How do mining companies induce community participation? Processes, rationales and contestation in South Africa’s platinum-rich Limpopo Province

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Judy Hofmeyr
{"title":"How do mining companies induce community participation? Processes, rationales and contestation in South Africa’s platinum-rich Limpopo Province","authors":"Judy Hofmeyr","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The expansion of mining for critical minerals has intensified debates over community participation in extractive governance, particularly in resource-rich but historically marginalised regions. While participatory mechanisms are widely promoted within corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business and human rights (BHR) frameworks, their implementation often produces unintended consequences, including grievances over legitimate representation, transparency, and power distribution. Despite this, little is known about how corporate actors make decisions about participation and how their rationales shape outcomes. Drawing on five months of fieldwork in platinum-producing territories in South Africa’s Limpopo Province, this paper investigates how mining companies operationalise participation in practice, and how these processes are experienced by those who are intended to benefit. In this way, it provides an ‘inside-out / outside-in’ view of the issue, combining perspectives from mine employees as implementers, and community members as beneficiaries of participatory initiatives. It shows that corporate rationales of efficiency and legitimacy creates participatory spaces that are hard to access yet emboldened with considerable decision-making power. These forums create information asymmetries and transfers the burden of engagement onto community representatives. Where representatives fail to disseminate information, mistrust deepens, reinforcing the perception that participation not only empowers elites but actively produces them. The study highlights the need for clearer institutional guidance on participation, to ensure that participatory mechanisms are transparent, accountable, and responsive to conflict. As South Africa pursues a ‘just’ energy transition, these insights are crucial for refining policy and corporate practices that govern critical mineral extraction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101673"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The expansion of mining for critical minerals has intensified debates over community participation in extractive governance, particularly in resource-rich but historically marginalised regions. While participatory mechanisms are widely promoted within corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business and human rights (BHR) frameworks, their implementation often produces unintended consequences, including grievances over legitimate representation, transparency, and power distribution. Despite this, little is known about how corporate actors make decisions about participation and how their rationales shape outcomes. Drawing on five months of fieldwork in platinum-producing territories in South Africa’s Limpopo Province, this paper investigates how mining companies operationalise participation in practice, and how these processes are experienced by those who are intended to benefit. In this way, it provides an ‘inside-out / outside-in’ view of the issue, combining perspectives from mine employees as implementers, and community members as beneficiaries of participatory initiatives. It shows that corporate rationales of efficiency and legitimacy creates participatory spaces that are hard to access yet emboldened with considerable decision-making power. These forums create information asymmetries and transfers the burden of engagement onto community representatives. Where representatives fail to disseminate information, mistrust deepens, reinforcing the perception that participation not only empowers elites but actively produces them. The study highlights the need for clearer institutional guidance on participation, to ensure that participatory mechanisms are transparent, accountable, and responsive to conflict. As South Africa pursues a ‘just’ energy transition, these insights are crucial for refining policy and corporate practices that govern critical mineral extraction.
矿业公司如何吸引社区参与?南非铂资源丰富的林波波省的程序、理由和争议
关键矿产开采的扩大加剧了关于社区参与采掘治理的辩论,特别是在资源丰富但历史上被边缘化的地区。虽然参与机制在企业社会责任(CSR)和商业与人权(BHR)框架内得到广泛推广,但它们的实施往往会产生意想不到的后果,包括对合法代表、透明度和权力分配的不满。尽管如此,对于企业参与者如何做出参与决策,以及他们的理由如何影响结果,人们知之甚少。本文在南非林波波省铂产区进行了为期五个月的实地考察,研究了矿业公司如何在实践中运作参与,以及那些有意受益的人如何体验这些过程。通过这种方式,它提供了一种“由内到外/由外到内”的观点,结合了作为执行者的矿山员工和作为参与性倡议受益者的社区成员的观点。它表明,企业效率和合法性的基本原理创造了难以进入的参与性空间,但却拥有相当大的决策权。这些论坛造成了信息不对称,并将参与的负担转移到社区代表身上。如果代表们不能传播信息,不信任就会加深,从而强化这样一种观念,即参与不仅赋予精英权力,而且还会积极地产生精英。该研究强调需要对参与提供更明确的体制指导,以确保参与机制透明、负责,并对冲突作出反应。随着南非追求“公正”的能源转型,这些见解对于完善管理关键矿物开采的政策和企业实践至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信