An analysis of factors affecting farmers’ capacity building for sustainable rural and agricultural development in Bangladesh

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Md. Masud Rana , Lily Kiminami , Shinichi Furuzawa
{"title":"An analysis of factors affecting farmers’ capacity building for sustainable rural and agricultural development in Bangladesh","authors":"Md. Masud Rana ,&nbsp;Lily Kiminami ,&nbsp;Shinichi Furuzawa","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2025.100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The government of Bangladesh undertook National Agricultural Technology Program (NATP) for sustainable socio-economic development through common interest group (CIG) approach. This program aims to build farmers’ capacity to embrace improved agricultural technologies with a view to improving agricultural productivity, and farmers’ income. Generally, the farmers of CIG are involved in similar farming practices, share common needs, and interests within the same vicinity. The main objective of this study is to assess how the institutional policies of NATP (phase II) affect farmers’ capacity building in Trishal upazila, a sub-district primarily composed of resource-poor farmers. To achieve our goal, we set the hypothesis for verification as “The institutional policies of NATP (phase II) through common interest group approach have impacts on the underlying factors (accumulation of human capital and social capital) and bring the outcomes of capacity-building for sustainable socio-economic development in Bangladesh (H1)”. For hypothesis verification, we applied structural equation modeling (SEM) to the findings of structured questionnaire surveys targeting CIG and non-CIG farmers in Trishal upazila (sub-district). It was evident that mixed-gender CIG consisting of male, and female farmers were effective for capacity building along with group leadership, crop diversification, access to seed, and mechanized farming compared to those in single-gender CIG or non-CIG farmers. The policy implications drawn from our study suggest to pay attention to gender diversity management to minimize existing gaps, and income-generating agriculture through public-private partnerships for sustainable socio-economic development in Bangladesh.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"17 8","pages":"Article 100202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780225000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The government of Bangladesh undertook National Agricultural Technology Program (NATP) for sustainable socio-economic development through common interest group (CIG) approach. This program aims to build farmers’ capacity to embrace improved agricultural technologies with a view to improving agricultural productivity, and farmers’ income. Generally, the farmers of CIG are involved in similar farming practices, share common needs, and interests within the same vicinity. The main objective of this study is to assess how the institutional policies of NATP (phase II) affect farmers’ capacity building in Trishal upazila, a sub-district primarily composed of resource-poor farmers. To achieve our goal, we set the hypothesis for verification as “The institutional policies of NATP (phase II) through common interest group approach have impacts on the underlying factors (accumulation of human capital and social capital) and bring the outcomes of capacity-building for sustainable socio-economic development in Bangladesh (H1)”. For hypothesis verification, we applied structural equation modeling (SEM) to the findings of structured questionnaire surveys targeting CIG and non-CIG farmers in Trishal upazila (sub-district). It was evident that mixed-gender CIG consisting of male, and female farmers were effective for capacity building along with group leadership, crop diversification, access to seed, and mechanized farming compared to those in single-gender CIG or non-CIG farmers. The policy implications drawn from our study suggest to pay attention to gender diversity management to minimize existing gaps, and income-generating agriculture through public-private partnerships for sustainable socio-economic development in Bangladesh.
影响孟加拉国农民可持续农村和农业发展能力建设的因素分析
孟加拉国政府实施了国家农业技术计划(NATP),通过共同利益集团(CIG)方法促进社会经济的可持续发展。该项目旨在培养农民接受改良农业技术的能力,以提高农业生产力和农民收入。一般来说,CIG的农民在同一地区从事类似的农业实践,有共同的需求和利益。本研究的主要目的是评估NATP(第二期)的制度政策如何影响Trishal upazila(一个主要由资源贫乏农民组成的街道)农民的能力建设。为了实现我们的目标,我们将假设设置为“通过共同利益集团方法的NATP(第二阶段)制度政策对潜在因素(人力资本和社会资本的积累)产生影响,并为孟加拉国的可持续社会经济发展带来能力建设的成果(H1)”。为了验证假设,我们应用结构方程模型(SEM)对Trishal upazila(街道)的CIG和非CIG农民进行结构化问卷调查。很明显,与单性别CIG或非CIG农民相比,由男性和女性农民组成的混合性别CIG在能力建设、团队领导、作物多样化、获得种子和机械化耕作方面有效。从我们的研究中得出的政策启示建议关注性别多样性管理,以最大限度地减少现有的差距,并通过公私伙伴关系促进孟加拉国的可持续社会经济发展创收农业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信