Iron keys from the Roman Province of Iudaea/Palaestina: a typological and technological study

IF 2.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Yarden Pagelson, Yoav Farhi, Dudi Mevorah, Yuval Goren
{"title":"Iron keys from the Roman Province of Iudaea/Palaestina: a typological and technological study","authors":"Yarden Pagelson,&nbsp;Yoav Farhi,&nbsp;Dudi Mevorah,&nbsp;Yuval Goren","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02227-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the early 1960s, Yigael Yadin excavated a number of caves at Nahal Hever in the Judean Desert, containing evidence for the final days of refugees from the Bar-Kokhba Revolt against Rome (132–136 CE). The artifacts they chose to take with them into the wilderness were fantastically preserved, including 10 iron keys, pointing to their hope to return to their homes. Since then, dozens of iron keys have been found in excavations at the region. They comprise a varied corpus of shapes and sizes, yet this diversity has gone unnoticed. In this study, we provide a typological analysis of the keys and argue that distinct types relate to chronological periods with evident diachronic changes. Moreover, we suggest that elbow keys are a local type of Roman Iudaea, with recognizable spatial boundaries, and possibly used solely by the local Jewish population. In addition, we reconstruct how the keys were produced and why, by applying X-ray radiography and metallography. The local smiths utilized easily workable soft iron, in order to fabricate the artifacts’ complex shapes. It was also less likely to break, a timeless benefit when it comes to keys.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02227-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early 1960s, Yigael Yadin excavated a number of caves at Nahal Hever in the Judean Desert, containing evidence for the final days of refugees from the Bar-Kokhba Revolt against Rome (132–136 CE). The artifacts they chose to take with them into the wilderness were fantastically preserved, including 10 iron keys, pointing to their hope to return to their homes. Since then, dozens of iron keys have been found in excavations at the region. They comprise a varied corpus of shapes and sizes, yet this diversity has gone unnoticed. In this study, we provide a typological analysis of the keys and argue that distinct types relate to chronological periods with evident diachronic changes. Moreover, we suggest that elbow keys are a local type of Roman Iudaea, with recognizable spatial boundaries, and possibly used solely by the local Jewish population. In addition, we reconstruct how the keys were produced and why, by applying X-ray radiography and metallography. The local smiths utilized easily workable soft iron, in order to fabricate the artifacts’ complex shapes. It was also less likely to break, a timeless benefit when it comes to keys.

罗马尤代亚/巴勒斯坦省的铁钥匙:类型学和技术研究
在20世纪60年代早期,Yigael Yadin在犹太沙漠的Nahal Hever挖掘了一些洞穴,其中包含了巴尔-科赫巴反抗罗马(公元132-136年)的难民最后几天的证据。他们选择带入荒野的文物保存得非常完好,其中包括10把铁钥匙,指向他们重返家园的希望。从那时起,在该地区的挖掘中发现了数十把铁钥匙。它们包含各种形状和大小的语料库,然而这种多样性却被忽视了。在本研究中,我们对关键字进行了类型分析,并认为不同的类型与时间周期有关,具有明显的历时变化。此外,我们认为肘键是一种当地类型的罗马Iudaea,具有可识别的空间边界,可能仅由当地犹太人使用。此外,我们通过应用x射线摄影和金相学重建了钥匙是如何产生的以及为什么产生的。当地的铁匠使用易于加工的软铁,以制造文物的复杂形状。它也不容易坏,这对钥匙来说是一个永恒的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信