰川寒冷和干旱的气候(气候假说),要么归因于其大型食草动物的行为(基石食草动物假说)。在这里,我们测试了这种植物群落的范围是否可以用一些对植物有明确生理影响的生物气候变量来机械地建模。我们根据与禾草原苔原最接近的现代类似物的分布拟合了生物气候极限。接下来,我们将这种参数化方法应用于基于网格化气候模式的CHELSA-TraCE21k古气候数据集给出的末次盛冰期条件。预测的禾本科和草本苔原的冰川分布主要扩展到西伯利亚中部。然而,由于CHELSA-TraCE21k的不准确性,该模型未能重现冰河时期欧洲和欧亚大陆北部由化石推断的禾草类和草本苔原的出现,欧洲的温度太高,西伯利亚北部的温度太低。这项初步研究表明,气候可能在形成冰川禾草类和forb苔原中发挥了重要作用,但需要更多气候模型的分析来证实这一发现。我们的简洁、透明和基于过程的模型有可能用额外的和改进的古气候数据更严格地测试气候假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology is an international medium for the publication of high quality and multidisciplinary, original studies and comprehensive reviews in the field of palaeo-environmental geology. The journal aims at bringing together data with global implications from research in the many different disciplines involved in palaeo-environmental investigations. By cutting across the boundaries of established sciences, it provides an interdisciplinary forum where issues of general interest can be discussed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信