Factorial Validation of the Greek Schema Questionnaire for Children: A Comparison of Community and Clinical Samples

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
George Tsouvelas, Michaila Chondrokouki
{"title":"Factorial Validation of the Greek Schema Questionnaire for Children: A Comparison of Community and Clinical Samples","authors":"George Tsouvelas,&nbsp;Michaila Chondrokouki","doi":"10.1002/car.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study reexamined the organization of Young's 15 early maladaptive schemas (EMS) using confirmatory factors analyses based on different taxonomies of higher order schemas in children and adolescents. It also investigated whether there were any differences in EMS between community and clinical/residential samples. A Greek sample (<i>N</i> = 186) of 139 children living in the community and 47 children living in residential care (66.1% girls, aged 15.7 ± 1.4 years) completed the Greek version of the Schema Questionnaire for Children. We identified the single factor analysis as the most appropriate one in terms of interpretability and empirical indices. Regarding conditionality, the two-factor solution was partially validated. The clinical/residential sample presented statistically significantly higher scores on Dependence, Vulnerability to Harm, Emotional Deprivation, Insufficient Self-control, Conditional Schemas, Impaired Autonomy/Performance and Impaired Limits, in comparison to the community sample. Our results are consistent with the key theoretical assumptions underlying Schema Theory. Further research is required to substantiate these findings. Future research could use larger sized samples, consider different placements (residential care, foster families and kinship families) and implement longitudinal research designs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.70031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reexamined the organization of Young's 15 early maladaptive schemas (EMS) using confirmatory factors analyses based on different taxonomies of higher order schemas in children and adolescents. It also investigated whether there were any differences in EMS between community and clinical/residential samples. A Greek sample (N = 186) of 139 children living in the community and 47 children living in residential care (66.1% girls, aged 15.7 ± 1.4 years) completed the Greek version of the Schema Questionnaire for Children. We identified the single factor analysis as the most appropriate one in terms of interpretability and empirical indices. Regarding conditionality, the two-factor solution was partially validated. The clinical/residential sample presented statistically significantly higher scores on Dependence, Vulnerability to Harm, Emotional Deprivation, Insufficient Self-control, Conditional Schemas, Impaired Autonomy/Performance and Impaired Limits, in comparison to the community sample. Our results are consistent with the key theoretical assumptions underlying Schema Theory. Further research is required to substantiate these findings. Future research could use larger sized samples, consider different placements (residential care, foster families and kinship families) and implement longitudinal research designs.

儿童希腊图式问卷的析因验证:社区和临床样本的比较
本研究基于不同的高阶图式分类,采用验证性因素分析,对儿童和青少年的15种早期适应不良图式(EMS)的组织结构进行了重新研究。它还调查了社区和临床/住宅样本之间的EMS是否有任何差异。希腊样本(N = 186) 139名社区儿童和47名寄宿儿童(66.1%为女孩,年龄15.7±1.4岁)填写了希腊版儿童图式问卷。我们认为单因素分析在可解释性和经验指标方面是最合适的。在条件性方面,双因素解决方案得到了部分验证。在依赖性、易受伤害性、情绪剥夺、自我控制不足、条件图式、自主性/绩效受损和极限受损方面,临床/住院样本的得分显著高于社区样本。我们的结果与图式理论的关键理论假设是一致的。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。未来的研究可以使用更大的样本,考虑不同的安置(寄宿家庭、寄养家庭和亲属家庭),并实施纵向研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Abuse Review
Child Abuse Review Multiple-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信