Why Choose Deep Learning for Surface-Wave Inversion

IF 4.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Xinhua Chen, Jianghai Xia, Jie Feng, Feng Cheng, Jingyin Pang, Yu Hong
{"title":"Why Choose Deep Learning for Surface-Wave Inversion","authors":"Xinhua Chen, Jianghai Xia, Jie Feng, Feng Cheng, Jingyin Pang, Yu Hong","doi":"10.1007/s10712-025-09882-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, deep-learning-based inversion frameworks are increasingly being adopted to tackle the challenges associated with surface-wave dispersion curve (DC) inversion. Compared with classical model-driven methods, the deep-learning-based inversion is known for its higher efficiency and independence from the initial model. Existing researches, however, have focused on algorithm design and case applications. The reforms that deep learning techniques can bring to inversion need further exploration. Therefore, we explored the anti-noise ability, stability, performance in joint inversion scenarios, and generalization ability of deep-learning-based inversions. For the first three characteristics, we select a published neural network and the neighborhood algorithm as representatives of deep-learning-based and model-driven inversions, respectively, to compare the corresponding performance of these two methods. The comparative tests and statistical analyses reveal that deep-learning-based inversion exhibits superior anti-noise ability and stability, but shows limited improvement in joint inversion performance. And the statistical results from tests for generalization ability show that the trained neural network can predict the shear-wave velocity (Vs) model whose Vs oversteps the model space of training dataset within 20%. In particular, we discover that the generalization ability is positively correlated with the prediction precision of Vs. This analysis provides valuable insights for choosing appropriate inversion methods and contributes to a deeper understanding of deep-learning-based inversions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49458,"journal":{"name":"Surveys in Geophysics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surveys in Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-025-09882-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, deep-learning-based inversion frameworks are increasingly being adopted to tackle the challenges associated with surface-wave dispersion curve (DC) inversion. Compared with classical model-driven methods, the deep-learning-based inversion is known for its higher efficiency and independence from the initial model. Existing researches, however, have focused on algorithm design and case applications. The reforms that deep learning techniques can bring to inversion need further exploration. Therefore, we explored the anti-noise ability, stability, performance in joint inversion scenarios, and generalization ability of deep-learning-based inversions. For the first three characteristics, we select a published neural network and the neighborhood algorithm as representatives of deep-learning-based and model-driven inversions, respectively, to compare the corresponding performance of these two methods. The comparative tests and statistical analyses reveal that deep-learning-based inversion exhibits superior anti-noise ability and stability, but shows limited improvement in joint inversion performance. And the statistical results from tests for generalization ability show that the trained neural network can predict the shear-wave velocity (Vs) model whose Vs oversteps the model space of training dataset within 20%. In particular, we discover that the generalization ability is positively correlated with the prediction precision of Vs. This analysis provides valuable insights for choosing appropriate inversion methods and contributes to a deeper understanding of deep-learning-based inversions.

随着人工智能的快速发展,基于深度学习的反演框架被越来越多地用于应对与面波频散曲线(DC)反演相关的挑战。与经典的模型驱动方法相比,基于深度学习的反演以其更高的效率和独立于初始模型而著称。然而,现有的研究主要集中在算法设计和案例应用上。深度学习技术能为反演带来的改革还需要进一步探索。因此,我们探索了基于深度学习的反演的抗噪能力、稳定性、在联合反演场景中的表现以及泛化能力。针对前三个特征,我们分别选择了已发表的神经网络和邻域算法作为基于深度学习的反演和模型驱动反演的代表,比较这两种方法的相应性能。对比测试和统计分析结果表明,基于深度学习的反演在抗噪能力和稳定性方面表现出色,但在联合反演性能方面提升有限。而泛化能力测试的统计结果表明,训练后的神经网络可以预测剪切波速度(Vs)模型,其 Vs 超越训练数据集模型空间的幅度在 20% 以内。特别是,我们发现泛化能力与 Vs 的预测精度呈正相关。这一分析为选择合适的反演方法提供了宝贵的见解,有助于加深对基于深度学习的反演的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surveys in Geophysics
Surveys in Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
10.90%
发文量
64
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Surveys in Geophysics publishes refereed review articles on the physical, chemical and biological processes occurring within the Earth, on its surface, in its atmosphere and in the near-Earth space environment, including relations with other bodies in the solar system. Observations, their interpretation, theory and modelling are covered in papers dealing with any of the Earth and space sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信