Review and practical excursus on the comparison between traditional statics methods and Classification And Regression Tree (CART) in real-life data: Low protein diet compared to Mediterranean diet in patients with chronic kidney disease

Q2 Medicine
Vincenzo Calabrese , Daniela Metro , Angela Alibrandi , Domenico Maviglia , Valeria Cernaro , Veronica Maressa , Elisa Longhitano , Guido Gembillo , Domenico Santoro
{"title":"Review and practical excursus on the comparison between traditional statics methods and Classification And Regression Tree (CART) in real-life data: Low protein diet compared to Mediterranean diet in patients with chronic kidney disease","authors":"Vincenzo Calabrese ,&nbsp;Daniela Metro ,&nbsp;Angela Alibrandi ,&nbsp;Domenico Maviglia ,&nbsp;Valeria Cernaro ,&nbsp;Veronica Maressa ,&nbsp;Elisa Longhitano ,&nbsp;Guido Gembillo ,&nbsp;Domenico Santoro","doi":"10.1016/j.nefroe.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Classification and Regression Tree (CART) is a supervised learning approach useful used to segment the space of and the predictors/features space into smaller homogeneous regions that are, represented in a decision tree. It computes the selection of features automatically, in contrast to traditional statistic methods. In this review, we compared CART to traditional statistics in patients who did not attempt a diet to patients who followed a low-protein diet (LPD) or the Mediterranean diet in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and we analyzed them using linear regression and CART methods. In our example, diet adherence proved to be the factor with the greatest impact on renal function decline, but CART failed to detect significant differences between LPD and Mediterranean diet. Similar results were found using traditional statics, but CART gave a model with the proportion of the explained outcome by the model (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>) higher by about 20%, thus a stronger model. In addition, CART allows quick and easy identification of the variables affecting the outcome with a simple visual representation through the decision tree, increasing the interpretability of the results. In summary, no difference in the impact of variables has been detected with the two methods, but CART gave us a more detailed model with a faster and easier interpretation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31770,"journal":{"name":"Nefrologia English Edition","volume":"45 4","pages":"Pages 279-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nefrologia English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2013251425000598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Classification and Regression Tree (CART) is a supervised learning approach useful used to segment the space of and the predictors/features space into smaller homogeneous regions that are, represented in a decision tree. It computes the selection of features automatically, in contrast to traditional statistic methods. In this review, we compared CART to traditional statistics in patients who did not attempt a diet to patients who followed a low-protein diet (LPD) or the Mediterranean diet in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and we analyzed them using linear regression and CART methods. In our example, diet adherence proved to be the factor with the greatest impact on renal function decline, but CART failed to detect significant differences between LPD and Mediterranean diet. Similar results were found using traditional statics, but CART gave a model with the proportion of the explained outcome by the model (R2) higher by about 20%, thus a stronger model. In addition, CART allows quick and easy identification of the variables affecting the outcome with a simple visual representation through the decision tree, increasing the interpretability of the results. In summary, no difference in the impact of variables has been detected with the two methods, but CART gave us a more detailed model with a faster and easier interpretation.
传统统计学方法与分类回归树(CART)在实际数据中的比较综述与实践:慢性肾病患者低蛋白饮食与地中海饮食的比较
分类和回归树(CART)是一种监督学习方法,用于将空间和预测器/特征空间分割成更小的同质区域,这些区域在决策树中表示。与传统的统计方法相比,它可以自动计算特征的选择。在这篇综述中,我们比较了没有尝试饮食的患者与遵循低蛋白饮食(LPD)或地中海饮食的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的CART与传统统计数据,并使用线性回归和CART方法对其进行分析。在我们的例子中,饮食依从性被证明是对肾功能下降影响最大的因素,但CART并没有检测到LPD与地中海饮食之间的显著差异。使用传统的静力学也得到了类似的结果,但CART给出的模型被模型解释结果的比例(R2)高出约20%,因此是一个更强的模型。此外,CART允许通过决策树通过简单的可视化表示快速轻松地识别影响结果的变量,从而增加结果的可解释性。综上所述,两种方法对变量的影响没有差异,但CART给了我们一个更详细的模型,更快更容易解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nefrologia English Edition
Nefrologia English Edition Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信