A scoping review on the European Union agricultural plastic waste management strategies: focusing on liquefaction

IF 5.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Chrysanthos Maraveas , John N. Hahladakis
{"title":"A scoping review on the European Union agricultural plastic waste management strategies: focusing on liquefaction","authors":"Chrysanthos Maraveas ,&nbsp;John N. Hahladakis","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agricultural plastic waste (APW) poses a growing global environmental threat, with Europe generating over 1.3 million tonnes annually. This paper presents a multidisciplinary scoping review of agriplastic waste management strategies, emphasizing policies, technological advancements, and socio-economic factors within the European Union. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated approach—bridging environmental science, engineering, policy analysis, and behavioral studies—to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of various APW strategies. While mechanical recycling remains cost-effective (€300–€600 per ton) for clean, homogeneous plastics, it is limited by contamination issues in mixed waste. Chemical recycling methods—such as glycolysis and methanolysis—are suitable for specific polymers like PET, with potential emission reductions up to 60 % compared to virgin plastic production, though economic viability remains a barrier. Energy recovery techniques, including incineration and pyrolysis, are applicable to heterogeneous waste but emit hazardous pollutants such as dioxins and furans. A key focus is on liquefaction, a promising but underexplored method, which can convert APW into low-carbon fuels with up to 70 % lower lifecycle emissions; however, its commercial scalability is currently constrained by high capital costs and technical challenges. The study highlights that optimal APW strategies depend on plastic type, intended product, environmental impact, and economic considerations. It also underscores the critical role of EU policy, producer responsibility schemes, and public awareness in fostering sustainable management. Ultimately, this work advocates for a tailored, holistic approach to APW, aligning technological innovation with regulatory and behavioral interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100727"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625001391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural plastic waste (APW) poses a growing global environmental threat, with Europe generating over 1.3 million tonnes annually. This paper presents a multidisciplinary scoping review of agriplastic waste management strategies, emphasizing policies, technological advancements, and socio-economic factors within the European Union. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated approach—bridging environmental science, engineering, policy analysis, and behavioral studies—to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of various APW strategies. While mechanical recycling remains cost-effective (€300–€600 per ton) for clean, homogeneous plastics, it is limited by contamination issues in mixed waste. Chemical recycling methods—such as glycolysis and methanolysis—are suitable for specific polymers like PET, with potential emission reductions up to 60 % compared to virgin plastic production, though economic viability remains a barrier. Energy recovery techniques, including incineration and pyrolysis, are applicable to heterogeneous waste but emit hazardous pollutants such as dioxins and furans. A key focus is on liquefaction, a promising but underexplored method, which can convert APW into low-carbon fuels with up to 70 % lower lifecycle emissions; however, its commercial scalability is currently constrained by high capital costs and technical challenges. The study highlights that optimal APW strategies depend on plastic type, intended product, environmental impact, and economic considerations. It also underscores the critical role of EU policy, producer responsibility schemes, and public awareness in fostering sustainable management. Ultimately, this work advocates for a tailored, holistic approach to APW, aligning technological innovation with regulatory and behavioral interventions.

Abstract Image

对欧盟农业塑料废物管理战略的范围审查:重点是液化
农业塑料废弃物(APW)对全球环境的威胁日益严重,欧洲每年产生的农业塑料废弃物超过 130 万吨。本文对农业塑料废弃物管理策略进行了多学科范围审查,强调了欧盟的政策、技术进步和社会经济因素。这项研究的新颖之处在于它采用了综合方法,在环境科学、工程学、政策分析和行为研究之间架起了桥梁,以评估各种农业塑料废弃物战略的有效性和可行性。虽然对于清洁、均质的塑料来说,机械回收仍具有成本效益(每吨 300 欧元至 600 欧元),但它受到混合废物污染问题的限制。化学回收方法(如糖酵解和甲醇分解)适用于 PET 等特定聚合物,与原始塑料生产相比,其潜在减排量可达 60%,但经济可行性仍是一个障碍。能源回收技术,包括焚烧和热解,适用于异质废物,但会排放二恶英和呋喃等有害污染物。液化是一种前景广阔但尚未得到充分探索的方法,它可以将杀伤性废物转化为低碳燃料,生命周期内的排放量最多可降低 70%;然而,其商业推广性目前受到高昂的资本成本和技术挑战的制约。该研究强调,最佳 APW 策略取决于塑料类型、预期产品、环境影响和经济因素。研究还强调了欧盟政策、生产者责任计划和公众意识在促进可持续管理方面的关键作用。最终,这项研究主张采用量身定制的综合方法来解决防止在产品表面形成塑料残留问题,同时将技术创新与监管和行为干预结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials advances
Journal of hazardous materials advances Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信