Pablo Lichtig , Julián Gelman Constantin , Melisa Diaz Resquin , Facundo Baraldo Victorica , Diego Alessandrello , Darío Gómez , Cristina Rössler , Marcelo de Oto , Ramiro Espada Guerrero , Héctor Bajano , Facundo Bajano , Jorge Herrera-Murillo , Laura Dawidowski
{"title":"Comprehensive chemical profile and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Buenos Aires: Insights from the southernmost megalopolis","authors":"Pablo Lichtig , Julián Gelman Constantin , Melisa Diaz Resquin , Facundo Baraldo Victorica , Diego Alessandrello , Darío Gómez , Cristina Rössler , Marcelo de Oto , Ramiro Espada Guerrero , Héctor Bajano , Facundo Bajano , Jorge Herrera-Murillo , Laura Dawidowski","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding aerosol composition is essential for identifying sources and assessing impacts. We analyzed the chemical profile of 100 24-hour PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples and used this data for mass reconstruction and source apportionment. Samples were collected between April 2019 and March 2020 at a site located in Buenos Aires, Argentina. PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations ranged from 4.2 <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>g m<sup>−3</sup> to 51.4 <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>g m<sup>−3</sup>, with a mean of 17.5 <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>g m<sup>−3</sup>, and maxima during biomass burning (BB) events. Samples were classified according to the presence or absence of BB events affecting the area, and mass reconstruction was performed. Optimal OM/OC ratios were determined to be 2.5 (BB-samples) and 1.9 (non-BB samples), being OM <span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span> <!--> <!-->65% and <span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span> <!--> <!-->54%, respectively. On average, other components accounted for <span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span> <!--> <!-->14% geological minerals <span><math><mo>></mo></math></span> <span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span> <!--> <!-->10% inorganic ions <span><math><mo>></mo></math></span> <span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span> <!--> <!-->6% elemental carbon <span><math><mo>></mo></math></span> <span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span> <!--> <!-->3% sea salt <span><math><mo>></mo></math></span> <span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span> <!--> <!-->2% non crustal K. Source contributions were further studied using Positive Matrix Factorization. Open biomass burning was the main contributor to PM<sub>2.5</sub> (28.4%) and total carbon (25.7%), highlighting the significance of long-range pollutant transport. The temporal variability of this factor aligns with fire events identified using fire location, back-trajectory analysis, and aerosol classification schemes. The remaining factors found were: SOA + soil + road dust (17.7%), mobile sources powered by low sulfur (15.8%) and high sulfur fuels (11.1%), construction + grills (12.1%), agriculture (9.3%) and thermal power plants + industry (5.6%). This study provides relevant information for air quality management, highlighting knowledge gaps on primary and secondary sources affecting the site.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 121236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231025002110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding aerosol composition is essential for identifying sources and assessing impacts. We analyzed the chemical profile of 100 24-hour PM2.5 samples and used this data for mass reconstruction and source apportionment. Samples were collected between April 2019 and March 2020 at a site located in Buenos Aires, Argentina. PM2.5 concentrations ranged from 4.2 g m−3 to 51.4 g m−3, with a mean of 17.5 g m−3, and maxima during biomass burning (BB) events. Samples were classified according to the presence or absence of BB events affecting the area, and mass reconstruction was performed. Optimal OM/OC ratios were determined to be 2.5 (BB-samples) and 1.9 (non-BB samples), being OM 65% and 54%, respectively. On average, other components accounted for 14% geological minerals 10% inorganic ions 6% elemental carbon 3% sea salt 2% non crustal K. Source contributions were further studied using Positive Matrix Factorization. Open biomass burning was the main contributor to PM2.5 (28.4%) and total carbon (25.7%), highlighting the significance of long-range pollutant transport. The temporal variability of this factor aligns with fire events identified using fire location, back-trajectory analysis, and aerosol classification schemes. The remaining factors found were: SOA + soil + road dust (17.7%), mobile sources powered by low sulfur (15.8%) and high sulfur fuels (11.1%), construction + grills (12.1%), agriculture (9.3%) and thermal power plants + industry (5.6%). This study provides relevant information for air quality management, highlighting knowledge gaps on primary and secondary sources affecting the site.
期刊介绍:
Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.