Shared team mental models when using Building Information Models in construction projects

Sander Siebelink , Hans Voordijk , Maaike Endedijk , Arjen Adriaanse
{"title":"Shared team mental models when using Building Information Models in construction projects","authors":"Sander Siebelink ,&nbsp;Hans Voordijk ,&nbsp;Maaike Endedijk ,&nbsp;Arjen Adriaanse","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2025.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores Team Mental Models in the context of inter-organizational use of Building Information Models in construction. Through a multiple case study of four construction projects, it is shown that most of the variations in sharedness of mental models can be explained by geographical, organizational, and technological proximity of parties to the core project team. It is also indicated that the level of consensus on the use of Building Information Models is positively related with the project's Building Information Model maturity and that parties with a central role in a project team score higher on the level of the sharedness of mental models for the use of this technology. This study emphasizes significant risks and challenges in collaboration based on Building Information Models among project participants arising from variations in sharedness of mental models. It is crucial for project management to engage in explicit and open discussions between project partners about risks and challenges related to the Team Mental Models, and implement measures to mitigate and resolve these issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Leadership and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721525000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores Team Mental Models in the context of inter-organizational use of Building Information Models in construction. Through a multiple case study of four construction projects, it is shown that most of the variations in sharedness of mental models can be explained by geographical, organizational, and technological proximity of parties to the core project team. It is also indicated that the level of consensus on the use of Building Information Models is positively related with the project's Building Information Model maturity and that parties with a central role in a project team score higher on the level of the sharedness of mental models for the use of this technology. This study emphasizes significant risks and challenges in collaboration based on Building Information Models among project participants arising from variations in sharedness of mental models. It is crucial for project management to engage in explicit and open discussions between project partners about risks and challenges related to the Team Mental Models, and implement measures to mitigate and resolve these issues.
在建筑项目中使用建筑信息模型时共享团队心理模型
本研究探讨了建筑信息模型在建筑施工中跨组织使用的团队心理模型。通过对四个建设项目的多个案例研究表明,心智模型共享性的大多数变化可以通过各方与核心项目团队的地理、组织和技术接近来解释。研究还表明,对建筑信息模型使用的共识水平与项目的建筑信息模型成熟度呈正相关,并且在项目团队中发挥核心作用的各方在使用该技术的心理模型的共享水平上得分更高。本研究强调了基于建筑信息模型的项目参与者之间协作的重大风险和挑战,这些风险和挑战来自于心智模型共享性的差异。对于项目管理来说,参与项目合作伙伴之间关于与团队心理模型相关的风险和挑战的明确和开放的讨论,以及实施减轻和解决这些问题的措施是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信