Optimizing natural fiber content and types for enhanced strength and long-term durability in high-performance concrete

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Osama Zaid , Rayeh Nasr Al-Dala'ien , Mohamed M. Arbili , Yasser Alashker
{"title":"Optimizing natural fiber content and types for enhanced strength and long-term durability in high-performance concrete","authors":"Osama Zaid ,&nbsp;Rayeh Nasr Al-Dala'ien ,&nbsp;Mohamed M. Arbili ,&nbsp;Yasser Alashker","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2025.100983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) is widely recognized for its enhanced ductility, energy efficiency, and sustainability. However, achieving these benefits without compromising mechanical and durability performance remains a challenge. Natural fibers have gained significant attention as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to synthetic fibers due to their low carbon footprint. This study investigates the effects of incorporating three types of natural fibers—jute fibers (JFs), banana fibers (BFs), and coconut fibers (CFs)—into high-performance concrete (HPC), with volume fractions ranging from 0 % to 0.75 %. Their performance was systematically compared with that of polypropylene fibers (PPFs), a commonly used synthetic fiber in FRC. The results showed a reduction in workability with increasing fiber content, with JFs having the most significant impact. In terms of compressive strength, JFs provided slightly superior results compared to both PPFs and other natural fibers. For indirect tensile strength (ITS) and modulus of rupture (MOR), JFs and PPFs outperformed BFs and CFs. The optimum fiber volume fraction for enhancing ITS and MOR was identified as 0.60 %. At this dosage, BFs, JFs, and CFs improved ITS by 22–90 % and MOR by 46–96.5 % at both 28 and 90 days, relative to the reference HPC mix, indicating their substantial contribution to mechanical performance. However, fiber contents exceeding 0.75 % negatively affected the impermeability, capillary absorption, freeze–thaw resistance, and thermal performance of HPC. Despite these drawbacks, the fiber-reinforced mixes still performed better than the control mix. To mitigate the adverse effects of higher fiber contents, the incorporation of micro-silica and suitable chemical admixtures is recommended to preserve the integrity and durability of HPC while maximizing the benefits of natural fiber reinforcement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100983"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825001065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) is widely recognized for its enhanced ductility, energy efficiency, and sustainability. However, achieving these benefits without compromising mechanical and durability performance remains a challenge. Natural fibers have gained significant attention as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to synthetic fibers due to their low carbon footprint. This study investigates the effects of incorporating three types of natural fibers—jute fibers (JFs), banana fibers (BFs), and coconut fibers (CFs)—into high-performance concrete (HPC), with volume fractions ranging from 0 % to 0.75 %. Their performance was systematically compared with that of polypropylene fibers (PPFs), a commonly used synthetic fiber in FRC. The results showed a reduction in workability with increasing fiber content, with JFs having the most significant impact. In terms of compressive strength, JFs provided slightly superior results compared to both PPFs and other natural fibers. For indirect tensile strength (ITS) and modulus of rupture (MOR), JFs and PPFs outperformed BFs and CFs. The optimum fiber volume fraction for enhancing ITS and MOR was identified as 0.60 %. At this dosage, BFs, JFs, and CFs improved ITS by 22–90 % and MOR by 46–96.5 % at both 28 and 90 days, relative to the reference HPC mix, indicating their substantial contribution to mechanical performance. However, fiber contents exceeding 0.75 % negatively affected the impermeability, capillary absorption, freeze–thaw resistance, and thermal performance of HPC. Despite these drawbacks, the fiber-reinforced mixes still performed better than the control mix. To mitigate the adverse effects of higher fiber contents, the incorporation of micro-silica and suitable chemical admixtures is recommended to preserve the integrity and durability of HPC while maximizing the benefits of natural fiber reinforcement.
优化天然纤维含量和类型,以增强高性能混凝土的强度和长期耐久性
纤维增强混凝土(FRC)因其增强的延性、能效和可持续性而得到广泛认可。然而,在不影响机械和耐用性能的情况下实现这些优势仍然是一个挑战。由于低碳足迹,天然纤维作为一种可持续的、具有成本效益的合成纤维替代品受到了极大的关注。本研究探讨了将三种天然纤维——黄麻纤维(JFs)、香蕉纤维(BFs)和椰子纤维(CFs)掺入高性能混凝土(HPC)的效果,其体积分数从0%到0.75%不等。并与FRC中常用的合成纤维聚丙烯纤维(PPFs)的性能进行了比较。结果表明,随着纤维含量的增加,可加工性降低,其中JFs的影响最为显著。就抗压强度而言,与ppf和其他天然纤维相比,JFs提供了稍好的结果。在间接拉伸强度(ITS)和断裂模量(MOR)方面,JFs和PPFs优于BFs和CFs。提高ITS和MOR的最佳纤维体积分数为0.60%。在这个剂量下,相对于参考HPC混合物,BFs、JFs和CFs在28和90天的ITS提高了22 - 90%,MOR提高了46 - 96.5%,表明它们对机械性能的贡献很大。但纤维含量超过0.75%,对HPC的抗渗性、毛细吸收性、抗冻融性和热性能均有不利影响。尽管存在这些缺点,纤维增强混合料的性能仍然优于对照混合料。为了减轻高纤维含量的不利影响,建议掺入微二氧化硅和合适的化学外加剂,以保持高性能混凝土的完整性和耐久性,同时最大限度地发挥天然纤维增强的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信