Performance of a novel P. falciparum rapid diagnostic test in areas of widespread hrp2/3 gene deletion

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Aynalem Mandefro, Xavier C Ding, Jocelyn Farge, Gezahegn Solomon Alemayehu, Geletta Tadele, Bacha Mekonen, Yirgalem Gebrehiwot, Nega Berhe, Berhanu Erko, Hannah C Slater, Greg T Bizilj, Rebecca Barney, Allison Golden, Gonzalo J Domingo, Lemu Golassa
{"title":"Performance of a novel P. falciparum rapid diagnostic test in areas of widespread hrp2/3 gene deletion","authors":"Aynalem Mandefro, Xavier C Ding, Jocelyn Farge, Gezahegn Solomon Alemayehu, Geletta Tadele, Bacha Mekonen, Yirgalem Gebrehiwot, Nega Berhe, Berhanu Erko, Hannah C Slater, Greg T Bizilj, Rebecca Barney, Allison Golden, Gonzalo J Domingo, Lemu Golassa","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have improved malaria diagnosis, however the emergence of hrp2/3 gene deletions threatens the reliability of HRP2-based RDTs. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a novel RDT detecting both HRP2 and PfLDH in a single test line. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted at two health centers in Ethiopia, recruiting 1004 study participants. Blood samples were tested using the novel and comparator RDTs, using microscopy and nested PCR as the reference standards. P. falciparum hrp2 and hrp3 genotyping and HRP2 and PfLDH antigen quantification were also conducted. Results In this study settings, characterized by 80% of P. falciparum infections showing hrp2 or hrp3 deletion, the novel RDT showed a sensitivity of 77.4% and a specificity of 96%, surpassing the HRP2-only comparators Bioline™ Malaria Ag Pf (55.9%) and Bioline™ Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (56.8%). Its performance was comparable to the three-line Bioline™ Malaria Ag Pf/Pf/Pv RDT, which detects HRP2, PfLDH, and PvLDH, at 77.7% sensitivity. Additionally, the novel RDT exhibited the ability to detect P. falciparum cases across a broader range of HRP2 and PfLDH antigen concentrations compared to the comparator RDTs. Conclusions The single-line, easy-to-interpret index malaria RDT outperforms conventional HRP2-only RDTs, making it a promising tool for enhancing malaria diagnosis in regions with high hrp2/3 deletion prevalence. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05286359.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf212","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have improved malaria diagnosis, however the emergence of hrp2/3 gene deletions threatens the reliability of HRP2-based RDTs. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a novel RDT detecting both HRP2 and PfLDH in a single test line. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted at two health centers in Ethiopia, recruiting 1004 study participants. Blood samples were tested using the novel and comparator RDTs, using microscopy and nested PCR as the reference standards. P. falciparum hrp2 and hrp3 genotyping and HRP2 and PfLDH antigen quantification were also conducted. Results In this study settings, characterized by 80% of P. falciparum infections showing hrp2 or hrp3 deletion, the novel RDT showed a sensitivity of 77.4% and a specificity of 96%, surpassing the HRP2-only comparators Bioline™ Malaria Ag Pf (55.9%) and Bioline™ Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (56.8%). Its performance was comparable to the three-line Bioline™ Malaria Ag Pf/Pf/Pv RDT, which detects HRP2, PfLDH, and PvLDH, at 77.7% sensitivity. Additionally, the novel RDT exhibited the ability to detect P. falciparum cases across a broader range of HRP2 and PfLDH antigen concentrations compared to the comparator RDTs. Conclusions The single-line, easy-to-interpret index malaria RDT outperforms conventional HRP2-only RDTs, making it a promising tool for enhancing malaria diagnosis in regions with high hrp2/3 deletion prevalence. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05286359.
一种新型恶性疟原虫hrp2/3基因缺失区快速诊断检测方法的应用
快速诊断测试(RDTs)改善了疟疾诊断,然而hrp2/3基因缺失的出现威胁着基于hrp2的快速诊断测试的可靠性。本研究评估了一种新型RDT在单个检测品系中同时检测HRP2和PfLDH的诊断性能。方法在埃塞俄比亚的两个卫生中心进行横断面研究,招募1004名研究参与者。血样检测采用新型rdt和比较rdt,以显微镜和巢式PCR作为参比标准。恶性疟原虫hrp2和hrp3基因分型及hrp2和PfLDH抗原定量。在这项研究中,80%的恶性疟原虫感染显示hrp2或hrp3缺失,这种新型RDT的敏感性为77.4%,特异性为96%,超过了仅hrp2的比较物Bioline™Malaria Ag Pf(55.9%)和Bioline™Malaria Ag Pf/Pv(56.8%)。其性能与三线Bioline™Malaria Ag Pf/Pf/Pv RDT相当,检测HRP2, PfLDH和PvLDH,灵敏度为77.7%。此外,与比较RDT相比,新型RDT在更大范围的HRP2和PfLDH抗原浓度范围内显示出检测恶性疟原虫病例的能力。结论单行、易于解释的指数疟疾RDT优于传统的仅hrp2的RDT,是一种很有前景的工具,可用于hrp2/3缺失高发地区的疟疾诊断。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号NCT05286359。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信