Emergency Department Thoracotomy: Time to Stop – A Trauma Video Review

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sriharsha Gummadi MD , Shyam Murali MD , Kristen Chreiman MSN, RN, CCRN, TCRN , Liam Forsythe BS , Jay A. Yelon DO , Jeremy W. Cannon MD , Mark J. Seamon MD
{"title":"Emergency Department Thoracotomy: Time to Stop – A Trauma Video Review","authors":"Sriharsha Gummadi MD ,&nbsp;Shyam Murali MD ,&nbsp;Kristen Chreiman MSN, RN, CCRN, TCRN ,&nbsp;Liam Forsythe BS ,&nbsp;Jay A. Yelon DO ,&nbsp;Jeremy W. Cannon MD ,&nbsp;Mark J. Seamon MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) can restore spontaneous circulation in selected trauma patients as a bridge to definitive operating room repair. Compared with medical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, there is little guidance on EDT resuscitation duration in trauma. We hypothesized that prolonged EDT resuscitation efforts was not associated with durable return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (ROSC with survival to operating room).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This institutional review board approved study was performed at a level 1 trauma center from January 2022 to January 2023. Trauma bay video and electronic medical data were reviewed on patients undergoing EDT. Patients with inadequate video data, known to be under the age of 18, known to be a prisoner, or known to be pregnant were excluded. Resuscitation duration was defined as EDT incision start to ROSC and/or death pronouncement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven of 41 patients (39 gunshots, 2 blunt) achieved ROSC after EDT. Comparing patients achieving durable ROSC <em>versus</em> not, there was no difference in median time until incision (ROSC 3.2 min <em>versus</em> no ROSC 2.7 min, <em>P</em> = 0.85) or resuscitation duration (ROSC 8.2 min <em>versus</em> no ROSC 10.5 min, <em>P</em> = 0.62). No patients achieved durable ROSC after 20 min of resuscitation. Two of seven durable ROSC patients survived through hospital discharge—both were neurologically intact and achieved durable ROSC within 10 min.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this trauma video review study, prolonged EDT resuscitation times was not associated with increased durable ROSC rates. Prolonged resuscitations should prompt critical re-evaluation for futility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"310 ","pages":"Pages 203-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425001374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) can restore spontaneous circulation in selected trauma patients as a bridge to definitive operating room repair. Compared with medical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, there is little guidance on EDT resuscitation duration in trauma. We hypothesized that prolonged EDT resuscitation efforts was not associated with durable return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (ROSC with survival to operating room).

Methods

This institutional review board approved study was performed at a level 1 trauma center from January 2022 to January 2023. Trauma bay video and electronic medical data were reviewed on patients undergoing EDT. Patients with inadequate video data, known to be under the age of 18, known to be a prisoner, or known to be pregnant were excluded. Resuscitation duration was defined as EDT incision start to ROSC and/or death pronouncement.

Results

Seven of 41 patients (39 gunshots, 2 blunt) achieved ROSC after EDT. Comparing patients achieving durable ROSC versus not, there was no difference in median time until incision (ROSC 3.2 min versus no ROSC 2.7 min, P = 0.85) or resuscitation duration (ROSC 8.2 min versus no ROSC 10.5 min, P = 0.62). No patients achieved durable ROSC after 20 min of resuscitation. Two of seven durable ROSC patients survived through hospital discharge—both were neurologically intact and achieved durable ROSC within 10 min.

Conclusions

In this trauma video review study, prolonged EDT resuscitation times was not associated with increased durable ROSC rates. Prolonged resuscitations should prompt critical re-evaluation for futility.
急诊科开胸术:该停止了——创伤录像回顾
急诊科开胸术(EDT)可以恢复选定创伤患者的自发循环,作为最终手术室修复的桥梁。与内科心肺复苏相比,创伤中EDT复苏时间的指导较少。我们假设延长EDT复苏努力与持久的自发循环恢复(ROSC) (ROSC与生存到手术室)无关。方法本研究于2022年1月至2023年1月在一家一级创伤中心进行。我们回顾了创伤室视频和电子医疗资料对患者进行了EDT。视频数据不足的患者、已知年龄在18岁以下的患者、已知囚犯或已知怀孕的患者均被排除在外。复苏时间定义为EDT切口开始至ROSC和/或死亡宣告。结果41例患者中有7例(枪击39例,钝器2例)在EDT后达到ROSC。将获得持久ROSC的患者与未获得持久ROSC的患者进行比较,到切口的中位时间(ROSC 3.2 min vs .无ROSC 2.7 min, P = 0.85)或复苏持续时间(ROSC 8.2 min vs .无ROSC 10.5 min, P = 0.62)均无差异。没有患者在复苏20分钟后达到持久的ROSC。7例持续性ROSC患者中有2例存活至出院,均神经功能完整,并在10分钟内实现了持续性ROSC。结论在这项创伤视频回顾研究中,延长EDT复苏时间与持续性ROSC发生率增加无关。长时间的复苏应该促使对无效的关键重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信