{"title":"How do intra- and inter-organisational collaboration affect research performance? Evidence from German universities","authors":"Cecilia Garcia Chavez , Sonia Gruber , Torben Schubert","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines how organisational boundaries shape the relationship between collaboration and research performance in universities. Using meso-level co-authorship networks and matched registry data from 83 German universities between 2006 and 2019, this study advances the understanding of how organisational structures condition collaborative knowledge production and its research performance outcomes. By examining the contingency effects of intra- and inter-organisational networks, we offer new insights into the cost-benefit trade-offs of collaboration, highlighting the importance of balancing internal cohesion with external diversity. While intra-organisational networks reinforce strong relational ties that support existing knowledge, they may constrain the formation of novel knowledge combinations. Conversely, inter-organisational networks expand opportunities for new knowledge combinations, but at the cost of weaker ties, which may reduce the depth and stability of knowledge exchange. Our findings highlight the strategic value of integrating intra- and inter-organisational networks to optimise the research impact of universities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101675"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725000392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines how organisational boundaries shape the relationship between collaboration and research performance in universities. Using meso-level co-authorship networks and matched registry data from 83 German universities between 2006 and 2019, this study advances the understanding of how organisational structures condition collaborative knowledge production and its research performance outcomes. By examining the contingency effects of intra- and inter-organisational networks, we offer new insights into the cost-benefit trade-offs of collaboration, highlighting the importance of balancing internal cohesion with external diversity. While intra-organisational networks reinforce strong relational ties that support existing knowledge, they may constrain the formation of novel knowledge combinations. Conversely, inter-organisational networks expand opportunities for new knowledge combinations, but at the cost of weaker ties, which may reduce the depth and stability of knowledge exchange. Our findings highlight the strategic value of integrating intra- and inter-organisational networks to optimise the research impact of universities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.