Tackling the challenges of food waste diary studies — Testing strategies with Finnish data

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Hanna Hartikainen , Joel Kostensalo , Inkeri Riipi
{"title":"Tackling the challenges of food waste diary studies — Testing strategies with Finnish data","authors":"Hanna Hartikainen ,&nbsp;Joel Kostensalo ,&nbsp;Inkeri Riipi","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study reports food waste diary results in Finland from 2019 (296 households) and 2022 (372 households) using an online food waste diary Kotihukka. According to the results, Finnish households waste 15.5–16.9 kg (SD 16.7–17.5 kg) of edible food per person per year. The results are an underestimate, but diary method is still a suitable method for collecting detailed and household specific food waste data and monitoring the relative difference in waste volumes. Furthermore, to evaluate the results, it is important to concentrate on 1) sample requirements for repeated measures, 2) needed resources, and 3) methodological restrictions. First, food waste diary studies often lack evidence-based discussion on the adequacy of data to monitor the direction of food waste. This study demonstrated that the sample sizes and length of the observation period (14 days) would be sufficient to detect a population-level decrease of 20–25 % in the amount of food waste during the next decade. Secondly, as bigger sample sizes require more resources, the necessity of kitchen scales was systematically studied for the first time. This study found evidence that households can report food waste as reliably without the assistance of kitchen scales as with kitchen scales, and therefore it is possible to cut costs and improve scalability without causing measurement bias. Third, since often most motivated participants attend the diary studies, this study also provides strong evidence that a self-selection bias can be reduced with monetary compensation: the household dropout rate decreased from 29 % to 7 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 114844"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25002557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reports food waste diary results in Finland from 2019 (296 households) and 2022 (372 households) using an online food waste diary Kotihukka. According to the results, Finnish households waste 15.5–16.9 kg (SD 16.7–17.5 kg) of edible food per person per year. The results are an underestimate, but diary method is still a suitable method for collecting detailed and household specific food waste data and monitoring the relative difference in waste volumes. Furthermore, to evaluate the results, it is important to concentrate on 1) sample requirements for repeated measures, 2) needed resources, and 3) methodological restrictions. First, food waste diary studies often lack evidence-based discussion on the adequacy of data to monitor the direction of food waste. This study demonstrated that the sample sizes and length of the observation period (14 days) would be sufficient to detect a population-level decrease of 20–25 % in the amount of food waste during the next decade. Secondly, as bigger sample sizes require more resources, the necessity of kitchen scales was systematically studied for the first time. This study found evidence that households can report food waste as reliably without the assistance of kitchen scales as with kitchen scales, and therefore it is possible to cut costs and improve scalability without causing measurement bias. Third, since often most motivated participants attend the diary studies, this study also provides strong evidence that a self-selection bias can be reduced with monetary compensation: the household dropout rate decreased from 29 % to 7 %.

Abstract Image

应对食物浪费日记研究的挑战——用芬兰数据测试策略
本研究使用在线食物浪费日记Kotihukka报告了芬兰2019年(296个家庭)和2022年(372个家庭)的食物浪费日记结果。结果显示,芬兰家庭每人每年浪费15.5-16.9公斤(SD 16.7-17.5公斤)可食用食物。结果被低估了,但日记法仍然是收集详细和家庭特定食物垃圾数据并监测垃圾量相对差异的合适方法。此外,为了评估结果,重要的是要集中于1)重复测量的样本要求,2)所需资源,以及3)方法限制。首先,食物浪费日记研究往往缺乏对监测食物浪费方向的数据充分性的循证讨论。这项研究表明,样本量和观察期的长度(14天)将足以发现在未来十年中食物浪费量在人口水平上减少20 - 25%。其次,样本量越大需要的资源越多,首次系统研究了厨房秤的必要性。这项研究发现,有证据表明,家庭在没有厨房秤的帮助下,可以像使用厨房秤一样可靠地报告食物浪费,因此有可能在不造成测量偏差的情况下削减成本和提高可扩展性。第三,由于最积极的参与者经常参加日记研究,本研究也提供了强有力的证据,证明自我选择偏差可以通过货币补偿来减少:家庭辍学率从29%下降到7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信