Relationships between soil phytolith assemblages and vegetation of different steppe types of the central and eastern Inner Mongolia Plateau, China

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yuexiang Zhang, Dehui Li, Chenshu Wei, Qinghai Xu, Linjing Liu, Shengrui Zhang
{"title":"Relationships between soil phytolith assemblages and vegetation of different steppe types of the central and eastern Inner Mongolia Plateau, China","authors":"Yuexiang Zhang, Dehui Li, Chenshu Wei, Qinghai Xu, Linjing Liu, Shengrui Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07458-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Phytolith analysis is an effective tool for steppe paleovegetation reconstruction, but many questions remain regarding quantitative relationships between surface soil phytolith assemblages and vegetation cover.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Phytolith analysis was conducted on 86 surface soil samples from the central and eastern Inner Mongolia Plateau to examine phytolith assemblages under meadow steppe, typical steppe, and desert steppe in this temperate Eurasian steppe region. This paper determined the most indicative phytoliths, developed discrimination criteria for these three steppe types, and built models of quantitative relationships between phytolith assemblages and vegetation cover using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm and the Weighted Average Partial Least Squared (WA-PLS) method which can be used for regional paleovegetation reconstruction.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>(1) The R<span>ONDEL FLAT</span> phytolith morphotype indicates meadow steppe; the T<span>RAPEZOID</span> morphotype indicates typical steppe; and the R<span>ONDEL ECHINATE</span>, B<span>ILOBATE</span> <i>Stipa</i>, and R<span>ONDEL CARINATE</span> morphotypes indicate desert steppe. (2) Different steppe types can be distinguished by percentages of R<span>ONDEL ECHINATE</span>, A<span>CUTE BULBOSUS</span>, and T<span>RAPEZOID</span>: R<span>ONDEL ECHINATE</span> ≥ 2.9% indicates desert steppe; R<span>ONDEL ECHINATE</span> &lt; 2.9%, AC<span>UTE BULBOSUS</span> &lt; 7.0%, and T<span>RAPEZOID</span> &lt; 23.2% indicate meadow steppe. (3) While the results from the RF and WA-PLS models are slightly different (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82, respectively), both models adequately reflect the quantitative relationships between surface phytoliths and vegetation in the study area.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Surface soil phytolith assemblages can distinguish meadow steppe, typical steppe, and desert steppe; soil phytolith analysis is a useful tool for quantitative paleovegetation reconstruction in temperate steppe regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07458-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Phytolith analysis is an effective tool for steppe paleovegetation reconstruction, but many questions remain regarding quantitative relationships between surface soil phytolith assemblages and vegetation cover.

Methods

Phytolith analysis was conducted on 86 surface soil samples from the central and eastern Inner Mongolia Plateau to examine phytolith assemblages under meadow steppe, typical steppe, and desert steppe in this temperate Eurasian steppe region. This paper determined the most indicative phytoliths, developed discrimination criteria for these three steppe types, and built models of quantitative relationships between phytolith assemblages and vegetation cover using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm and the Weighted Average Partial Least Squared (WA-PLS) method which can be used for regional paleovegetation reconstruction.

Results

(1) The RONDEL FLAT phytolith morphotype indicates meadow steppe; the TRAPEZOID morphotype indicates typical steppe; and the RONDEL ECHINATE, BILOBATE Stipa, and RONDEL CARINATE morphotypes indicate desert steppe. (2) Different steppe types can be distinguished by percentages of RONDEL ECHINATE, ACUTE BULBOSUS, and TRAPEZOID: RONDEL ECHINATE ≥ 2.9% indicates desert steppe; RONDEL ECHINATE < 2.9%, ACUTE BULBOSUS < 7.0%, and TRAPEZOID < 23.2% indicate meadow steppe. (3) While the results from the RF and WA-PLS models are slightly different (R2 = 0.85 and R2 = 0.82, respectively), both models adequately reflect the quantitative relationships between surface phytoliths and vegetation in the study area.

Conclusion

Surface soil phytolith assemblages can distinguish meadow steppe, typical steppe, and desert steppe; soil phytolith analysis is a useful tool for quantitative paleovegetation reconstruction in temperate steppe regions.

内蒙古高原中东部不同草原类型土壤植物岩组合与植被的关系
背景与目的植物体分析是草原古植被重建的有效工具,但表层土壤植物体组合与植被覆盖度之间的定量关系仍存在许多问题。方法对内蒙古高原中东部地区的86份表层土壤样品进行植物体分析,分析草甸草原、典型草原和荒漠草原的植物体组合。利用随机森林(Random Forest, RF)算法和加权平均偏最小二乘法(Weighted Average Partial Least squares, WA-PLS)方法,确定了最具指示性的植物岩,建立了3种草原类型植物岩组合与植被覆盖度的定量关系模型,可用于区域古植被重建。梯形形态为典型的草原;RONDEL棘刺型、BILOBATE针尖型和RONDEL CARINATE型为荒漠草原。(2)不同的草原类型可以通过圆锥状、急性球茎状和梯形的百分比来区分,圆锥状≥2.9%为荒漠草原;棘突形(RONDEL ECHINATE)占2.9%,球茎形(ACUTE BULBOSUS)占7.0%,梯形(梯形)占23.2%。(3)虽然RF模型和WA-PLS模型的结果略有不同(R2分别为0.85和0.82),但两种模型都能充分反映研究区地表植物岩与植被之间的定量关系。结论表层土壤植物岩组合可区分草甸草原、典型草原和荒漠草原;土壤植物岩分析是定量重建温带草原地区古植被的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信