Common misconceptions and controversies in the management of irritable bowel syndrome

IF 51 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Christopher J. Black, Carolina Olano, Eamonn M. M. Quigley, Alexander C. Ford
{"title":"Common misconceptions and controversies in the management of irritable bowel syndrome","authors":"Christopher J. Black, Carolina Olano, Eamonn M. M. Quigley, Alexander C. Ford","doi":"10.1038/s41575-025-01065-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite an increase in our understanding of the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in the context of abnormal gut–brain axis communication, and advances in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of the disorder, there remain areas in which there are misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of IBS. This Perspective aims to highlight some of the most common misconceptions and controversies in IBS management, including those that the scientific literature has resolved, but for which further education of clinicians dealing with patients with IBS might be required to implement the findings from medical research. Areas of remaining contention are also discussed, as are suggestions as to how these issues could be addressed, both by advances in clinical practice and by further research. This Perspective discusses misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), including diagnosis, testing and treatment, among others. Areas in which issues have been resolved and those that require further research and clarification are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":18793,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology","volume":"22 7","pages":"517-526"},"PeriodicalIF":51.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41575-025-01065-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite an increase in our understanding of the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in the context of abnormal gut–brain axis communication, and advances in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of the disorder, there remain areas in which there are misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of IBS. This Perspective aims to highlight some of the most common misconceptions and controversies in IBS management, including those that the scientific literature has resolved, but for which further education of clinicians dealing with patients with IBS might be required to implement the findings from medical research. Areas of remaining contention are also discussed, as are suggestions as to how these issues could be addressed, both by advances in clinical practice and by further research. This Perspective discusses misconceptions and controversies in the clinical management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), including diagnosis, testing and treatment, among others. Areas in which issues have been resolved and those that require further research and clarification are highlighted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肠易激综合征治疗中的常见误解和争议
尽管我们对肠易激综合征(IBS)的病理生理学(肠道-大脑轴交流异常)有了更多的了解,对该疾病的药物和非药物治疗也取得了进展,但在肠易激综合征的临床治疗中仍存在一些误区和争议。本视角旨在强调肠易激综合征治疗中一些最常见的误解和争议,包括科学文献已经解决的问题,但可能需要对治疗肠易激综合征患者的临床医生进行进一步教育,以落实医学研究的结果。此外,还讨论了仍存在争议的领域,并就如何通过临床实践和进一步研究解决这些问题提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
52.30
自引率
0.60%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology aims to serve as the leading resource for Reviews and commentaries within the scientific and medical communities it caters to. The journal strives to maintain authority, accessibility, and clarity in its published articles, which are complemented by easily understandable figures, tables, and other display items. Dedicated to providing exceptional service to authors, referees, and readers, the editorial team works diligently to maximize the usefulness and impact of each publication. The journal encompasses a wide range of content types, including Research Highlights, News & Views, Comments, Reviews, Perspectives, and Consensus Statements, all pertinent to gastroenterologists and hepatologists. With its broad scope, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology ensures that its articles reach a diverse audience, aiming for the widest possible dissemination of valuable information. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信